The Islamic University- Gaza Deanery of Higher Education Faculty of ...

AverageTheRatioWeight%Rankp-value(Sig.)Table (4.3) below shows the mean, the ratio weight, sign value and ranking of each item in thefirst domain.Table (4.3)Arithmetic average and the Probability of Value (Sig.) for each Item in Domain (1)Items1.Domain (1) “Training Programme Goals."determined in the light of a valid and acomprehensive needs analysis2.97 59.57 4 0.8262.clearly stated at the beginning of theprinted training materials3331 66.09 1 0.0523.applicable ( can be applied in classroomrealities )3313 62.61 3 0.5254.focused on students' achievement problemsinside the classrooms2384 56.96 7 0.2915.focused on problematic areas in theEnglish curriculum2371 54.35 8 0.0626.planned collaboratively with theparticipation of trainees2347 49.57 9 0.0047.derived in the light of the general goals ofEnglish language teaching3.21 64.35 2 0.3068. derived in the light of schools needs 2.86 57.39 6 0.3649.derived in the light of a general coherentplan2.89 57.83 5 0.335Total2.9748 59.500.866Table (4.3) above shows that the mean of “Training Programme Goals” domain equals 2.9748,the weighted value that equals (59.50%), and P-value = 0.866 which is greater than the levelof significance 0.05. This means that the first domain is statistically insignificant and theaverage degree of responses to this domain does not differ from the degree of neutrality3.In addition, Table (4.3) shows that:1. The highest ranking item is number 2 (clearly stated at the beginning of the printedtraining materials) which has the first rank with a weighted value that equals 66.09%,2. The second highest item was number 7(derived in the light of the general goals ofEnglish language teaching) with a ratio weight of 64.35% followed by, item number 3- 118 -