Similarly, it was shown previously that drivers of lighter and more powerful vehicleswere over-involved in crashes (Bener et al., 2006). Traffic composition on highways even inLMICs is significantly different from the cities, and passengers of such vehicles account for amajority of traffic injuries (Sobngwi-Tambekou et al., 2010). Furthermore, a low seat-belt anda high cell phone use reflected the low hazard perception observed in those driving suchvehicles (Perneger & Smith, 1991). These results indicated that improving hazard awarenessby enforcement and road measures might be useful in reducing crash risk in relativelyvulnerable groups (Rosenbloom, Shahar, Elharar, & Danino, 2008).Lastly, the high hazard perception of Cameroonian sites compared to Pakistani sitescould be explained by several factors. Firstly, the traffic was separated in Pakistan comparedto non-separated in Cameroon. A higher hazard perception was observed for maintenancezones in Pakistan, where traffic was not separated (Lewis-Evans & Charlton, 2006; Morgan,Duley, & Hancock). Further, mountainous terrain, unfamiliarity with the road section, andright-hand drive could augment the hazard perception for Cameroonian sites among Pakistanidrivers (McKenna, Horswill, & Alexan<strong>de</strong>r, 2006; Sagberg & Bjornskau, 2006). Areproduction of this study with Cameroonian drivers might help to assess the impact offamiliarity on hazard perception (McKenna et al., 1991).The study may have several limitations. Firstly, police un<strong>de</strong>rreporting of crashesmight have resulted in a small sample size to select high-risk sites (World HealthOrganization, 2009). Secondly, selection of voluntary drivers could lead to a pru<strong>de</strong>nt driversample (Delhomme, 1991). Thirdly, drivers may respond higher hazard perception for sites inPakistan known to them as high-risk ones (Lewis-Evans & Charlton, 2006). These biasesmight lead to high hazard perception of high-risk sites.In conclusion, the study methods provi<strong>de</strong>d an opportunity to i<strong>de</strong>ntify high-risk siteswith poor hazard perception features (Milleville-Pennel et al., 2007). These results showedthat implementing cost effective interventions such as hazard signs at those sites could reducetraffic speeds (Rosenbloom et al., 2008). These methods could be useful to assess expectedimpact of such interventions at those sites (Milleville-Pennel et al., 2007). Furthermore, thesemight help in <strong>de</strong>veloping and implementing specific interventions adapted to local settings inHICs and LMICs (Jamison, Mosley, Measham, & Bobadilla, 1993). Feasibility of thesemethods however, remains to be assessed.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAuthors are especially thankful to Dr. Aftab Ahmed PATHAN (NHMP), Mr. IrshadSODHAR (NHMP), Mr. Naeemullah SHIEKH (NHMP), Mr. Javed SHAH (AKU), Dr.Sanaullah BASHIR (AKU), and Dr. Kiran EJAZ (AKU) for their support in data collection.Authors would like to thank all the drivers who participated in the hazard perception studyand the owners of transport agencies who provi<strong>de</strong>d us the space to conduct the interviews.FUNDINGFirst author is the PhD candidate at Université Victor Segalen Bor<strong>de</strong>aux 2. This position isfun<strong>de</strong>d by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. Institut National <strong>de</strong> la Santé et <strong>de</strong> laRecherche Médicale Unité 897, France, fun<strong>de</strong>d the logistics for data collection. Fundingbodies had no input in study <strong>de</strong>sign, analysis and interpretation of results.REFERENCES130
Afukaar, F. K. (2003). Speed control in <strong>de</strong>veloping countries: issues, challenges andopportunities in reducing road traffic injuries. Inj Control Saf Promot, 10(1-2), 77-81.Benda, H. V., & Hoyos, C. G. (1983). Estimating hazards in traffic situations. Accid AnalPrev, 15(1), 1-9.Bener, A., Ghaffar, A., Azab, A., Sankaran-Kutty, M., Toth, F., & Lovasz, G. (2006). Theimpact of four-wheel drives on traffic disability and <strong>de</strong>aths compared to passenger cars. J CollPhysicians Surg Pak, 16(4), 257-260.Bhatti, J. A., Sobngwi-Tambekou, J., Lagar<strong>de</strong>, E., & Salmi, L. R. Situational factorsassociated with road traffic crashes: A case-control study on the Yaoun<strong>de</strong>-Douala roadsection, Cameroon. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 1-8.Bishai, D., Asiimwe, B., Abbas, S., Hy<strong>de</strong>r, A. A., & Bazeyo, W. (2008). Cost-effectiveness oftraffic enforcement: case study from Uganda. Inj Prev, 14(4), 223-227.Damsere-Derry, J., Afukaar, F. K., Donkor, P., & Mock, C. (2008). Assessment of vehiclespeeds on different categories of roadways in Ghana. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 15(2), 83-91.Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. J Safety Res,30(4), 225-236.DeJoy, D. M. (1989). The optimism bias and traffic acci<strong>de</strong>nt risk perception. Accid Anal Prev,21(4), 333-340.Delhomme, P. (1991). Comparing one's driving with others': assessment of abilities andfrequency of offences. Evi<strong>de</strong>nce for a superior conformity of self-bias? Accid Anal Prev,23(6), 493-508.Elvik, R. (2008). A survey of operational <strong>de</strong>finitions of hazardous road locations in someEuropean countries. Accid Anal Prev, 40(6), 1830-1835.Finn, P., & Bragg, B. W. (1986). Perception of the risk of an acci<strong>de</strong>nt by young and ol<strong>de</strong>rdrivers. Accid Anal Prev, 18(4), 289-298.Flahault, A., Cadilhac, M., & Thomas, G. (2005). Sample size calculation should beperformed for <strong>de</strong>sign accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epi<strong>de</strong>miol, 58(8), 859-862.Geurts, K., & Wets, G. (2003). Black Spot Analysis Methods: Literature Review (No. RA-2003-07). Diepenbeek: Steunpunt Verkeersveiligheid Bij Stijgen<strong>de</strong> Mobiliteit.Geurts, K., Wets, G., Brijs, T., Vanhoof, K., & Karlis, D. (2006). Ranking and selectingdangerous crash locations: correcting for the number of passengers and Bayesian rankingplots. J Safety Res, 37(1), 83-91.Gol<strong>de</strong>nbeld, C., & van Schagen, I. (2007). The credibility of speed limits on 80 km/h ruralroads: The effects of road and person(ality) characteristics. Accid Anal Prev, 39(6), 1121-1130.Harre, N. (2000). Risk evaluation, driving, and adolescents: a typology. Dev Rev, 20, 206-226.Hijar, M., Carrillo, C., Flores, M., Anaya, R., & Lopez, V. (2000). Risk factors in highwaytraffic acci<strong>de</strong>nts: a case control study. Accid Anal Prev, 32(5), 703-709.Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (Second ed.). Danvers,MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Jamison, D. T., Mosley, W. H., Measham, A. B., & Bobadilla, J. L. (Eds.). (1993). DiseaseControl Priorities in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.Kanellaidis, G., Zervas, A., & Karagioules, V. (2000). Drivers' Risk Perception of RoadDesign Elements. Transportation Human Factors, 2(1), 39-48.Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. Driver's visual attention as a function ofdriving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movementsin day, night and rain driving. Accid Anal Prev, 42(3), 827-834.Lewis-Evans, B., & Charlton, S. G. (2006). Explicit and implicit processes in behaviouraladaptation to road width. Accid Anal Prev, 38(3), 610-617.131
- Page 1:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5:
Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7:
Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9:
AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11:
AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13:
L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15:
2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17:
2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19:
Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21:
2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23:
ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25:
ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29:
Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 30 and 31:
MethodsThe study setting was 196-km
- Page 32 and 33:
patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 36 and 37:
5. Analytical StudiesPrevious liter
- Page 38 and 39:
under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43:
MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45:
to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47:
normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49:
MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51:
Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53:
located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57:
6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59:
Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61:
observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63:
to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65:
[24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67:
[69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 68 and 69:
[111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Va
- Page 70 and 71:
[154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73:
4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75:
Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77:
they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79:
more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81: Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89: Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 90 and 91: BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the
- Page 92 and 93: patients were recorded during their
- Page 94 and 95: This might motivate police officers
- Page 96 and 97: 12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99: Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101: Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103: Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105: 104
- Page 106 and 107: 106
- Page 108 and 109: 108
- Page 110 and 111: Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113: 1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115: A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117: conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119: 21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121: Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123: 122
- Page 124 and 125: ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127: oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129: SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 132 and 133: Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135: Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137: Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139: Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141: Table 23. Situational factors assoc