sees his fa<strong>the</strong>r coming into <strong>the</strong> room and spontaneously looks at him and says /dada/, and inaddition, has done this before in a similar context, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re is a good likelihood that for him,/dada/ is now a word that means “Daddy.”For Joey to do this, what must he know and be able to do? He must have a variety <strong>of</strong> linguistic,cognitive, social, and perceptual competencies. It is amazing to consider all that a child must becapable <strong>of</strong> to produce even one real word. This is as true for <strong>the</strong> child acquiring a secondlanguage as it is for her first.Linguistically, Joey has already developed quite a bit <strong>of</strong> knowledge about <strong>the</strong> phonology <strong>of</strong> hisfirst language. Studies have indicated that within <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> life, children have alreadylearned what sounds and sound combinations are possible in <strong>the</strong>ir native language. Using <strong>the</strong>example presented in <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter, native-English speaking infants learn that aword cannot start with “mb.” Joey has also learned how to produce a variety <strong>of</strong> sounds correctlyin English. Although his pronunciation is not adult-like, it is well-enough developed that manyearly words are grossly intelligible.Joey has also started understanding how language functions. Although first words can assume avariety <strong>of</strong> grammatical functions, young children have at least a basic understanding <strong>of</strong> what aword is and what different functions <strong>the</strong>y can perform. Joey also understands <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong>various words, even though his understanding may not be exactly like that <strong>of</strong> an adult. To at leastsome extent <strong>the</strong>n, Joey understands <strong>the</strong> words “mama” and “daddy.”<strong>In</strong> addition to understanding <strong>the</strong> early words that he produces, Joey understands <strong>the</strong>ir underlyingconcepts. To identify a mo<strong>the</strong>r, Joey has to understand what a mo<strong>the</strong>r is. His understanding <strong>of</strong>this concept, again, may not be exactly like that <strong>of</strong> an adult (he may conceive <strong>of</strong> a mo<strong>the</strong>r as anyfemale adult caregiver ra<strong>the</strong>r than one unique individual) but he clearly does have some idea.This means that Joey can also differentiate between individuals and can typically differentiatebetween genders and age groups. Joey must be able to understand a lot <strong>of</strong> what goes on aroundhim and differentiate and interpret relationships between objects, actions, sounds and people inhis environment.To produce one word, a child must also have acquire quite a bit <strong>of</strong> social and cultural knowledge.Words have social functions - <strong>the</strong>y can be used to label, request, greet, query, and deny, to namejust a few. Therefore, by saying “mama”, Joey demonstr<strong>ates</strong> his knowledge about <strong>the</strong> socialfunctions <strong>of</strong> language and his understanding <strong>of</strong> social relationships. He knows that words are tobe used interactively with o<strong>the</strong>rs and he knows when and how to initiate and continuecommunicative interactions. He knows how to take conversational turns and he expects thato<strong>the</strong>rs will respond to him in specific ways.Joey must have some useful auditory capabilities if he is producing his first words orally.Although deaf and severely hearing impaired children do begin to babble, <strong>the</strong>y stop doing soaround <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> six months. Therefore, production <strong>of</strong> oral speech is dependent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability tohear. Joey is also able to process auditory input. He can distinguish between human speech andenvironmental sounds. Visual acuity is not necessary to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> oral language,however, <strong>the</strong> language development <strong>of</strong> blind children has been studied and found to be affectedby <strong>the</strong>ir blindness. Clearly, children can do and know a lot, even before <strong>the</strong>y ever produce <strong>the</strong>irfirst words.Language comprehension.What does it mean to understand a word? Language comprehension is not an all or nonephenomena. This idea is important for educators to understand. Children may be able to“comprehend” a word or phrase in some contexts and not in o<strong>the</strong>rs. Children may first© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved86
comprehend a word within a specific routine or context (such as “jacket” during a gettingdressed for going outside routine) and with an accompanying gesture or linguistic cue (such aspointing to or naming an item using known words, such as “doggie book”). We can say a childreally understands a word when she is able to follow a direction or identify an item, when <strong>the</strong>item(s) involved are not present and <strong>the</strong> context is not routine. For example, a child demonstr<strong>ates</strong>some amount <strong>of</strong> comprehension when she puts her shoes on after being asked to during adressing routine. She demonstr<strong>ates</strong> greater comprehension when she is asked to “show me howyou put your shoes on” during a non-dressing situation, such as play testing. With secondlanguage learners, we must be careful that we do not ei<strong>the</strong>r over- or under-estimate <strong>the</strong>irreceptive language abilities by failing to analyze <strong>the</strong> linguistic, social, situational, and/or gesturalcontext <strong>of</strong> comprehension.The process <strong>of</strong> language acquisition.Language acquisition does not progress randomly. Although <strong>the</strong>re is significant individualvariation, children appear to acquire language in a fairly systematic fashion. The sequence <strong>of</strong>acquisition <strong>of</strong> syntax and morphology, <strong>the</strong> manner in which <strong>the</strong>se develop, and <strong>the</strong> development<strong>of</strong> phonology all appear to proceed in a somewhat consistent and systematic fashion.Evidence for <strong>the</strong> biological foundation <strong>of</strong> grammatical acquisition came with <strong>the</strong> discovery thatgrammatical morpheme acquisition appears to progress in an orderly fashion (Brown, 1973).Brown observed <strong>the</strong> grammatical development <strong>of</strong> three children, Adam, Eve and Sarah, over aperiod <strong>of</strong> several years and discovered that <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first 14 grammaticalmorphemes was <strong>the</strong> same for all three children. Table 6-1 lists <strong>the</strong>se morphemes in <strong>the</strong>ir order <strong>of</strong>appearance. Ano<strong>the</strong>r classic study also found striking similarities in <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong>morphological acquisition among native-English speaking children (deVilliers & deVilliers,1973).Figure 6-1Brown’s first 14 Morphemespresent progressive -ing (without auxiliary)“in”“on”regular plural –sirregular pastpossessive – suncontractible copula (to be as main verb)ar<strong>ticle</strong>sregular past –edregular 3 rd personirregular 3 rd personuncontractible auxiliarycontractible copulacontractible auxiliary<strong>In</strong> addition to determining <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> grammatical morphemes in English, <strong>the</strong>research by Brown (1973) and deVilliers and deVilliers (1973) was also important inestablishing parameters for when <strong>the</strong>se morphemes should appear, in terms <strong>of</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> language© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved87
- Page 2 and 3:
"Those who arrive by age 12 or 13 m
- Page 5:
Article I.2 Are Signed Languages "R
- Page 8 and 9:
Biological analyses of the status o
- Page 10 and 11:
and beyond, speaking and signing ch
- Page 12 and 13:
Conclusion: Are Signed Languages Re
- Page 14 and 15:
Article I.3 The Interpreter: Has a
- Page 16 and 17:
A few weeks earlier, I had called F
- Page 18 and 19:
“We struggled even getting to the
- Page 20 and 21:
herself by strapping a cassette rec
- Page 22 and 23:
In 1998, after nine years as the ch
- Page 24 and 25:
momentary burst of excitement that
- Page 26 and 27:
can shape core grammar. Because the
- Page 28 and 29:
The authors compared animal and hum
- Page 30 and 31:
monkey moved. He followed it with h
- Page 32 and 33:
delight, fear, laughter, and surpri
- Page 34 and 35:
Piipaío in a hut: Pirahã huts typ
- Page 36 and 37: LEP students, and equitable organiz
- Page 38 and 39: 4. Second language development crea
- Page 41 and 42: curriculum or "teaching to the test
- Page 43 and 44: portfolio work was scanned and stor
- Page 45 and 46: experiences of many groups of stude
- Page 47 and 48: While not disagreeing that interpre
- Page 49 and 50: sound educational practice, however
- Page 51 and 52: arises from the efforts to abstract
- Page 53 and 54: Article II.2 Cross-Cultural Communi
- Page 55 and 56: males who can serve as positive rol
- Page 57 and 58: Understanding another culture is a
- Page 59 and 60: Pets and AnimalsWhich animals are v
- Page 61 and 62: to teach standard English is reflec
- Page 63 and 64: Asking personal questions of a pers
- Page 65 and 66: Using Cross Cultural Communication
- Page 67 and 68: Why Do Nonstandard English-Speaking
- Page 69 and 70: Before beginning to teach standard
- Page 71 and 72: • Negative attitudes toward low p
- Page 73 and 74: New standardized tests and assessme
- Page 75 and 76: Each of the behaviors listed above
- Page 77 and 78: Article II.3 Hard Work Hypothesis:
- Page 79 and 80: each point higher in SES, students
- Page 81 and 82: This case does not provide strong s
- Page 83 and 84: Article II.4 Language Acquisition a
- Page 85: 1992, p. XI). These researchers, wh
- Page 89 and 90: more to the truthfulness of the chi
- Page 91 and 92: This idea of “semilingualism” c
- Page 93 and 94: Article III.1 A Brief Description o
- Page 95 and 96: take different lengths of time to c
- Page 97 and 98: example, should involve the same co
- Page 99 and 100: As with all stages of BICS acquisit
- Page 101 and 102: Assessment techniques at stage 3 ca
- Page 103 and 104: different. Therefore, the social di
- Page 105: integrative motivation. Basically,
- Page 109 and 110: (Ellis, 1985; Hakuta, 1986). Howeve
- Page 111 and 112: that sociocultural processes have o
- Page 113 and 114: Article III.3 How Children Acquire
- Page 115 and 116: phonetic units (unique to signed la
- Page 117 and 118: Article III.4 Toward a Sociocultura
- Page 119 and 120: emember is that the fundamental goa
- Page 121 and 122: The best practices models can be th
- Page 123 and 124: By focusing on the dialectic betwee
- Page 125 and 126: intergenerational wisdom shared by
- Page 127 and 128: Daily Realities RecappedThe above v
- Page 129 and 130: traditions. At a time in our histor
- Page 131 and 132: We will now look at two examples of
- Page 133 and 134: Speakers communicate fluently, main
- Page 135 and 136: question the effects of such attitu
- Page 137 and 138:
Article IV.3 Culture Change: Effect
- Page 139 and 140:
and psychological characteristics o
- Page 141 and 142:
Contraryto what wewere expecting, t
- Page 143 and 144:
Article V.1 Assessment in ESL & Bil
- Page 145 and 146:
vocabulary does the student lack?Is
- Page 147 and 148:
whether they are LEP and to provide
- Page 149 and 150:
Fourth, ESL and bilingual program s
- Page 151 and 152:
competent reader/writer. All versio
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 1Comparison of Recent Accultu
- Page 155 and 156:
unilinear model, which measures the
- Page 157 and 158:
an English-only instructional progr
- Page 159 and 160:
Article V.3 Assessment of English L
- Page 161 and 162:
8. Change answers only for a very g
- Page 163 and 164:
Riles, 1979; Jose P. v Ambac, 1983)
- Page 165 and 166:
proficiency is often underestimated
- Page 167 and 168:
Finally, when second language reade
- Page 169 and 170:
for their decisions, noting issues
- Page 171 and 172:
As mentioned above, when the transi
- Page 173 and 174:
ather than generic adjectives and t
- Page 175 and 176:
their imagined points of view. Ther
- Page 177 and 178:
English texts and demonstrate progr
- Page 179:
using inter-district teams). In the