[111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Vanhoof K, Karlis D. Ranking and selecting dangerouscrash locations: correcting for the number of passengers and Bayesian ranking plots. J SafetyRes. 2006;37(1):83-91.[112] Benda HV, Hoyos CG. Estimating hazards in traffic situations. Accid Anal Prev.1983;15(1):1-9.[113] SWOV. SWOV fact sheet: hazard perception. Leidschendam: SWOV Institute forRoad Safety Research; 2008.[114] DeJoy DM. The optimism bias and traffic acci<strong>de</strong>nt risk perception. Accid Anal Prev.1989 Aug;21(4):333-40.[115] Finn P, Bragg BW. Perception of the risk of an acci<strong>de</strong>nt by young and ol<strong>de</strong>r drivers.Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Aug;18(4):289-98.[116] Harre N. Risk evaluation, driving, and adolescents: a typology. Dev Rev.2000;20:206-26.[117] Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Pak A. Changes in collision rates among novice driversduring the first months of driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35(683-91).[118] McKenna FP, Stanier RA, Lewis C. Factors un<strong>de</strong>rlying illusory self-assessment ofdriving skill in males and females. Accid Anal Prev. 1991;23:45-52.[119] Trankle U, Gelau C, Metker T. Risk perception and age-specific acci<strong>de</strong>nts of youngdrivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1990 Apr;22(2):119-25.[120] Gol<strong>de</strong>nbeld C, van Schagen I. The credibility of speed limits on 80 km/h rural roads:The effects of road and person(ality) characteristics. Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1121-30.[121] Kanellaidis G, Zervas A, Karagioules V. Drivers' risk perception of road <strong>de</strong>signelements. Transp Hum Factors. 2000;2(1):39-48.[122] Deery HA. Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. J Safety Res.1999;30(4):225-36.[123] Rundmo T, Iversen H. Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents intwo Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Sci. 2004;42(1):1-21.[124] Montella A. A comparative analysis of hotspot i<strong>de</strong>ntification methods. Accid AnalPrev. 2010;42(2):571-81.[125] Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for<strong>de</strong>sign accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epi<strong>de</strong>miol. 2005 Aug;58(8):859-62.[126] Bhatti JA, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Lagar<strong>de</strong> E, Salmi LR. Situational factors associatedwith road traffic crashes: A case-control study on the Yaoundé-Douala road section,Cameroon. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010 Mar 30:1-8.[127] Sümer N, Ünal AB, Birdal A, Çinar P, Çevikoglu S. Comparison of self-reported andcomputer-based hazard perception skills among novice and experienced drivers. In: FourthInternational Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training andVehicle Design, 2007, 9-12 July, Stevenson, WA. Washington, DC: Transport ResearchBoard; 2007.[128] Tiwari G, Mohan D, Muhlrad N, eds. The Way Forward: Transportation Planning andRoad Safety. Delhi: McMillan India Ltd; 2005.[129] Bhatti JA, Salmi LR, Lagar<strong>de</strong> E, Razzak JA. Concordance between road mortalityindicators in high-income and low- and middle-income countries. Traffic Inj Prev.Apr;11(2):173-7.[130] Sauerzapf V, Jones AP, Haynes R. The problems in <strong>de</strong>termining international roadmortality. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(2):492-9.[131] Iribhogbe PE, Osime CO. Compliance with seat belt use in Benin City, Nigeria.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):16-9.[132] Sangowawa AO, Alagh BT, Ekanem SE, Ebong IP, Faseru B, A<strong>de</strong>kunle BJ, et al. Anobservational study of seatbelt use among vehicle occupants in Nigeria. Inj Prev. 2010Apr;16(2):85-9.68
[133] Perneger T, Smith GS. The driver's role in fatal two-car crashes: a paired "casecontrol"study. Am J Epi<strong>de</strong>miol. 1991 Nov 15;134(10):1138-45.[134] Bener A, Ghaffar A, Azab A, Sankaran-Kutty M, Toth F, Lovasz G. The impact offour-wheel drives on traffic disability and <strong>de</strong>aths compared to passenger cars. J CollPhysicians Surg Pak. 2006 Apr;16(4):257-60.[135] Jooma R, Khan SJ, Razzak JA. The Trauma Centre: what it should mean. J Pak MedAssoc. 2008 Oct;58(10):530-1.[136] Quansah R. Availability of emergency medical services along major highways. GhanaMed J. 2001;35:8-10.[137] Razzak JA, Cone DC, Rehmani R. Emergency medical services and cultural<strong>de</strong>terminants of an emergency in Karachi, Pakistan. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):312-6.[138] Razzak JA, Kellermann AL. Emergency medical care in <strong>de</strong>veloping countries: is itworthwhile? Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(11):900-5.[139] Bhalla K, Ezzati M, Mahal A, Salomon J, Reich M. A risk-based method for mo<strong>de</strong>lingtraffic fatalities. Risk Anal. 2007 Feb;27(1):125-36.[140] Jarvis SN, Lowe PJ, Avery A, Levene S, Cormack RM. Children are not goldfish--mark/recapture techniques and their application to injury data. Inj Prev. 2000 Mar;6(1):46-50.[141] Dhillon PK, Lightstone AS, Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF. Assessment of hospital and policeascertainment of automobile versus childhood pe<strong>de</strong>strian and bicyclist collisions. Accid AnalPrev. 2001 Jul;33(4):529-37.[142] Khorasani-Zavareh D, Khankeh HR, Mohammadi R, Laflamme L, Bikmoradi A,Haglund BJ. Post-crash management of road traffic injury victims in Iran. Stakehol<strong>de</strong>rs' viewson current barriers and potential facilitators. BMC Emerg Med. 2009;9:8.[143] Retting RA, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT. A review of evi<strong>de</strong>nce-based trafficengineering measures <strong>de</strong>signed to reduce pe<strong>de</strong>strian-motor vehicle crashes. Am J PublicHealth. 2003 Sep;93(9):1456-63.[144] Retting RA, Kyrychenko SY, McCartt AT. Evaluation of automated spee<strong>de</strong>nforcement on Loop 101 freeway in Scottsdale, Arizona. Accid Anal Prev. 2008Jul;40(4):1506-12.[145] Nzegwu MA, Nzegwu CO. Review of causes of road traffic acci<strong>de</strong>nts in Benin City,Nigeria: a 1-year study, August 2003-July 2004. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Feb;19(1):77-8.[146] Ahmed A. National Road Safety Plan 2007-2012. Islamabad: National Road SafetySecretariat, Ministry of Communications; 2007.[147] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Summary reporton work zone crashes. Standing committee on highway traffic safety. Washington, DC:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; 1987.[148] Lewis-Evans B, Charlton SG. Explicit and implicit processes in behaviouraladaptation to road width. Accid Anal Prev. 2006 May;38(3):610-7.[149] Morgan JF, Duley AR, Hancock PA. Driver responses to differing urban work zoneconfigurations. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 May;42(3):978-85.[150] McKenna FP, Horswill MS, Alexan<strong>de</strong>r JL. Does anticipation training affect drivers'risk taking? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Mar;12(1):1-10.[151] Sagberg F, Bjornskau T. Hazard perception and driving experience among novicedrivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Mar;38(2):407-14.[152] Razzak JA, Laflamme L. Limitations of secondary data sets for road traffic injuryepi<strong>de</strong>miology: a study from Karachi, Pakistan. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jul-Sep;9(3):355-60.[153] Tachfouti N, Bhatti JA, Nejjari C, Kanjaa N, Salmi LR. Emergency trauma care forsevere injuries in a moroccan region: conformance to French and World Health Organizationstandards. J Healthc Qual. 2010 Jun 30:1-9.69
- Page 1:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5:
Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7:
Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9:
AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11:
AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13:
L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15:
2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17:
2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21: 2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23: ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25: ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29: Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 30 and 31: MethodsThe study setting was 196-km
- Page 32 and 33: patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35: Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 36 and 37: 5. Analytical StudiesPrevious liter
- Page 38 and 39: under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41: Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43: MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45: to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47: normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49: MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53: located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55: Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57: 6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59: Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61: observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63: to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65: [24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67: [69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 70 and 71: [154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73: 4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77: they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79: more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81: Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89: Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 90 and 91: BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the
- Page 92 and 93: patients were recorded during their
- Page 94 and 95: This might motivate police officers
- Page 96 and 97: 12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99: Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101: Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103: Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105: 104
- Page 106 and 107: 106
- Page 108 and 109: 108
- Page 110 and 111: Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113: 1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115: A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117: conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119:
21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123:
122
- Page 124 and 125:
ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127:
oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129:
SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 130 and 131:
Similarly, it was shown previously
- Page 132 and 133:
Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139:
Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 23. Situational factors assoc