12.07.2015 Views

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Through a continuous progress mode, assessments must measure au<strong>the</strong>ntic work <strong>of</strong> students andinvolve <strong>the</strong>m and <strong>the</strong>ir parents in <strong>the</strong> process. Such an internal mechanism may lead tocontinuous improvement in which all staff have an opportunity to examine student work acrosslevels--not just <strong>the</strong>ir own students'--with <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> continually reevaluating not only studentprogress, but <strong>the</strong> assessment practices as well.Performance assessment is an individual process. <strong>Un</strong>like traditional forms <strong>of</strong> assessment thatforce placement <strong>of</strong> students in ranks, along a curve or in a graded system, it evalu<strong>ates</strong> <strong>the</strong>student's progress along his or her own developmental path. Students begin taking responsibilityfor <strong>the</strong>ir own learning by being intimately involved in <strong>the</strong> assessment process.Linked very closely to <strong>the</strong> schoolwide assessment practices is <strong>the</strong> accountability challenge.Schools going through <strong>the</strong> reforming process are facing <strong>the</strong> dilemma <strong>of</strong> being held accountablefor improvements in student achievement through standardized test results while beingencouraged to move into au<strong>the</strong>ntic and performance-based assessments. Consequently, <strong>the</strong>challenge for schools is to learn how to develop program evaluations that incorporate indicatorssuch as those provided by portfolio assessment. An added challenge is how to extrapolateau<strong>the</strong>ntic assessment data to provide accountability information to <strong>the</strong> public, parents and o<strong>the</strong>ragencies. Can school personnel and <strong>the</strong>ir communities learn how to link norm-referenced dataand performance-based assessments, and make sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information in a way that will givelegitimacy to <strong>the</strong> data?ExampleOne <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most significant changes that occurred at Linda Vista was <strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> aschoolwide assessment system. The evolution took place as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vision that had as itsgoal <strong>the</strong> high-level achievement <strong>of</strong> all students through a developmentally appropriate,continuous progress teaching and learning process. As we said at Linda Vista, <strong>the</strong> experiencebegets <strong>the</strong> process. It was inevitable that an alternative assessment process would evolve from<strong>the</strong> staff's commitment to continuous progress. The following steps were taken:* Step 1: The staff embarked upon <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> developing language arts standards for all <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> age grouping and language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency levels in <strong>the</strong> instructional design. This task emergedas <strong>the</strong> logical starting point since 77 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> students were English language learners.Subsequently, math standards were also developed. Although <strong>the</strong> goals set for all students werebased on California state frameworks and district expectations, benchmarks along <strong>the</strong> way weretargeted in <strong>the</strong> school's assessment design. For example, learner outcomes for <strong>the</strong> non-Englishspeaking student or <strong>the</strong> student transitioning into formal English reading were delineated tomaintain ongoing monitoring <strong>of</strong> student progress.* Step 2: Maintaining portfolios for each student was <strong>the</strong> method chosen for assessingwhe<strong>the</strong>r students reached <strong>the</strong> standards. This would be a school-wide expectation with <strong>the</strong>appropriate portfolio contents outlined in <strong>the</strong> assessment document for each level.* Step 3: Rubrics were <strong>the</strong>n developed as a scale <strong>of</strong> descriptors for all student work. Thesewere designed around <strong>the</strong> developmental levels: Early Childhood, Primary, Middle and Upper.No grades, numbers, or scale rankings were used.* Step 4: The standard district progress report was changed to reflect <strong>the</strong> continuousprogress design. On <strong>the</strong> report, rubrics were checked for each reporting period. The report wasaccompanied by a hard copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> student's portfolio that contained <strong>the</strong> appropriate work for <strong>the</strong>quarter. Each piece <strong>of</strong> work had an assigned rubric and <strong>the</strong> teacher decided, <strong>of</strong>ten with studentinput, <strong>the</strong> final rubric for <strong>the</strong> progress report. A hard copy was given to <strong>the</strong> parents since all© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!