12.07.2015 Views

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

Art Un ticle I.1 ited Sta In the ates News - Woodring College of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

doing because it is such a normal part <strong>of</strong> communication. When we are talking with a friend andusing informal speech and <strong>the</strong>n start speaking more formally when <strong>the</strong> boss walks by, we areengaging in “code-switching.” Research suggests that bilingual children are able to differentiatebetween <strong>the</strong>ir two languages at a very early age, even as young as age two (Lindholm & Padilla,1978; Meisel, 1987). Therefore, we can conclude that <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> two different languages, as wellas a range <strong>of</strong> social styles, merely makes a bilingual individual able to communicate in a widerrange <strong>of</strong> social contexts. Depending on <strong>the</strong> social situation and <strong>the</strong> community norms, bilingualcode-switching may be more or less prevalent. However, regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> codeswitching,it should not be taken as evidence that a child is “semilingual.”Summary<strong>In</strong> this chapter, <strong>the</strong> foundations for first and second language acquisition were reviewed. Centralconcepts in linguistic and child language were presented and discussed in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irimplications for second language acquisition. The similarities and differences between first andsecond language acquisition were delineated. Three current <strong>the</strong>ories <strong>of</strong> second languageacquisition, those developed by Krashen (1981), Wong Fillmore (1991a), and Cummins (1981)were summarized and <strong>the</strong>ir central tenets were compared with <strong>the</strong> research literature forfeasibility. <strong>In</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information presented on linguistic fundamentals and first and secondlanguage acquisition, <strong>the</strong> four common fallacies which were presented at <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>chapter were revis<strong>ited</strong>. These were considered with regard to CLD students both with andwithout disabilities. The information presented in this chapter should allow <strong>the</strong> reader to makemore informed observations and assessment and intervention decisions regarding CLD studentsin <strong>the</strong> schools.© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!