intensive learning and behavior interventions for culturally/linguistically diverse students ra<strong>the</strong>rthan referring <strong>the</strong>m to an evaluation and staffing. The AQS is also useful for substantiatingdecisions to modify testing evaluation and assessment procedures. <strong>In</strong> general, students scoring at<strong>the</strong> lower acculturation levels should not be assessed with standardized assessment instrumentswithout case-specific modification <strong>of</strong> administration and interpretation. The AQS providesdocumentation and guidance to school psychologists and o<strong>the</strong>r evaluation specialists workingwith culturally/linguistically diverse students.The AQS should be administered at least four weeks after students have entered <strong>the</strong> school. Thiswill allow <strong>the</strong> user to assess <strong>the</strong>ir language abilities and to obtain previous school records. Thisfirst AQS will be <strong>the</strong> baseline from which to measure rate and level <strong>of</strong> acculturation. Studentsshould be assessed every year at <strong>the</strong> same time to obtain an ongoing record and documentation <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir rate <strong>of</strong> adaptation to <strong>the</strong> school system. The results map against a range from lessacculturated to more acculturated on a 48-point scale. The AQS measures five levels <strong>of</strong>acculturation: Significantly Less Acculturated, Less Acculturated, <strong>In</strong> Transition, MoreAcculturated, and Significantly More Acculturated. The average rate <strong>of</strong> acculturation is between10% to 12% each school year, depending upon type <strong>of</strong> program <strong>of</strong>fered to students. Studentsfrom diverse cultural and linguistic backgrounds will vary in <strong>the</strong>ir rate and level <strong>of</strong> acculturationto public school culture, but all are affected by various factors. These include individualcharacteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> students and <strong>the</strong>ir school.Although any student may be measured with AQS, it is most useful for students who come froma cultural or linguistic background that differs significantly from <strong>the</strong> mainstream <strong>of</strong> his or herparticular public school. For example, <strong>the</strong> AQS will be useful with an American student from anethnically, linguistically or racially diverse background who may be demonstrating learning orbehavior difficulties. It also provides a significant pr<strong>of</strong>ile for placement <strong>of</strong> refugee or immigrantstudents.The AQS is based on research conducted in rural and urban school districts concerning <strong>the</strong>referral and placement <strong>of</strong> lim<strong>ited</strong> English pr<strong>of</strong>icient children <strong>of</strong> migrant, refugee and immigrantfamilies. The original study population was a random sample <strong>of</strong> students in grades K-8 who wereidentified as Hispanic and lim<strong>ited</strong> English pr<strong>of</strong>icient by <strong>the</strong>ir districts. The results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studyshowed that perceptions <strong>of</strong> acculturation contributed to decisions to refer and place <strong>the</strong>sestudents. Additionally, it was found that student characteristics could be used to accuratelyidentify and monitor level and rate <strong>of</strong> acculturation among at-risk students. Later <strong>the</strong> AQS wasmodified for use with o<strong>the</strong>r linguistically and culturally diverse populations. The AQS has beenused by school systems to monitor and plan assistance to at-risk students from Native American,Asian American, African American, and o<strong>the</strong>r culturally and linguistically diverse populations.The information needed to complete <strong>the</strong> AQS is as follows:1. Number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>the</strong> student has been in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Un</strong><strong>ited</strong> <strong>Sta</strong>tes.2. Number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>the</strong> student has been in <strong>the</strong> current school: This should be actualcumulative time in this school to <strong>the</strong> extent possible.3. Number <strong>of</strong> school years <strong>the</strong> student has received direct instruction in bilingual or Englishas a Second Language classes: This should be actual cumulative time in this instruction to <strong>the</strong>extent possible. Using school records, interviews with parents or o<strong>the</strong>r teachers, identify howmuch time, if any, <strong>the</strong> student has spent in direct instruction in bilingual education or English asa second language (ESL) classes. For example, a student in a dual language program receiving atleast an hour each day <strong>of</strong> direct instruction in ESL in <strong>the</strong> content area would have received a fullyear in ESL/Bilingual instruction by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> school year. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a student in© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved156
an English-only instructional program, receiving a half hour or less pull out assistance inlanguage transition once or twice a week is clearly not receiving a year’s instruction in a year’stime. Determining <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> cumulative time may be difficult, but <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is thatpull out, lim<strong>ited</strong> time assistance, accumul<strong>ates</strong> at about half <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> longer time, dailyassistance. This may be “Newcomers” classes or classes for students <strong>of</strong> lim<strong>ited</strong> Englishpr<strong>of</strong>iciency.4. Degree <strong>of</strong> language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in <strong>the</strong> native language or dialect: Using formal or locallanguage tests, observations, informal assessment instruments, and interviews with parents andschool personnel, identify <strong>the</strong> relative level <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>the</strong> student has in <strong>the</strong> native languageor dialect. This may be a recognized linguistic variation <strong>of</strong> English, distinct for this student’sethnic background and/or traditional community.5. Degree <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in English: Using standardized or local language tests, observations,informal assessment instruments, and interviews with parents and school personnel, identify <strong>the</strong>relative level <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>the</strong> student has in “standard” English or <strong>the</strong> English used in a schooland by <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> school personnel. This represents <strong>the</strong> “second language” or secondarycommunication modality to which this student is acculturating.6. Degree <strong>of</strong> bilingual pr<strong>of</strong>iciency: Using formal or local language tests, observations, informalassessment instruments, and/or interviews with parents and school personnel, identify <strong>the</strong>relative level <strong>of</strong> balanced pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>the</strong> student has in both English and <strong>the</strong> student’s nativelanguage or dialects. This may be a recognized linguistic variation <strong>of</strong> English, distinct for thisstudent’s ethnic background and/or traditional community.7. Ethnicity or national origin: Using information from intake personnel, or intakeinformation, interviews with <strong>the</strong> student, parents and teachers, identify how <strong>the</strong> student views hisethnicity or national origin. This gives an indication <strong>of</strong> his or her cultural awareness and selfidentity.The multiple terms reflect differences in self-identification to some extent, though dueto economy <strong>of</strong> space, only a few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> many variations <strong>of</strong> self-reference are included. EastAsian refers to populations and countries around or to <strong>the</strong> north and east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bay <strong>of</strong> Bengaland West Asian refers to populations and countries around or to <strong>the</strong> north and west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Arabian Sea. Moreover, this item gives an indication <strong>of</strong> how prepared <strong>the</strong> school system is toadapt to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> this particular student and how likely it is that <strong>the</strong> curriculum/system is tobe effective for this student. Research has shown that, in general, public schools and schoolpersonnel are less prepared to work effectively with particular groups <strong>of</strong> diverse students,particularly when <strong>the</strong>ir presence in <strong>the</strong> schools is infrequent or <strong>of</strong> “low incidence”. This does notmean an individual teacher, specialist or school is not doing as well as possible, but curricula andteacher training programs show measurable differences in <strong>the</strong>ir responsiveness to particularethnic/linguistic populations. This item is a broad indicator <strong>of</strong> issues that make acculturationmore stressful for particular students in mainstream public school systems.8. Percent in school speaking student’s language/dialect: Using information from district andbuilding level personnel, identify how many <strong>of</strong> this student’s particular cultural community areenrolled in <strong>the</strong> school. This is specific to <strong>the</strong> student, i.e., if <strong>the</strong> student is Navajo, how manyo<strong>the</strong>r Navajo students are in <strong>the</strong> school. If this is <strong>the</strong> only Navajo student in <strong>the</strong> school, <strong>the</strong>evaluator would note a nearly 0% enrollment even if <strong>the</strong>re are several students from o<strong>the</strong>rAmerican <strong>In</strong>dian tribes in <strong>the</strong> school. <strong>In</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words, counting “Native Alaskans” or “NativeAmericans” is incorrect here; how many students come from this student’s particularcultural/linguistic community is important. This will also give an indication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree towhich this student is at risk for stress factors such as alienation and isolation, and possible© 2008 Dr. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine CollierAll Rights Reserved157
- Page 2 and 3:
"Those who arrive by age 12 or 13 m
- Page 5:
Article I.2 Are Signed Languages "R
- Page 8 and 9:
Biological analyses of the status o
- Page 10 and 11:
and beyond, speaking and signing ch
- Page 12 and 13:
Conclusion: Are Signed Languages Re
- Page 14 and 15:
Article I.3 The Interpreter: Has a
- Page 16 and 17:
A few weeks earlier, I had called F
- Page 18 and 19:
“We struggled even getting to the
- Page 20 and 21:
herself by strapping a cassette rec
- Page 22 and 23:
In 1998, after nine years as the ch
- Page 24 and 25:
momentary burst of excitement that
- Page 26 and 27:
can shape core grammar. Because the
- Page 28 and 29:
The authors compared animal and hum
- Page 30 and 31:
monkey moved. He followed it with h
- Page 32 and 33:
delight, fear, laughter, and surpri
- Page 34 and 35:
Piipaío in a hut: Pirahã huts typ
- Page 36 and 37:
LEP students, and equitable organiz
- Page 38 and 39:
4. Second language development crea
- Page 41 and 42:
curriculum or "teaching to the test
- Page 43 and 44:
portfolio work was scanned and stor
- Page 45 and 46:
experiences of many groups of stude
- Page 47 and 48:
While not disagreeing that interpre
- Page 49 and 50:
sound educational practice, however
- Page 51 and 52:
arises from the efforts to abstract
- Page 53 and 54:
Article II.2 Cross-Cultural Communi
- Page 55 and 56:
males who can serve as positive rol
- Page 57 and 58:
Understanding another culture is a
- Page 59 and 60:
Pets and AnimalsWhich animals are v
- Page 61 and 62:
to teach standard English is reflec
- Page 63 and 64:
Asking personal questions of a pers
- Page 65 and 66:
Using Cross Cultural Communication
- Page 67 and 68:
Why Do Nonstandard English-Speaking
- Page 69 and 70:
Before beginning to teach standard
- Page 71 and 72:
• Negative attitudes toward low p
- Page 73 and 74:
New standardized tests and assessme
- Page 75 and 76:
Each of the behaviors listed above
- Page 77 and 78:
Article II.3 Hard Work Hypothesis:
- Page 79 and 80:
each point higher in SES, students
- Page 81 and 82:
This case does not provide strong s
- Page 83 and 84:
Article II.4 Language Acquisition a
- Page 85 and 86:
1992, p. XI). These researchers, wh
- Page 87 and 88:
comprehend a word within a specific
- Page 89 and 90:
more to the truthfulness of the chi
- Page 91 and 92:
This idea of “semilingualism” c
- Page 93 and 94:
Article III.1 A Brief Description o
- Page 95 and 96:
take different lengths of time to c
- Page 97 and 98:
example, should involve the same co
- Page 99 and 100:
As with all stages of BICS acquisit
- Page 101 and 102:
Assessment techniques at stage 3 ca
- Page 103 and 104:
different. Therefore, the social di
- Page 105: integrative motivation. Basically,
- Page 109 and 110: (Ellis, 1985; Hakuta, 1986). Howeve
- Page 111 and 112: that sociocultural processes have o
- Page 113 and 114: Article III.3 How Children Acquire
- Page 115 and 116: phonetic units (unique to signed la
- Page 117 and 118: Article III.4 Toward a Sociocultura
- Page 119 and 120: emember is that the fundamental goa
- Page 121 and 122: The best practices models can be th
- Page 123 and 124: By focusing on the dialectic betwee
- Page 125 and 126: intergenerational wisdom shared by
- Page 127 and 128: Daily Realities RecappedThe above v
- Page 129 and 130: traditions. At a time in our histor
- Page 131 and 132: We will now look at two examples of
- Page 133 and 134: Speakers communicate fluently, main
- Page 135 and 136: question the effects of such attitu
- Page 137 and 138: Article IV.3 Culture Change: Effect
- Page 139 and 140: and psychological characteristics o
- Page 141 and 142: Contraryto what wewere expecting, t
- Page 143 and 144: Article V.1 Assessment in ESL & Bil
- Page 145 and 146: vocabulary does the student lack?Is
- Page 147 and 148: whether they are LEP and to provide
- Page 149 and 150: Fourth, ESL and bilingual program s
- Page 151 and 152: competent reader/writer. All versio
- Page 153 and 154: Table 1Comparison of Recent Accultu
- Page 155: unilinear model, which measures the
- Page 159 and 160: Article V.3 Assessment of English L
- Page 161 and 162: 8. Change answers only for a very g
- Page 163 and 164: Riles, 1979; Jose P. v Ambac, 1983)
- Page 165 and 166: proficiency is often underestimated
- Page 167 and 168: Finally, when second language reade
- Page 169 and 170: for their decisions, noting issues
- Page 171 and 172: As mentioned above, when the transi
- Page 173 and 174: ather than generic adjectives and t
- Page 175 and 176: their imagined points of view. Ther
- Page 177 and 178: English texts and demonstrate progr
- Page 179: using inter-district teams). In the