5. Analytical StudiesPrevious literature from LMICs, and results from the Cameroon study consistently showed alower contribution of situational factors in crashes than those reported in studies from HICs[49]. Nevertheless, we observed that some situational factors were frequently observed atcrash sites. We thought it interesting to assess situational factors associated with injury crashsites on Yaoundé-Douala road section by case-control study, a method never used previouslyto assess such contributions (Study III). Similarly, a high crash fatality associated with roadsection un<strong>de</strong>rgoing maintenance, ma<strong>de</strong> interesting for us to assess such bur<strong>de</strong>n and compare itwith that of normal traffic using historical cohort study methods (Study IV). Both of theabove studies showed that crash circumstances could be better explained when driver- andsituation-related factors are consi<strong>de</strong>red simultaneously. This suggested us to <strong>de</strong>velop and testa novel method to assess interactions between hazard perception and situational factors athigh-risk crash sites in voluntary Pakistani drivers (Study V).5.1 Study III: Situational factors at traffic crash sites: a case-control studyon Yaoundé-Douala road section, CameroonSituational factors play an important role in <strong>de</strong>termining risk and severity of an RTC [60].Improving road <strong>de</strong>sign for instance, can <strong>de</strong>crease crash risk by increasing road network abilityto compensate for driving errors [62]. Similarly, installation of si<strong>de</strong> impact barriers at curvesor removal of solid objects reduces crash severity. It is estimated from crash data of HICs thatimplementing road interventions can reduce 20% of the preventable RTCs [49].Installation of road interventions in LMICs is often not effectively advocated, due toun<strong>de</strong>rreporting of involved situational factors at crash sites [50]. As discussed earlier, policereports are the most common RTC surveillance mechanism in LMICs, but they tend to focusonly on road user-related crash factors (Figure 5, page 19). In countries like Botswana, India,and Zimbabwe, road factors were reported in only one percent of crashes [7]. Our results fromCameroon showed that road situational factors were i<strong>de</strong>ntified in less than 5% of interurbanroad crashes. A similar proportion was observed for interurban crashes in Pakistan [89].These proportions were certainly less than the expected involvement of such factors incrashes as shown in the USA and Great Britain [55].Moreover, previous traffic safety research in LMICs focused more on transient factors such ascrash time or adverse weather conditions [90]. It was observed that, when situational factorswere reported as a crash cause, adverse weather or reduced visibility were i<strong>de</strong>ntified in overhalf of these crashes [89]. In LMICs, police are not trained to report road factors, informationessential to advocate and implement local as well as area-wi<strong>de</strong> road interventions [7, 91]. Wefound only one cross-sectional study from Brazil, showing that road surface conditions weresignificantly associated with injury crashes on interurban roads [21]. Involvement andcontribution of modifiable situational factors other than weather conditions is rarelyinvestigated in LMICs, particularly using case-control methods [90, 92].36
ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were:1. To assess situational factors associated with injury crashes sites on an interurban roadsection in Cameroon.2. To assess attributable risk proportion for such crash factors.This study has been published as: Bhatti JA, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Lagar<strong>de</strong> E, Salmi LR.Situational factors associated with road traffic crashes: A case-control study on the Yaoun<strong>de</strong>-Douala road section, Cameroon. International Journal of Injury Control and SafetyPromotion 2010 Mar 30:1-8 (Appendix 5).I contributed principally in data collection from vi<strong>de</strong>os, analysis, interpretation of results, andmanuscript writing.MethodsDesign and settingThis case-control study was conducted on the Yaoundé-Douala road section. This 243-km,undivi<strong>de</strong>d, mostly two-lane road connects the two most populated cities (over one millioninhabitants each); Yaoundé at 750 m above sea level and Douala, the port city. This roadsection passes through several smaller towns (
- Page 1: Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux
- Page 4 and 5: Publications (peer-reviewed).......
- Page 6 and 7: Index of figuresFigure 1. Traffic f
- Page 8 and 9: AbbreviationsAKUAVCIBMIEASESSDALYDW
- Page 10 and 11: AbstractBackground: Interurban traf
- Page 12 and 13: L'objectif de cette thèse était d
- Page 14 and 15: 2. Background2.1 Road injury burden
- Page 16 and 17: 2.4 Multiple factors involved in tr
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 4. Percentage difference of
- Page 20 and 21: 2.7 Interurban road safety research
- Page 22 and 23: ObjectivesThe objectives of this fi
- Page 24 and 25: ResultsCrash burdenA total of 935 R
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 7. Monthly trend of traffic
- Page 28 and 29: Injury outcome patternsMost of inju
- Page 30 and 31: MethodsThe study setting was 196-km
- Page 32 and 33: patients. In the ED, those with NIS
- Page 34 and 35: Table 6. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 38 and 39: under supervision of Dr. Sobngwi-Ta
- Page 40 and 41: Table 9. Situational variables at c
- Page 42 and 43: MethodsStudy design and settingStud
- Page 44 and 45: to Dec 08 were retrieved and photoc
- Page 46 and 47: normal zones. However, this associa
- Page 48 and 49: MethodsStudy design and settingsThe
- Page 50 and 51: Figure 14. Picture extracted of a h
- Page 52 and 53: located in built-up area in Pakista
- Page 54 and 55: Table 15. Differences in hazard per
- Page 56 and 57: 6. Discussion6.1 Originality of stu
- Page 58 and 59: Although adjustments are possible,
- Page 60 and 61: observational studies on how the de
- Page 62 and 63: to understand the deficiencies in t
- Page 64 and 65: [24] Damsere-Derry J, Afukaar FK, D
- Page 66 and 67: [69] Central Intelligence Agency. T
- Page 68 and 69: [111] Geurts K, Wets G, Brijs T, Va
- Page 70 and 71: [154] Rosenbloom T, Shahar A, Elhar
- Page 72 and 73: 4. Farooq U, Bhatti JA, Siddiq M, M
- Page 74 and 75: Appendix 1: Literature review on in
- Page 76 and 77: they identified a cluster of long b
- Page 78 and 79: more cost-effective than redesignin
- Page 80 and 81: Table 18. Traffic injury interventi
- Page 86 and 87:
Appendix 3: Study I supplementary r
- Page 88 and 89:
Appendix 4: Manuscript in preparati
- Page 90 and 91:
BACKGROUNDPakistan, located at the
- Page 92 and 93:
patients were recorded during their
- Page 94 and 95:
This might motivate police officers
- Page 96 and 97:
12. Peden M, Scurfiled R, Sleet D,
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 1. Traffic injuries reported
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 3. Ascertainment of police, a
- Page 102 and 103:
Appendix 5: Article published - Stu
- Page 104 and 105:
104
- Page 106 and 107:
106
- Page 108 and 109:
108
- Page 110 and 111:
Appendix 6: Article under review -
- Page 112 and 113:
1. INTRODUCTIONWith the aging of hi
- Page 114 and 115:
A total of 180 crashes were identif
- Page 116 and 117:
conspicuity at HWZs in Pakistan. 2
- Page 118 and 119:
21. Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Bhatti J, K
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 2. Highway work zone crash fa
- Page 122 and 123:
122
- Page 124 and 125:
ABSTRACTObjectives: Interurban road
- Page 126 and 127:
oad). A matched strategy was used t
- Page 128 and 129:
SitesOut of 131 crash sites identif
- Page 130 and 131:
Similarly, it was shown previously
- Page 132 and 133:
Majdzadeh, R., Khalagi, K., Naraghi
- Page 134 and 135:
Table 2. Characteristics of Pakista
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 4. Factors associated with ha
- Page 138 and 139:
Table 21. Situational factors at hi
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 23. Situational factors assoc