BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the junction of Middle-East, South-East, and Central Asia , is the sixthmost populous nation of the world [1]. According to transport authorities, approximately 1.4million Road Traffic Crashes (RTCs) occurred in Pakistan in 1999, resulting in over 7 000fatalities [2]. Two in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt population-based surveys estimated inci<strong>de</strong>nce of Road TrafficInjuries (RTIs) around 15 to 17 per 1 000 persons per year [3, 4]. These injuries contributesignificantly to the workload in hospitals, leading to direct costs of over 1 billon US$ to thePakistani economy [5, 6].Interurban road sections are the backbone of Pakistani economy. Its strategic road network ofapproximately 8 000 km plays a significant role in transport, as it carries more than 80% ofinland passenger and freight traffic [2, 7]. Although these road sections account for 4% of theentire network, they account for a high proportion of traffic fatalities (27%) [8]. Previousresearch in Pakistan has shown that injury severity was higher for crashes in rural areas, butno distinction was ma<strong>de</strong> between interurban or other rural roads [9]. Higher speeds, presenceof vulnerable road users, and complex road traffic conditions can explain this high fatalityratio, but no comparison indicators were available for these road sections [10].Police records remain, to date, the most used source for evaluating interurban traffic safety,because of geographical distances and complexity of trauma care in such settings [9, 11]. Theuse of these statistics only, however, can lead to un<strong>de</strong>restimation of RTI bur<strong>de</strong>n in Low- andMiddle-Income Countries (LMICs) like Pakistan [12]. A recent World Health Organization(WHO) report showed that actual traffic fatalities could be 4 to 10 times higher than theofficial statistics in Pakistan [13]. A previous study in Karachi city showed that police recordsaccounted for only 56% of traffic fatalities and 4% of such severe injuries [14]. No notableresearch has been carried out to compare the differences in injury reporting by linkingdifferent datasets for interurban road settings in Pakistan [12, 13]. The World Bank reportedthat interventions with proven effectiveness exist but their implementations are impe<strong>de</strong>d bythe lack of documenting the specific disease bur<strong>de</strong>n in LMICs [15]. The objective of thisstudy were to assess differences in crash and injury reporting between police, ambulance, andEmergency Department (ED) datasets on an interurban road section in Pakistan. Further, thesedatasets were linked to assess variations in traffic fatality and injury per vehicle-kilometres(vehicle-km) travelled on the road section.METHODSThe study setting was the 196-km-long Karachi-Hala road section (km 16 to km 212 fromKarachi city centre). This is a four-lane highway, two lanes in each direction [16]. The lanesare separated by a ground surface, but there are no physical barriers. Traffic counts range16 356 to 24 707 vehicles per day on this section [17]. This high traffic count can beexplained by the economic activity in Karachi, the most populous city of Pakistan, whichaccounts for 70% of the government’s revenue through tra<strong>de</strong> and industry [18]. In thisretrospective study, information on traffic injuries reported to highway police, ambulanceservice, and ED during 2008 (Jan to Dec) was collected and compared.Police dataSince 2004, the National Highway & Motorway Police (NHMP) ensures traffic enforcementon this road section. Administratively, this section is consi<strong>de</strong>red as Sector I of South-Zone ofNHMP and is divi<strong>de</strong>d further in four 46- to 51-km-long beats: beat 35 (km 16 to 62), beat 3490
(63 to 114), beat 33 (115 to 162 km), and beat 32 (163 to 212 km). NHMP <strong>de</strong>ploys four motorvehicles and four patrolling officers in an eight-hour shift on these beats [19].For every crash, a standard acci<strong>de</strong>nt analysis report is filed by the attending NHMP officerduring the first 24 hours [20]. A copy of this report is kept in the NHMP regional office.Similarly, <strong>de</strong>tails on crash and those involved are recor<strong>de</strong>d on a separate acci<strong>de</strong>nt register.From these reports and registers, information was extracted on time, date, location of crash,and whether it was fatal, involved injury, or was without injury. We also extractedinformation on name, age, sex, outcome (<strong>de</strong>ad; severe injury, <strong>de</strong>fined as transported tohospital; and mild injury, <strong>de</strong>fined as not transported to hospital), and hospital brought to ofthose involved in crashes.Ambulance dataAmbulance records were obtained from Edhi Ambulance Service (EAS) logbooks. EAS is thelargest private philanthropic ambulance service in the world [21]. Since 1973, the EAS hasbeen progressively increasing its ambulance posts from main Pakistani cities to the importanthighways in Pakistan [22, 23]. For transporting injured patients, EAS has established sixambulance posts, mostly near main towns on Karachi-Hala road section: 1/ Sohrab Goth (12km from Karachi centre), 2/ Karachi toll plaza (km 28), 3/ Edhi centre (km 56), 4/ Nooriabad(km 94), 5/ Hala Naka (km 160), and 6/ Hala city (km 212). This service is freely available toinjury patients, and funds are raised by transporting other patients. Ambulance staff consistsof, in most of cases, only the driver. A clerk at the post can accompany the driver if he thinksthis justified, for instance in case of crash with multiple patients. Ambulance communicateswith emergency post through a wireless system or by cell phone.RTI patients or bystan<strong>de</strong>rs can contact EAS using the free emergency access number 115,which connects them to the main city centre [21]. Information is then transmitted by wirelessor cell phone to nearby posts, which finally dispatches the ambulance(s). After reaching thescene, injured and <strong>de</strong>ad patients are separated. Those severely injured are transported to thenearest hospital; preference is given to the government hospital if available. All informationon the RTI intervention, including crash location, RTI patient i<strong>de</strong>ntity and outcome, is thentransmitted by wireless or telephone to the regional centre, which records the information in acentral log book. We photocopied these log books from the regional centre at Karachi. Crash<strong>de</strong>tails such as date, time, location, and whether it was fatal or involved injury were extractedfrom these books. Similarly, road user <strong>de</strong>tails such as name, sex, age, user type (pe<strong>de</strong>strian,motorcycle ri<strong>de</strong>r, or vehicle occupant), and outcome (died, including when the person died atcrash scene, during transport, or at ED; injured and transported, including hospital taken to;injured and not transported) were extracted from these books [21].Hospital recordsThe Road Traffic Injury Research & Prevention Centre (RTIRP) at the Jinnah Post GraduateMedical Centre (JPMC) has been working since September 2006 [24]. This centresystematically collects, on standard Proforma sheets, information on RTI patients presentingat the ED of the five largest teaching hospitals in Karachi: 1/ JPMC, 2/ Abbasi ShaheedHospital, 3/ Civil Hospital Karachi, 4/ Liaqat National Hospital, and 5/ The Aga KhanUniversity Hospital. Details on their data collection methods are available elsewhere [24, 25].This dataset inclu<strong>de</strong>s information on the crash date, time, and location as well as patient’sname, age, sex, road user type (pe<strong>de</strong>strian, motorcycle ri<strong>de</strong>r, or vehicle occupant). Furtherinformation on whether the patient was wearing a helmet or seat belt was available. The NewInjury Severity Scores (NISS) [26] and outcome (discharged, admitted/referred, or died) of91
- Page 1:
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5:
Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7:
Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9:
AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11:
AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13:
L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15:
2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17:
2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19:
Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21:
2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23:
ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25:
ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27:
Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29:
Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 30 and 31:
MethodsThe study setting was 196-km
- Page 32 and 33:
patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 36 and 37:
5. Analytical StudiesPrevious liter
- Page 38 and 39:
under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41: Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43: MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45: to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47: normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49: MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53: located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55: Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57: 6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59: Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61: observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63: to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65: [24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67: [69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 68 and 69: [111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Va
- Page 70 and 71: [154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73: 4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77: they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79: more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81: Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87: Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89: Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 92 and 93: patients were recorded during their
- Page 94 and 95: This might motivate police officers
- Page 96 and 97: 12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99: Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101: Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103: Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105: 104
- Page 106 and 107: 106
- Page 108 and 109: 108
- Page 110 and 111: Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113: 1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115: A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117: conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119: 21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121: Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123: 122
- Page 124 and 125: ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127: oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129: SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 130 and 131: Similarly, it was shown previously
- Page 132 and 133: Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135: Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137: Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139: Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 23. Situational factors assoc