12.07.2015 Views

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

comprehend a word within a specific routine or context (such as “jacket” during a gettingdressed for going outside routine) and with an accompanying gesture or linguistic cue (such aspointing to or naming an item using known words, such as “doggie book”). We can say a childreally understands a word when she is able to follow a direction or identify an item, when <strong>the</strong>item(s) involved are not present and <strong>the</strong> context is not routine. For example, a child demonstr<strong>ates</strong>some amount <strong>of</strong> comprehension when she puts her shoes on after being asked to during adressing routine. She demonstr<strong>ates</strong> greater comprehension when she is asked to “show me howyou put your shoes on” during a non-dressing situation, such as play testing. With secondlanguage learners, we must be careful that we do not ei<strong>the</strong>r over- or under-estimate <strong>the</strong>irreceptive language abilities by failing to analyze <strong>the</strong> linguistic, social, situational, and/or gesturalcontext <strong>of</strong> comprehension.The process <strong>of</strong> language acquisition.Language acquisition does not progress randomly. Although <strong>the</strong>re is significant individualvariation, children appear to acquire language in a fairly systematic fashion. The sequence <strong>of</strong>acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntax and morphology, <strong>the</strong> manner in which <strong>the</strong>se develop, and <strong>the</strong> development<strong>of</strong> phonology all appear to proceed in a somewhat consistent and systematic fashion.Evidence for <strong>the</strong> biological foundation <strong>of</strong> grammatical acquisition came with <strong>the</strong> discovery thatgrammatical morpheme acquisition appears to progress in an orderly fashion (Brown, 1973).Brown observed <strong>the</strong> grammatical development <strong>of</strong> three children, Adam, Eve and Sarah, over aperiod <strong>of</strong> several years and discovered that <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first 14 grammaticalmorphemes was <strong>the</strong> same for all three children. Table 6-1 lists <strong>the</strong>se morphemes in <strong>the</strong>ir order <strong>of</strong>appearance. Ano<strong>the</strong>r classic study also found striking similarities in <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong>morphological acquisition among native-English speaking children (deVilliers & deVilliers,1973).Figure 6-1Brown’s first 14 Morphemespresent progressive -ing (without auxiliary)“in”“on”regular plural –sirregular pastpossessive – suncontractible copula (to be as main verb)ar<strong>ticle</strong>sregular past –edregular 3 rd personirregular 3 rd personuncontractible auxiliarycontractible copulacontractible auxiliary<strong>In</strong> addition to determining <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> grammatical morphemes in English, <strong>the</strong>research by Brown (1973) and deVilliers and deVilliers (1973) was also important inestablishing parameters for when <strong>the</strong>se morphemes should appear, in terms <strong>of</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> language© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!