Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYLudwig BockAttorney at LawAttorneys L. Bock, Liebfrauenstr. 10, 68259 MannheimDefense Attorney MailMr.Germar Rudolf……Dear Mr. Rudolf!10 April 2007Thank you very much for your letter of 2 April.Of course it is not correct when it is claimed that your “lenient” punishmentis to be attributed to your preparedness to fight against revisionism.This false claim is either stupid or – worse – malicious.The result was achieved not due to conditions set by the penalchamber but because the defense had initiated contact with the prosecution.After the prosecution had signaled satisfaction with a prison term oftwo years and six months, a dialog among the prosecution, the defenseteam and the Court took place in a conference room, after this had beenpreviously discussed with you. There it could be ascertained that theCourt would not go beyond what the prosecution would ask for. That isalso the reason why all motions to introduce evidence which had not yetbeen decided were withdrawn by the defense team and by you.After this result had indeed been achieved, it was recommended tolet this verdict take effect at once, since it could not be ruled out that theprosecution would receive an order from a superior position to apply fora revision of the verdict with the intention of demanding a longer prisonterm, and this in spite of the fact that the Court had ruled in accordancewith the prosecution’s request. By letting the verdict take effect and byforegoing any further legal remedy by us and by the prosecution, thishas become impossible.Due to the verdict taking legal effect, your investigative custodychanged to penal custody. This in turn led to the known improved conditionsof detention.Sincerely yours(signed) Ludwig BockAttorney at Law361