MethodsThe study setting was 196-km long Karachi-Hala road section (km 16 to km 212 fromKarachi city centre). This is a four-lane highway, two lanes in each direction. The lanes areseparated by a ground surface, but there are no physical barriers. It has one of the highesttraffic counts in the province, with over 24,000 vehicles per day [83]. This high traffic countcan be explained by the economic activity in Karachi, the most populous city of Pakistan,which accounts for 70% of the government’s revenue through tra<strong>de</strong> and industry [84]. In thisretrospective study, information on traffic injuries reported to Police, ambulance service, andED during 2008 (Jan to Dec) was collected and compared.Police dataSince 2004, the National Highway & Motorway Police (NHMP) ensures traffic enforcementon this 196-km long road section. Administratively, this section is consi<strong>de</strong>red as Sector I ofSouth-Zone of NHMP and is divi<strong>de</strong>d further in four 46- to 51-km-long beats: beat 35 (km 16to 62), beat 34 (63 to 114), beat 33 (115 to 162), and beat 32 (163 to 212). NHMP <strong>de</strong>ploysfour motor vehicles and four patrolling officers in an eight-hour shift on these beats [10].For every crash, a standard acci<strong>de</strong>nt analysis report is filed by the attending NHMP officer[85]. A copy of this report is kept in the NHMP regional office. Similarly, <strong>de</strong>tails on crash andthose involved are recor<strong>de</strong>d on a separate acci<strong>de</strong>nt register. From these reports and registers,information was principally extracted on time, date, location of crash, and whether it wasfatal, involved injury, or was without injury. Similarly, we extracted information on name,age, sex, outcome (<strong>de</strong>ad; severe injury, <strong>de</strong>fined as transported to hospital; and mild injury,<strong>de</strong>fined as not transported to hospital), and hospital brought to (when available) of thoseinvolved in crashes.Ambulance dataAmbulance records were obtained from Edhi Ambulance Service (EAS) logbooks. EAS is thelargest private philanthropic ambulance service in the world [86]. EAS has been providingambulance service to injury patients on this road section for the last 15-20 years. For thispurpose, EAS has established six ambulance posts, mostly near main towns, to provi<strong>de</strong> care totraffic injury patients. Location of these posts are: 1) Sohrab Goth (12 km from Karachicentre), 2) Karachi toll plaza (km 28), 3) Edhi centre (km 56), 4) Nooriabad (km 94), 5) HalaNaka (km 160), and 6) Hala (km 212). This service is freely available to injury patients, andfunds are raised by transporting other patients. Ambulance staff consists of, in most cases,only the driver. A clerk at the post can accompany the driver if he thinks this justified, forinstance in case of crash with multiple patients. Ambulance communicates with emergencypost through wireless system or by cell phone.RTI patients or bystan<strong>de</strong>rs can contact the services using the free emergency access number115, which connects them to the main city centre [86]. Information is then transmitted bywireless or cell phone to nearby posts, which finally dispatches the ambulance(s). Afterreaching the scene, attendants separate injured and <strong>de</strong>ad patients. Those severely injured aretransported to the nearest hospital; preference is given to the government hospital if available.All information on the RTI intervention including crash location, RTI patient i<strong>de</strong>ntity andoutcome is then transmitted by wireless or telephone to the regional centre, which records theinformation in a central log book. We obtained these log books from the regional centre atKarachi. Crash <strong>de</strong>tails such as date, time, location, and whether it was fatal or involved injurywere extracted from these books. Similarly, road user <strong>de</strong>tails such as name, sex, age, user type(pe<strong>de</strong>strian, motorcycle ri<strong>de</strong>r, or vehicle occupant), and outcome (died, including when the30
person died at crash scene, during transport, or at ED; injured and transported, includinghospital taken to; injured and not transported) were extracted from these books.Hospital recordsThe Road Traffic Injury Research & Prevention Centre (RTIRP) at the Jinnah Post GraduateMedical Centre (JPMC) has been working since September 2006 [87]. This centresystematically collects, on standard Performa sheets, information on RTI patients presentingat the ED of the five largest teaching hospitals in Karachi: 1) JPMC, 2) Abbasi ShaheedHospital, 3) Civil Hospital Karachi, 4) Liaqat National Hospital, and 5) The Aga KhanUniversity Hospital.This dataset inclu<strong>de</strong>s information on the crash date, time, and location as well as patient’sname, age, sex, road user group. Further information on whether the patient was wearinghelmet or seat belt was available. The New Injury Severity Score (NISS) [88] and outcome(discharged, admitted/referred, or died) of patients were recor<strong>de</strong>d during their stay in the ED.Information on RTI patients involved in crashes on selected road section was extracted fromthis dataset.AnalysisAll information was recor<strong>de</strong>d on Excel® spreadsheets. We computed percentages for crashand injury patient characteristics for three datasets and compared them with each other. Forthe ED dataset, the distribution of NISS according to the outcome was plotted. Records fromthe three datasets were then matched for crash date, name, age, and sex of RTI patientsinvolved. For matched records, we i<strong>de</strong>ntified changes in outcome. Total <strong>de</strong>aths and injurieswere then assessed while removing the records appearing in two or more datasets.Ascertainment rates for police, ambulance, and ED records as compared to these totalfatalities and injuries were computed. Unique record and traffic counts from NationalHighway Authority (NHA) were used to compute overall traffic fatality and injury rates pervehicle-km for 2008 [83].ResultsCrash outcomeIn 2008, police reported 43 crashes, whereas 255 crashes were reported to EAS and 449 werereported to ED. One out of two police reported crashes (N=19, 44.4%) was fatal, whereas thisproportion was 14.5% (N=37) for those reported to EAS and 10.4% (N=47) for those reportedto ED. No information on crash outcome was available in 13.3% of EAS reported crashes and6.7% of those reported to ED.Injury outcomeA total of 143 RTIs were reported to police, 531 to EAS, and 661 to ED. Monthly trendsindicated higher proportions of RTIs in June and July 2008 (Figure 8). Over half of policereportedinjury patients received hospital care (N=80, 55.9%) (Table 6). Half of these patients(N=40), injured between km 16 and km 120 were treated in Karachi; RTIRP hospitals treated17 of them. Nearly one fifth of RTI patients reported in police records died (N=27, 18.8%),whereas this proportion was 10.4% for EAS and 9.1% for ED reported patients. One fourth ofpolice-reported injury patients (N=25.2%) were not transported to the hospital, whereas thiswas 9.0% for EAS-reported patients (N=48). Out of 661 patients presenting to ED, 47.7%(N=315) arrived by private means, whereas 43.0% (N=284) arrived in ambulances. Policetransported only four of these patients, and no information was available on the remaining 5831
- Page 1: Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5: Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7: Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9: AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11: AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13: L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15: 2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17: 2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21: 2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23: ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25: ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29: Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 32 and 33: patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35: Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 36 and 37: 5. Analytical StudiesPrevious liter
- Page 38 and 39: under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41: Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43: MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45: to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47: normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49: MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53: located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55: Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57: 6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59: Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61: observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63: to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65: [24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67: [69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 68 and 69: [111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Va
- Page 70 and 71: [154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73: 4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77: they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79: more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87:
Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89:
Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 90 and 91:
BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the
- Page 92 and 93:
patients were recorded during their
- Page 94 and 95:
This might motivate police officers
- Page 96 and 97:
12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103:
Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105:
104
- Page 106 and 107:
106
- Page 108 and 109:
108
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113:
1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115:
A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117:
conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119:
21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123:
122
- Page 124 and 125:
ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127:
oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129:
SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 130 and 131:
Similarly, it was shown previously
- Page 132 and 133:
Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139:
Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 23. Situational factors assoc