Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYworld’s oceans heated by this could eventually dissolve only smallamounts of oxygen, which turned the oceans anaerobic, resulting in amajor part of marine life requiring oxygen to die off. Poisonous hydrogensulfide produced by anaerobic bacteria was subsequently releasedinto the atmosphere, where it suffocated step by step a major part of lifeon land. The researchers claim that they can deduce all this from thevarious geological and fossil records. These researchers have determineda threshold value of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of some0.1%, from which onward the biosphere keels over in a sense, resultingin a mass extinction of species. If humanity keeps releasing carbon dioxideat the same pace as now, then we will reach that threshold valuein some 150 to 200 years.Hence, it is possible that the stagnation of the expansion of nuclearenergy caused by the anti-nuclear movement, followed by a massiveexpansion of the use of fossil fuels producing carbon dioxide, results inus essentially annihilating life on earth as we know it within a few centuries– us humans included. Then we may thank the anti-nuclearmovement for this.But even that is merely a, albeit scientifically founded, personalopinion. It might as well turn out to be false. This shows why oneshould not set personal opinions absolute. And this is also the reasonwhy I justify my civil disobedience not by trying to prove that – to putit bluntly – the Holocaust propaganda may have dangerous effectsagainst which I have to resist, like for instance the oppressive politics inthe near and middle east or the cultural and demographic dissolution orself-destruction of the German people and also of other European peoples.These are separate issues not belonging into the discussion aboutresistance, because what the nature of the link is between these issuesand the prevailing views on history, is a mere private view, which mayalso turn out to be wrong.The third criterion – the right to articulate dissent – is revealing, as itexhibits the sharpest contrast between the two compared groups. Afterall, the peace movement and the anti-nuclear movement have never inthe least been impeded by the state in expressing their opinions aboutall sorts of issues. Not only did the authorities not intervene against theexpression of their opinions, but a sizeable part of the leftist and liberalmass media increasingly opened their venues to these views. It is entirelydifferent with revisionism, because here all the power at the disposalof government, media, and society is used to prevent expressing our191