Strucchelli, A. (2009). Inquiry in the Classroom : Peer Observation as a Form <strong>of</strong> Job-Embedded Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Learning.(Unpublished master‟s thesis, Queens university. Canada).Retreived December 14,2009, from http://hdl.handle.net/1974/5091Sultana, N. (2004). Needs Assessment and Designing a Model for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development <strong>of</strong>College Teachers in Pakistan. (Unpublished dictoral dissertation, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> AridAgriculture). Retreived February 11,2009, from dlibrary.acu edu.au/digitaltheses./public/adt.../index.htmlSupovitz,J.& Turner,H.(2000).<strong>The</strong> Effects <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development on Science TeachingPractices and Classroom Culture. Journal <strong>of</strong> research in Science Teaching. 37(9) 963-980.Consortium for Policy Research in <strong>Education</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania. Retrieved 27July,2010, from citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1.4669...Supovtiz, .J. Mayer, D., &Kahle,J. (2000). Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice:<strong>The</strong>Longtidunal Impact <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in the Context <strong>of</strong> Systematic Reforms <strong>of</strong>.<strong>Education</strong>al Policy , 14 (3), 331-356. Retreived July 16,2010, from http:// epx sagepub.com/.content/14/3/331.Turner, C. (1999). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> In- Service Teacher Training Project Across Costa Rica. CostaRica: US Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. Retreived June 28,2009,from http://eric.ed. gov/ERICWebPortal/sUlker, A. & Tas, A. (2009). Class Teachers' Conceptions about In-Service Training (<strong>The</strong> case<strong>of</strong> Turkey ). American Eurasian Journal <strong>of</strong> Scientific Research Journal, 4(4), 270-280.Retrieved October 15,2009, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/sU.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (1997). Achieving the goals: Goal 4. Teacher <strong>Education</strong> andPr<strong>of</strong>essional Development. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 5, 2009, fromwww.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED412207US Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, National Center for <strong>Education</strong> Statistics (1999) Teacher Quality.A Report on the Preparation and Qualifications <strong>of</strong> Public School Teachers (NCES 1999-080).Washington DC. Retrieved August 22, 2009, from nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999080.pdfU.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (2001). Teacher Preparation and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development:2000 (National Center for <strong>Education</strong> Statistics Report No. 2001-088). Washington, DC: Author.U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>(2001). Building Bridges: <strong>The</strong> Mission and Principles <strong>of</strong>Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development. Goals 200,0 Retrieved. October 29, 2009, fromwww.ed.gov/G2K/bridge.htmlU.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (2002). Scientifically based research and the ComprehensiveSchool Reform (CSR) Program. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 5, 2009 from,www.ed.gov/G2K/bridge.htmlWang,J. & Gu, L.,(2006). School-Based Research and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Learning: An InnovativeModel to Promote Teacher Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in China. Teaching <strong>Education</strong>. 17(1), 59–73. Retrieved July, 19, 2010, from http://www. informaworld.com/://dx.doi.org/104762105005Weir, C. & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.- 197 -
Whitney,A.,Sheridan D. B.,& Rosemary H. C.(2005) Evaluating IIMPaC: Teacher and StudentOutcomes Through a Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Program in the Teaching <strong>of</strong> Writing. SouthCoast Writing Project <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved January, 4, 2010,from, www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/.../LSRI_SCWriP_Cohort_II.pdf?x-Wong, Jocelyn L. N. & Tsui, Amy B. M.(2007). How do Teachers View the Effects <strong>of</strong> School-Based Inservice Learning Activities? A Case Study in China, Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> forTeaching,33(4)457-470.:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607470701603290Ye-He, P. & Teneka, S. (2009). Moving Beyond 'just good teaching': ESL Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment for All Teachers', Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in <strong>Education</strong>, First published on: 21December 2009 (iFirst)1-12). ://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415250903467199Yigit, N. (2008). A Study on the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> an In-Service( INSET) Course about the Use<strong>of</strong> Instructional Technologies and Material Development. World Applied Sciences, 4 (1), 69-75.Retrieved August 17, 2009 from, www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj4(s1)/12.pdfYoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the Evidence on HowTeacher Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Affects Student Achievement (Issues & Answers Report,REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>, Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>Sciences, National Center for <strong>Education</strong> Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional<strong>Education</strong>al Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabsYun, L., Rong-feng, H., Yu, D., (2010). Teachers‟ Training and Development in SichuanProvince, PRC: <strong>The</strong> Status Quo and Existing Problems. Canadian Social Science. 6(1), 17-24.Retrieved May, 2, 2010, from www.cscanada.neYussef,A.(1973).Training and Preparation <strong>of</strong> the Arab Teachers Conference. Arab League<strong>Education</strong>al Scientific Cultural Organization.Doc.B4.Cario-324Yussef,A.(1975).New Concepts in INSET. INSET sessions in El- Manama, Bahrain.Zhu, H. (2010). Curriculum Reform and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development: a Case Study on ChineseTeacher Educators. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in <strong>Education</strong>, 36(1), 373 -391.://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415250903457604Zhu, H. (2010). Curriculum Reform and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development: a Case Study on ChineseTeacher Educators. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in <strong>Education</strong>, 36(1), 373 -391.://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415250903457604- 198 -
- Page 1 and 2:
The Islamic University- GazaDeanery
- Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTIn the Name of Allah,
- Page 6 and 7:
Evaluating the Inservice Training P
- Page 8 and 9:
2.2.3 Systematic and Intentional Pr
- Page 10 and 11:
5.8 Final Conclusions 1765.9 Recomm
- Page 12 and 13:
List of Figures Used in the StudyNo
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter IStudy Statement and Backgr
- Page 16 and 17:
The Quranic celebration of knowledg
- Page 18 and 19:
that, “Continuous high quality pr
- Page 20 and 21:
study attempts to explore the reali
- Page 22 and 23:
2. It presents a set of comprehensi
- Page 24 and 25:
EvaluationEvaluation can be defined
- Page 26 and 27:
Chapter IIReview of Related Literat
- Page 28 and 29:
Chapter IILiterature ReviewIntroduc
- Page 30 and 31:
the umbrella of this trend (Abed Ha
- Page 32 and 33:
2009; Fraser et al., 2007, Remeirs
- Page 34 and 35:
3. The rapid technological, economi
- Page 36 and 37:
1. Informing teachers about changes
- Page 38 and 39:
2. Changes in students‟ learning
- Page 40 and 41:
(good) condition of a people as lon
- Page 42 and 43:
In brief, the success of INSET prog
- Page 44 and 45:
1. Training with the traditional no
- Page 46 and 47:
2.6.2 Innovative modelsThe innovati
- Page 48 and 49:
2. Some participants in the group m
- Page 50 and 51:
According to Lakshami (2009, p.14)
- Page 52 and 53:
These six major components of the I
- Page 54 and 55:
To conclude, overcoming all previou
- Page 56 and 57:
2. Participant learning, which meas
- Page 58 and 59:
Table (2.1)Guskey’s Evaluative Mo
- Page 60:
2.8 Contemporary Principles of High
- Page 63 and 64:
• Planning INSET content in the l
- Page 65:
1. Survey questionnaires.2. Open-en
- Page 68 and 69:
Section IIAn Overview of Related Pr
- Page 70 and 71:
In addition, the studies purposes,
- Page 72 and 73:
constraints, and lack of practical
- Page 74 and 75:
importantly conducting more detaile
- Page 76 and 77:
showed positive participants satisf
- Page 78 and 79:
A further relevant study was perfor
- Page 80 and 81:
school principals and teachers is n
- Page 82 and 83:
teachers' attitudes, beliefs and pr
- Page 84 and 85:
lack of openness to change, lack of
- Page 86 and 87:
Following the same track of evaluat
- Page 88 and 89:
levels of achievements. Thus, a rec
- Page 90 and 91:
Under the same umbrella, Podhajski
- Page 92 and 93:
101 students in the control group.
- Page 94 and 95:
utilizing collaboration, taking adv
- Page 96 and 97:
IntroductionChapter IIIMethodology3
- Page 98 and 99:
Table: (3.1)Distribution According
- Page 100 and 101:
eferred to either as trends, standa
- Page 102 and 103:
3. Researchers ListsThis category i
- Page 104 and 105:
2. Most of the surveyed countries h
- Page 106 and 107:
5. The third draft was distributed
- Page 108 and 109:
Table (3.5)The Final Construction o
- Page 110 and 111:
14 0.63915 0.80715 0.52717 0.51518
- Page 112 and 113:
of this domain are significant at
- Page 114 and 115:
Table (3.13)Cronbach's Alpha Correl
- Page 116 and 117:
3. Information can be obtained more
- Page 118 and 119:
5. Getting the permission from UNRW
- Page 120 and 121:
Chapter IVThe Study FindingsIntrodu
- Page 122 and 123:
established in December 1964 as a j
- Page 124 and 125:
2. Training TechniquesThe main trai
- Page 126 and 127:
2. To provide English teachers with
- Page 128 and 129:
4.2 The Answer of the Second Questi
- Page 130 and 131:
4. Training Programme Content (62.1
- Page 132 and 133:
(applicable - can be applied in cla
- Page 134 and 135:
The previous Table (4.5) clarifies
- Page 136 and 137:
Table (4. 7) also shows that:• Th
- Page 138 and 139:
10 (are applied systematically (at
- Page 140 and 141:
In addition, Table (4.11) shows tha
- Page 142 and 143:
In addition, Table (4.13) shows tha
- Page 144 and 145:
Table (4.20) below shows the freque
- Page 146 and 147:
NoKruskal -Wallis teststatisticP-va
- Page 148 and 149:
DomainKruskal -Wallis teststatistic
- Page 150 and 151:
Table (4.21)Frequencies and the per
- Page 152 and 153:
8. Traditional but good and needed
- Page 154 and 155:
4.5.5 Question (5): “What comment
- Page 156 and 157:
4.6 The Answer of the Sixth Questio
- Page 158 and 159:
Chapter VDiscussion, Conclusions, a
- Page 160 and 161: Acknowledging such limitations, EDC
- Page 162 and 163: proved in the questionnaire results
- Page 164 and 165: (68.26%) and item number 9 (develop
- Page 166 and 167: • Lack of overall policies and co
- Page 168 and 169: 4. Lack of practicality, in the sen
- Page 170 and 171: 4. Inadequate follow up of the prog
- Page 172 and 173: than the other districts. This resu
- Page 174 and 175: give us more stimulation and it wil
- Page 176 and 177: 5.6.2 DifferencesIn contrast to the
- Page 178 and 179: training facilities. The Suggested
- Page 180 and 181: particular issues as proved within
- Page 182 and 183: 6. Trainers’ selectionRashed (200
- Page 184 and 185: • Recent: using recent tools as p
- Page 186 and 187: Figure (5.1): the Suggested Evaluat
- Page 188 and 189: The Future Suggested INSETProgramme
- Page 190 and 191: 9. Lack of focus on the linguistic
- Page 192 and 193: 3. Establishing planning and evalua
- Page 194 and 195: Recommendations for Educationalists
- Page 196 and 197: ReferencesThe Holy Qur‟an.Abdal-H
- Page 198 and 199: Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Trudy,
- Page 200 and 201: Darling-Hammond, L.,Wei,R., Andree,
- Page 202 and 203: Guskey. ( 1997) Research Needs to L
- Page 204 and 205: Ji -Kim, S. (2008). An Examination
- Page 206 and 207: Marek, E. A., & Methven, S. B. (199
- Page 208 and 209: Porter, A., Garet,M., Desimore L, B
- Page 212 and 213: Appendices199
- Page 214 and 215: Appendix (2) Studies ListNO The Stu
- Page 216 and 217: NO ThecountryAppendix (4) Countries
- Page 218 and 219: Appendix (5) The Final List of the
- Page 220 and 221: Appendix (6) the First Draft of the
- Page 222 and 223: Appendix(7) The second Draft of the
- Page 224 and 225: Training Programme Evaluation Tools
- Page 226 and 227: Appendix (8) The Third Draft of the
- Page 228 and 229: Peer ObservationIn its simplest mea
- Page 230 and 231: Appendix (9) The Final Questionnair
- Page 232 and 233: Peer ObservationIn its simplest mea
- Page 234 and 235: Appendix (10) Interview Consultatio
- Page 236 and 237: Line Transcript Text Open codeInter
- Page 238 and 239: Line Transcript text Open codeParti
- Page 240 and 241: contemporary techniques and methods
- Page 242 and 243: ..you may say the allowed…the ava
- Page 244 and 245: Participant 1 : we dream of a day t
- Page 246 and 247: Appendix (12) Questionnaire Consult
- Page 248 and 249: Appendix (14) Permission (1)235
- Page 250 and 251: Appendix (16) Focused Group Intervi
- Page 252 and 253: 3..73..7/6/21-6/35/6/33-6/18The Tra
- Page 254 and 255: Content of Training Course Programm
- Page 256 and 257: NoNo NeedLow NeedModerateNeedHighNe
- Page 258 and 259: Part V: INSET programme Evaluation
- Page 260 and 261:
Appendix (21) Suggested Useful Webs
- Page 262:
بسن اهلل الرحوي الر