Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYwitz survivor, a fact concealed by the BPjM. The contents of thisquotation would have to be held against that survivor, but notagainst me. And besides, this article also contains the commonlybandied about horrible aspects of Auschwitz, even if it does notaddress them in detail.b) The authors of this indexing decision reveal a blatant ineptitude torecognize science as such, as they claim that my expert report ischaracterized by the “frequent use of statistics,” by “numerous statistics.”As a matter of fact, my expert report does not contain a singlestatistic, but instead chemical formulas, mathematical equations, datatables, physical charts, results of chemical analyses, evaluations ofchemical-toxicological experiments etc. Hence, the authors of thedecision obviously do not even know the basic scientific termstaught in school.c) The indexing decision furthermore contains crude nonsense:i. The BPjM states for instance: “The denial of the atrocities contradictsin a flagrant way the opinion of the majority of the Germanpopulation.” As explained before, science is not a democraticevent, but rather a total dictatorship of verifiable evidence. It isabsolutely irrelevant what the crowds consider to be correct. Orare decisions about the censorship of scientific publications arrivedat by referendum nowadays?ii. The BPjM states moreover: “Yet already the premise of the work– the assumption that the Holocaust did not take place – isfaulty.” The following has to be said about this:1. The term “Holocaust” is completely undefined. In fact, the actualtopic of my work is merely the investigation of allegedmass exterminations in homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz.The over-arching complex of the alleged extermination of theJews during World War II is not being dealt with in my expertreport.2. The result of an investigation cannot be determined from thestart, or else the investigation itself would be superfluous. Anyhypothesis is legitimate as an initial assumption, though, as Ihave explained before. Whether I assume at the outset of myinvestigation that homicidal gas chambers existed or that theopposite is true is of equal legitimacy and therefore irrelevant.If arguing judicially, though, one would have to follow themotto in dubio pro reo and thus initially assume that the mur-171