a lack <strong>of</strong> speculation as a Navajo trait. Traditional Navajos rarely speculate about motives orpast or future happenings. They generally report exactly what <strong>the</strong>y see and hear withoutinterpretation.<strong>In</strong> a study by Henry (1947) Hopi and Navajo children were asked to make up stories about a set<strong>of</strong> ambiguous pictures. The Navajos described what <strong>the</strong>y saw and did not try to explain <strong>the</strong>pictured activity. The Hopi children explained what <strong>the</strong>y thought <strong>the</strong> people were doing and why<strong>the</strong>y were doing it. They also volunteered what <strong>the</strong>y thought had led up to <strong>the</strong> activity and whatmight happen in <strong>the</strong> future. This type <strong>of</strong> different view <strong>of</strong> reality has obvious implications in <strong>the</strong>use <strong>of</strong> particular curriculum materials or instructional techniques.Many cultural elements or indicators are shared by different cultures, especially those in temporalor geographic proximity to one ano<strong>the</strong>r. This sharing is frequently a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong>culture change, a dynamic source <strong>of</strong> some elements within a particular culture at a particularpoint in time. Culture is dynamic and no two individual members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural group shareexactly <strong>the</strong> same system <strong>of</strong> cultural knowledge. Social scientists all have a slightly differentview <strong>of</strong> culture, depending on <strong>the</strong>ir peculiar perspective. As used in this paper, culture is acognitive construct as defined by Goodenough (1957).(Culture is) whatever it is one has to know or believe in order to operate in amanner acceptable to its members. Culture is not a material phenomenon; it doesnot consist <strong>of</strong> things, behavior, or emotions. It is ra<strong>the</strong>r an organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sethings. It is <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> things that people have in mind, <strong>the</strong>ir models <strong>of</strong>perceiving, relating, and o<strong>the</strong>rwise interpreting <strong>the</strong>m.As used in this paper, culture change is a type <strong>of</strong> adjustment to <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> two (or more)cultures. Just as goods and services may be exchanged by <strong>the</strong> two cultures, so may values,languages, and behavior patterns. Padilla (1 980) proposes that <strong>the</strong>me are three stages <strong>of</strong> culturechange: contact, conflict, and adaptation, He st<strong>ates</strong> that any measurement <strong>of</strong> culture change mustconsider each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three stages at both <strong>the</strong> group and individual level. Linton (I 940) statedthat directed and non-directed situations <strong>of</strong> contact, i.e., <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact, must also beconsidered. The history, persistence, purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact, <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> conflict andadaptations to this contact, as well as <strong>the</strong> individual's exposure to <strong>the</strong> second culture, interpersonaland intrapersonal conflicts, and personal adaptations, must all be considered.It is important to consider <strong>the</strong> nature, purpose, duration, and permanence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact. Forexample, less culture change may be expected when <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contact is mutuallydesired trade, as in <strong>the</strong> 19th century between <strong>the</strong> Tlingits and <strong>the</strong> British in SE Alaska, asopposed to <strong>the</strong> forced exchange between <strong>the</strong> Russians and Eskimos in SW Alaska during <strong>the</strong>same time period.Where <strong>the</strong>re is deliberate extermination <strong>of</strong> beliefs over a long period <strong>of</strong> time we find even greaterculture change. For example, <strong>the</strong> Moravian missionaries engaged in a systematic destruction <strong>of</strong>Yup'ik Eskimo culture. There is almost always some degree <strong>of</strong> resistance to change as mostcultural groups do not lightly give up valued practices, whe<strong>the</strong>r economic, religious, or communicative.This conflict may be manifested in many ways, whe<strong>the</strong>r as psychological stress orphysical aggression, but will always lead to some form <strong>of</strong> adaptation. Adaptation is in this sensea reduction <strong>of</strong> conflict and may take several forms.Ano<strong>the</strong>r effect <strong>of</strong> culture change is acculturative stress. This stress is common though not inevitableduring culture change, Berry (1 970) stated that acculturative stress is characterized by deviantbehavior, psychosomatic symptoms and feelings <strong>of</strong> marginality, Berry also found thatvariations in stress and culture change patterns were dependent to some extent upon <strong>the</strong> cultural© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved138
and psychological characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> culture group, and <strong>the</strong> degree and nature <strong>of</strong> previouscontact with culturally diverse groups. This type <strong>of</strong> stress has particular implications foreducators as <strong>the</strong> side effects look a lot like <strong>the</strong> indications <strong>of</strong> learning disabilities commonly usedto place children in special education classes.The influence <strong>of</strong> child rearing and training patterns is <strong>of</strong> special importance in <strong>the</strong> growth anddevelopment <strong>of</strong> children. Socialization and family interaction patterns are affected by culturechange in <strong>the</strong> same way that language, economic subsistence, and o<strong>the</strong>r cultural elements are.There is also an interactive effect among <strong>the</strong>se elements in regard to <strong>the</strong> growth and development<strong>of</strong> children. There are effects upon <strong>the</strong>ir language, cognitive style, personality, and self concept.These are <strong>of</strong> concern in <strong>the</strong> child's development <strong>of</strong> his or her full potential and especially when<strong>the</strong> child may have special learning and behavior problems in <strong>the</strong> mainstream school system.<strong>In</strong> one study <strong>of</strong> Hispanic culture change, Szapocznik and Kurtines (1980) found that stress from<strong>the</strong> culture change process could result in emotional and substance abuse problems. Thisoccurred when family members adjusting to life in mainstream American culture did not integrate<strong>the</strong>ir home culture and language with that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mainstream community. Although livingin a community with two languages and cultures, both <strong>the</strong> parents and teenagers in <strong>the</strong> studyrejected one culture and tried to identify exclusively with only one culture. These families werecompared with families where parents and teenagers were bilingual and developed cross-culturalmethods <strong>of</strong> adapting to <strong>the</strong>ir new communities. The bilingual and cross-cultural families hadfewer incidents <strong>of</strong> substance abuse and dysfunctional interactions than <strong>the</strong> "monocultural'families.<strong>In</strong> summary, <strong>the</strong> differing culture change patterns <strong>of</strong> culturally and linguistically different childrenmust be taken into consideration in <strong>the</strong>ir assessment and instruction in mainstream schoolsand classrooms. The interactive effects <strong>of</strong> a particular child's culture change and <strong>the</strong> child'sspecial needs must be considered in developing appropriate educational programs. <strong>In</strong> <strong>the</strong> nextissue <strong>of</strong> Diversity, <strong>the</strong>se special needs and <strong>the</strong> implications <strong>of</strong> culture and language change uponinstructional intervention will be addressed.© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved139
- Page 2 and 3:
"Those who arrive by age 12 or 13 m
- Page 5:
Article I.2 Are Signed Languages "R
- Page 8 and 9:
Biological analyses of the status o
- Page 10 and 11:
and beyond, speaking and signing ch
- Page 12 and 13:
Conclusion: Are Signed Languages Re
- Page 14 and 15:
Article I.3 The Interpreter: Has a
- Page 16 and 17:
A few weeks earlier, I had called F
- Page 18 and 19:
“We struggled even getting to the
- Page 20 and 21:
herself by strapping a cassette rec
- Page 22 and 23:
In 1998, after nine years as the ch
- Page 24 and 25:
momentary burst of excitement that
- Page 26 and 27:
can shape core grammar. Because the
- Page 28 and 29:
The authors compared animal and hum
- Page 30 and 31:
monkey moved. He followed it with h
- Page 32 and 33:
delight, fear, laughter, and surpri
- Page 34 and 35:
Piipaío in a hut: Pirahã huts typ
- Page 36 and 37:
LEP students, and equitable organiz
- Page 38 and 39:
4. Second language development crea
- Page 41 and 42:
curriculum or "teaching to the test
- Page 43 and 44:
portfolio work was scanned and stor
- Page 45 and 46:
experiences of many groups of stude
- Page 47 and 48:
While not disagreeing that interpre
- Page 49 and 50:
sound educational practice, however
- Page 51 and 52:
arises from the efforts to abstract
- Page 53 and 54:
Article II.2 Cross-Cultural Communi
- Page 55 and 56:
males who can serve as positive rol
- Page 57 and 58:
Understanding another culture is a
- Page 59 and 60:
Pets and AnimalsWhich animals are v
- Page 61 and 62:
to teach standard English is reflec
- Page 63 and 64:
Asking personal questions of a pers
- Page 65 and 66:
Using Cross Cultural Communication
- Page 67 and 68:
Why Do Nonstandard English-Speaking
- Page 69 and 70:
Before beginning to teach standard
- Page 71 and 72:
• Negative attitudes toward low p
- Page 73 and 74:
New standardized tests and assessme
- Page 75 and 76:
Each of the behaviors listed above
- Page 77 and 78:
Article II.3 Hard Work Hypothesis:
- Page 79 and 80:
each point higher in SES, students
- Page 81 and 82:
This case does not provide strong s
- Page 83 and 84:
Article II.4 Language Acquisition a
- Page 85 and 86:
1992, p. XI). These researchers, wh
- Page 87 and 88: comprehend a word within a specific
- Page 89 and 90: more to the truthfulness of the chi
- Page 91 and 92: This idea of “semilingualism” c
- Page 93 and 94: Article III.1 A Brief Description o
- Page 95 and 96: take different lengths of time to c
- Page 97 and 98: example, should involve the same co
- Page 99 and 100: As with all stages of BICS acquisit
- Page 101 and 102: Assessment techniques at stage 3 ca
- Page 103 and 104: different. Therefore, the social di
- Page 105: integrative motivation. Basically,
- Page 109 and 110: (Ellis, 1985; Hakuta, 1986). Howeve
- Page 111 and 112: that sociocultural processes have o
- Page 113 and 114: Article III.3 How Children Acquire
- Page 115 and 116: phonetic units (unique to signed la
- Page 117 and 118: Article III.4 Toward a Sociocultura
- Page 119 and 120: emember is that the fundamental goa
- Page 121 and 122: The best practices models can be th
- Page 123 and 124: By focusing on the dialectic betwee
- Page 125 and 126: intergenerational wisdom shared by
- Page 127 and 128: Daily Realities RecappedThe above v
- Page 129 and 130: traditions. At a time in our histor
- Page 131 and 132: We will now look at two examples of
- Page 133 and 134: Speakers communicate fluently, main
- Page 135 and 136: question the effects of such attitu
- Page 137: Article IV.3 Culture Change: Effect
- Page 141 and 142: Contraryto what wewere expecting, t
- Page 143 and 144: Article V.1 Assessment in ESL & Bil
- Page 145 and 146: vocabulary does the student lack?Is
- Page 147 and 148: whether they are LEP and to provide
- Page 149 and 150: Fourth, ESL and bilingual program s
- Page 151 and 152: competent reader/writer. All versio
- Page 153 and 154: Table 1Comparison of Recent Accultu
- Page 155 and 156: unilinear model, which measures the
- Page 157 and 158: an English-only instructional progr
- Page 159 and 160: Article V.3 Assessment of English L
- Page 161 and 162: 8. Change answers only for a very g
- Page 163 and 164: Riles, 1979; Jose P. v Ambac, 1983)
- Page 165 and 166: proficiency is often underestimated
- Page 167 and 168: Finally, when second language reade
- Page 169 and 170: for their decisions, noting issues
- Page 171 and 172: As mentioned above, when the transi
- Page 173 and 174: ather than generic adjectives and t
- Page 175 and 176: their imagined points of view. Ther
- Page 177 and 178: English texts and demonstrate progr
- Page 179: using inter-district teams). In the