Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYI will restrict myself to three passages in Dawkins’ book. First thereis his mockery about absurd religious dogmas by comparing them withthe religious cult worshipping the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” as a god(p. 53). Shortly thereafter Dawkins quotes a definition of the word “topray” by a certain Ambrose Bierce (p. 60):“to ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of asingle petitioner, confessedly unworthy.”Prof. Dawkins reaches the pinnacle of sarcasm when discussing variousalleged proofs for the existence of God by Thomas Aquinas. Hisfourth “proof” for the existence of God Dawkins quotes as follows onpp. 78f.:“The Argument from Degree. We notice that things in the worlddiffer. There are degrees of, say, goodness or perfection. But wejudge these degrees only by comparison with a maximum. Humanscan be both good and bad, so the maximum goodness cannot rest inus. Therefore there must be some other maximum to set the standardfor perfection, and we call that maximum God.”Dawkins comments on this thesis of Aquinas as follows:“That’s an argument? You might as well say, people vary insmelliness but we can make the comparison only by reference to aperfect maximum of conceivable smelliness. Therefore there mustexist a pre-eminently peerless stinker, and we call him God. Or substituteany dimension of comparison you like, and derive an equivalentfatuous conclusion.”Judge Schwab’s claim that humor or polemics and science are mutuallyexclusive is therefore evidently wrong. Hence it is actually thecourt which has custom-tailored a definition of science for its own conveniencepermitting it to arrive at a certain, predetermined result, somethingwhich judge Schwab had falsely accused me of doing between thelines and which, according to his own statements, the German FederalConstitutional High Court had rejected as inadmissible.Last but not least(?) Judge Schwab criticized in his verbal reasoningthe following passage of my book on p. 435 (Verdict p. 53):“R: The following collection of Holocaust absurdities is beingconstantly expanded as part of our contest to seek out and catalogsuch absurdities. You can join in the contest and win a prize if youfind additional absurdities in official documents, literature, or mediareports. The results of this contest appear regularly in the periodicalsVierteljahreshefte für freie Geschichtsforschung and The Revi-350