This might motivate police officers to report RTIs, to better i<strong>de</strong>ntify the high-risk groups andcrash sites [13].Furthermore, police reported fewer pe<strong>de</strong>strian and motorcyclist involvement per hundredtraffic injuries. There could be several explanations: Firstly, it is likely that these injuries tookplace near built-up areas, so patients were transported by bystan<strong>de</strong>rs or ambulances directly tohospital, without police intervention [13, 32]. Secondly, it is possible that such road usersbelonged to lower socioeconomic status and did not want to be involved in cumbersome an<strong>de</strong>xpensive legal procedures, and settled their issues without police [19]. Nevertheless, effortsare required to improve documentation of such road users to better <strong>de</strong>sign and implementeffective crash prevention policies [33].Limitations of secondary datasets such as ambulance or ED for RTC prevention have beenconsi<strong>de</strong>red previously in Pakistan [34]. Availability of NISS was exceptional in this study,because of the existing RTI surveillance system [24]. It was observed that both EAS and EDrecor<strong>de</strong>d the approximate location of traffic crash (town, motel…), whereas police datainclu<strong>de</strong>d the km location of the sites. Linking of these datasets permitted to show a high crashand injury bur<strong>de</strong>n, but failed to i<strong>de</strong>ntify high-risk crash sites. Moreover, seat-belt and helmetuse was not reported in a majority of ED patients, and not recor<strong>de</strong>d at all in police data. Thisshows the need to improve police reporting of crash factors, information that could help in<strong>de</strong>veloping policies adapted to local settings [11].Finally, this study may have some limitation regarding RTI estimates because names were notavailable for one of three police and one of five ambulance records [34]. Some of these policeand ambulance records could be matched with only one common parameter, thus RTIs couldbe slightly overestimated in this study. Nevertheless, corrected fatality and injury rates werehigher than a similar road in an HIC [35]. Moreover, fatality numbers could be even higher,because patients were not followed for over 30 days, as in the WHO <strong>de</strong>finition [13].Furthermore, half of the police-reported patients were injured away from Karachi and weretransported to hospitals outsi<strong>de</strong> Karachi [32]. This shows that the ascertainment of policerecords could be much lower than reported in this study.In conclusion, interurban traffic crash bur<strong>de</strong>n appears to be several times higher in Pakistanthan other HICs [35]. Police RTI documentation, particularly of non-fatal injuries and thoseinvolving vulnerable road users, should be improved in Pakistan [12, 14, 34]. Revising policeperformance evaluation, to account for number of traffic crashes in which the policeintervened, might motivate officers to report RTIs [13, 36]. Furthermore, a linked andcomprehensive database would be useful to monitor and implement traffic safetyinterventions in Pakistan [14].ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe are especially thankful to Dr. Aftab Ahmed PATHAN, Deputy Inspector General ofPolice, Mr. Irshad SODHAR, Senior Patrolling Officer, and Mr. Naeemullah SHIEKH , SeniorPatrolling Officer, National Highway and Motorway Police south sector III office, Pakistanfor their support in data collection. We are also thankful to Pr. Rasheed JOOMA (JPMC) andMr. Ameer HUSSAIN (JPMC) for providing us the ED data. Special thanks to Mr. FaisalEDHI for providing us the EAS log books.ETHICAL APPROVAL94
All the police, ambulance, and ED data used in this study was publicly accessible and dataanalysis was conducted with approval from their respective institutions. Furthermore, thismanuscript does not permit i<strong>de</strong>ntification of any RTI patient.AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONThis study is the part of PhD thesis work of JB supervised by LRS who contributed equally tostudy conception, <strong>de</strong>sign, analysis, and manuscript writing. JAR and EL provi<strong>de</strong>d technicalhelp in all of the above work.COMPETING INTERESTSThe authors <strong>de</strong>clare that they have no competing interests.FUNDINGFirst author is the PhD candidate at Université Victor Segalen Bor<strong>de</strong>aux 2. This position isfun<strong>de</strong>d by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. Institut National <strong>de</strong> la Santé et <strong>de</strong> laRecherche Médicale Unité 897, France, fun<strong>de</strong>d the logistics for data collection. Fundingbodies had no input in study <strong>de</strong>sign, analysis and interpretation of results.REFERENCES1. Central Intelligence Agency: The World Factbook. Langley, VA: Directorate ofIntelligence; 2009.2. National Transport Research Centre: Manual of road safety improvement by theuse of low cost engineering countermeasures. Islamabad: National TransportResearch Centre, National Highway Authority, and Finnroad OY; 1999.3. Ghaffar A, Hy<strong>de</strong>r AA, Masud TI: The bur<strong>de</strong>n of road traffic injuries in <strong>de</strong>velopingcountries: the 1st national injury survey of Pakistan. Public health 2004,118(3):211-217.4. Fatmi Z, Had<strong>de</strong>n WC, Razzak JA, Qureshi HI, Hy<strong>de</strong>r AA, Pappas G: Inci<strong>de</strong>nce,patterns and severity of reported unintentional injuries in Pakistan for personsfive years and ol<strong>de</strong>r: results of the National Health Survey of Pakistan 1990-94.BMC public health 2007, 7:152.5. Ahmed A: Road Safety in Pakistan. Islamabad: National Road Safety Secreteriat;2007.6. Raja IA, Vohra AH, Ahmed M: Neurotrauma in Pakistan. World journal of surgery2001, 25(9):1230-1237.7. Government of Pakistan: Pakistan Transport Plan Study in the Islamic RepublicOf Pakistan. Islamabad: tripartite collaboration of the Japan InternationalCooperation Agency (JICA); National Transport Research Centre (NTRC), andMinistry of Communications, Government of Pakistan; 2007.8. National Transport Research Centre: Traffic Counter measures in Pakistan.Islamabad: National Transport Research Centre, Ministry of Communication; 1985.9. Shah SG, Khoumbati K, Soomro B: The pattern of <strong>de</strong>aths in road traffic crashes inSindh, Pakistan. International journal of injury control and safety promotion 2007,14(4):231-239.10. Oxley J, Corben B, Koppel S, Fil<strong>de</strong>s B, Jacques N, Symmons M, Johnston I: Costeffectiveinfrastructure measures on rural roads. Clayton, Victoria: MonashUniversity Acci<strong>de</strong>nt Research Centre; 2004.11. Wootton J, Jacobs GD: Safe roads: A dream or a reality. Crowthorne: TransportResearch Laboratory; 1996.95
- Page 1:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5:
Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7:
Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9:
AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11:
AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13:
L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15:
2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17:
2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19:
Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21:
2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23:
ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25:
ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29:
Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 30 and 31:
MethodsThe study setting was 196-km
- Page 32 and 33:
patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 36 and 37:
5. Analytical StudiesPrevious liter
- Page 38 and 39:
under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43:
MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45: to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47: normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49: MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53: located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55: Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57: 6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59: Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61: observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63: to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65: [24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67: [69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 68 and 69: [111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Va
- Page 70 and 71: [154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73: 4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77: they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79: more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81: Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89: Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 90 and 91: BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the
- Page 92 and 93: patients were recorded during their
- Page 96 and 97: 12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99: Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101: Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103: Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105: 104
- Page 106 and 107: 106
- Page 108 and 109: 108
- Page 110 and 111: Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113: 1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115: A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117: conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119: 21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121: Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123: 122
- Page 124 and 125: ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127: oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129: SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 130 and 131: Similarly, it was shown previously
- Page 132 and 133: Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135: Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137: Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139: Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141: Table 23. Situational factors assoc