11.07.2015 Views

Resistance

Resistance

Resistance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYsionist. Some of these assertions have now been rejected by establishedhistorians, while others continue to be spread as before. Allthese assertions consist of similar absurdities and perversions, soeveryone has to adopt his own criteria and reasons for what to believeand what to reject. I will offer no more commentary on this.Simply enjoy what we have been forced to unquestioningly accept as‘common knowledge’ since the end of the war:”Judge Schwab complained that nothing in this text passage wouldindicate that there is any kind of quality control for the statements to besent in, so that any sender could claim whatever he wanted. Hence thiswould not be a serious attempt at determining the truth. But what JudgeSchwab obviously missed is the fact that this reference to a contest heldelsewhere could and wanted to be exactly only this: a reference. A seriousattempt at determining the truth would have meant for JudgeSchwab that he follows this reference and verifies at the given sourcewhether – and if so, then which – measures of quality control are implementedthere preventing or filtering out arbitrary submissions. Suchmeasures existed there indeed.Hence this point of Judge Schwab’s argumentation proves merelythat his verdict cannot be considered a serious attempt at determiningthe truth, that it is therefore merely a pseudo-judicial verdict.In order to prevent that anyone within the prosecution had the funnyidea due to pressure from higher up to file an appeal against this pleabargain, which would have led to a new trial and thus with high probabilityto a painfully higher prison term, we waived our right to an appealin agreement and together with Public Prosecutor Grossmann right afterthe pronouncement of the verdict, whereby the verdict became effectiveimmediately.VI. The Written Verdict“The defendant Germar Rudolf is sentenced to a cumulative sentenceof two years and six months incarceration for two counts of incitingthe masses in conjunction with libel and disparagement of thememory of the dead.The seizure of business turnover from sales of illegal items in theamount of 21,600 Euros is ordered.The book by Germar Rudolf, ‘Lectures on the Holocaust: ControversialIssues Cross Examined’ is hereby seized and destroyed.351

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!