The Islamic University- Gaza Deanery of Higher Education Faculty of ...

Table (4. 7) also shows that:• The highest items are number 3 (depend on lecturing and theoretical presentations)which had the first rank with a ratio weight of 73.48% , secondly, item number 2(aredirectly based on programme content) with a weighted value that equals 69.13% andthirdly, item number 1(are directly related to programme goals) with a ratio weight of68.70%• The lowest rank item is number 7(employ innovative techniques such as onlinetraining) with a weighted value that equals 44.78% and item number 5(Employindividually guided techniques such as portfolios and journal writing with a ratiovalue of 53.91%• Items number 4, 6, 8, 9 are ranked by trainees as moderate with weighted value asshown table (4.7) arranged in a descending order.4.3.4 Domain (4) “Training programme Evaluation Tools”Table (4. 8)Responses to Domain (4) Items (1-10)ResponsesPercentage%To a very small extentTo a small extentTo a moderate extentTo a large extentTo a very large extent2.1723.9134.7836.962.17Table (4.8) above shows that 39.13% of the trainees‟ responses are in accordance with thestated items in the fourth domain while 26.08% are not. Such percentages reflect moderatetrainees‟ satisfaction.Table (4. 9) next page shows the mean, the ratio weight, sign value and ranking of each itemof the fourth domain “Training Programme Evaluation Tools”- 123 -