Resistance

GERMAR RUDOLF, RESISTANCE IS OBLIGATORYthe least bit interested in my scientific and chemical arguments, as theywere not quoting my book in order to take note of my arguments, letalone criticize them, but merely as an example of historical theoriesthey felt obliged to refute.Hence the Polish researchers deliberately and against the facts,which must have been known to them, chose a method of analysiswhich was incapable of detecting precisely that which – 40 years afterthe end of the war – could only have been the object of contention,namely long-term stable reaction products. It is therefore not surprisingthat they were able to produce their desired results by using this deliberatelychosen incorrect method of analysis: all samples, regardless ofwhere taken, produced similar analytical results, which were practicallyzero.Thus the Poles, by using an incorrect method of analysis, eliminatedall those data which could have become unpleasant right from the outset.Such a procedure is nothing other than scientific fraud, and that isexactly what I accused them of publicly, after the Poles – confrontedwith my questions and my critique – were unable to give scientific reasonsfor their actions. 112 To this day I still have not received any responseto my accusation.3. Arbitrary changes of terms and definitionsThe tragedy of the alleged “code” or “camouflage” language belongsin this category of immunization tactics of theories. According to established,officially sanctioned historiography, the National Socialists aresupposed to have used this “code” language during the war in order tohide their genocidal actions in their documents. Whereas expressionssuch as “emigration,” “resettlements,” “deportation” etc., if used indocuments pertaining to the so-called “Jewish Question” up to the outbreakof hostilities between Germany and the Soviet Union in June of1941, expressed exactly what these words actually mean – there is generalconsent about this – after this point it is claimed that there was asudden change in meaning of these terms, because from that point intime onward these expressions are said to have become mere harmlesssounding euphemisms for mass murder.112 Cf. Letter exchange between Prof. Markiewicz and me, first published in Sleipnir, issue 3/1995,pp. 29-33; also in Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz Lies, The Barnes Review, Washington,DC, 2011, pp. 56-65 (www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/18-al.pdf).84