References<strong>The</strong> Holy Qur‟an.Abdal-Haqq, I. (1996). Making Time for Teacher Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development. Retrieved August17, 2006, from, Eric Digist: http://www.ericdigests.org/1997-2/time.htmAbed-Halim, S. (2008). <strong>The</strong> Effect <strong>of</strong> Using Some Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Strategies onImproving the Teaching Performance <strong>of</strong> English Language Student Teacher at the <strong>Faculty</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Education</strong>, Helwan <strong>University</strong> in the light <strong>of</strong> Pre- Service Teacher Standards. (Unpublisheddoctoral dissertation, Helwan <strong>University</strong>, Egypt). Retrieved December, 4, 2010 fromeric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED507049Abu- Atwan, M. (2008). Barriers <strong>of</strong> In-Service Teachers Training in <strong>Gaza</strong> Governorates.(Unpublished master‟s thesis). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gaza</strong>, <strong>Gaza</strong>.Abu-Jado, M. (2008). Institute <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>: Establishment, Development, Philosophy andINSET Programmes. UNRWA .Jordan, Amman.Abu-Salem, H. (2008). Evaluating Inservice Training Programmes for Physical. <strong>Education</strong>Teachers According to Its specified Goals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Al-Aqsa<strong>University</strong>, <strong>Gaza</strong>.Al-Ahmed, Kh. (2005). Teachers from Preparation to Training. UEA: Dar-Al-ketab Al-Jameai.Al-Ajez, F. (2004). Evaluating In-service Training Workshops for Secondary Schools in <strong>Gaza</strong>Governorates from Teachers and Supervisors Perceptions. Research Paper presented atSixteenth Scientific Conference at Curriculum and Methodology Egyptian Association.Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.iugaza.edu.ps/ara/research/articles.pdfAl-Ansari, I. (1995). Inservice <strong>Education</strong> and Training <strong>of</strong> EFL Teachers in Saudi Arabia : AStudy <strong>of</strong> Current Provision and Future Needs.(Unpublished master‟s thesis, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong>Southampton,UK).Retreived December 5,2010,from http:// proquest. umi. com. ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/Al- Farraa, F. (1996). Evaluating Basic Stage Inservice Training in <strong>Gaza</strong> Strip and Ways <strong>of</strong>Development. Al- AzharJournal (Humanitarian Science). 1(1) December, 121-131.Al-Khateeb,A. & Al-Khateeb, R.(1986). New Trends in Training. Riyad: Al-Farasdeq.Al-Khateeb, A. (1987). INSET Framework for Secondary Teachers in Egypt and <strong>Gaza</strong> Strip.(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Al- Mansoura <strong>University</strong>, Egypt.Al-Khateeb,A. & El- Aila,R.(1998). Designing and Planning INSET Programmes in Palestine.Palestinian Educaional Researches and Studies Journal.1(2),99-137.Al–Mutawa, N. (1997). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Student-Teachers‟ Performance in TEFL Practicum inKuwait <strong>University</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> Arab Universities Union, Jordan, Amman, 1(144), 42-69.- 183 -
Al-Muteeri,A., Al-Mufreg,B., & Hamada,M.,(2007). Contemporary Trends in Teachers’Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development. <strong>Education</strong>al Renewal Unit. Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong>. Kuwait.Retrieved July, 1, 2010 from http://www.shebacss.com/docs/soasr001-10.pdfAl-Qreanawi, M. (2009). Evaluating the Inservice Training Programme for Math UNRWATeachers in the Light <strong>of</strong> Quality Standards. (Unpublished master‟s thesis). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Islamic</strong><strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gaza</strong>, <strong>Gaza</strong>.Al-Shandawily, H. (1990). Evaluating the "Welcome to English” Training Programme Held atthe Main In-service training Centre at Manshiat El- Bakreey for Prep Stage Inspectors andSenior Teachers <strong>of</strong> English. (Unpublished master‟s thesis). Ain Shams <strong>University</strong>, Egypt.Alwan, F. (2000). Towards Effective In-Service Teacher Development in the United Arab <strong>of</strong>Emirates: Getting Teachers to be in Charge <strong>of</strong> their own Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Growth. (Unpublishedmaster‟s thesis, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bath.UAE). Retrieved December 9,2009, fromwww.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail.American Federation <strong>of</strong> Teachers. (2002). Principles for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development: AFTS’guidelines for pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development Programmes that Make a Difference. RetrievedDecember16, 2009 from, www.aft.org/pdfs/teachers/principlesprodev0502.pdfArab League <strong>Education</strong>al Scientific Cultural Organization.(1972). Training and Preparation<strong>of</strong> the Arab Teachers Conference. Cairo : Al-Takadum.Atay, D. (2004). Collaborative Dialoques with Student Teachers as a Follow-up to Teachers Insevice<strong>Education</strong> and Training. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 143-162.Retreiverd October12, 2009, from http://ltr.sagepub.com/Atay, D. (2008). Teachers Research for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development. ELT Journal. 62(2), 139-147.Retreived January 24, 2009, from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.orgBarzaq, M. (2007). Student-Teachers' Training Programmes Evaluation in English LanguageTeaching Colleges <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> in <strong>Gaza</strong> Strip Universities. (Unpublished master‟s thesis).<strong>Islamic</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gaza</strong>, <strong>Gaza</strong>.Bayrakci, M. (2009). In-Service Teacher Training in Japan and Turkey: AComparative Analysis<strong>of</strong> Instituions and Practices. Australian Journal <strong>of</strong> Teacher <strong>Education</strong>. 34 (1), 10-22.RetreiverdFebruary5,2010, from ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/issues/PDF/341/Bayracki.pdfBiggs, A. Crawford, L., & Schmeister, M. (2008). Impact <strong>of</strong> Intensive Pr<strong>of</strong>essionalDevelopment on Teachers' Use <strong>of</strong> Sheltered Instruction with Students Who are EnglishLanguage Learners. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Development in <strong>Education</strong>, 34(3), 327– 342.doi.org/10.1080/13674580801950816Bohi,F. & Bauimi, M.(2002). Studies in Teachers Preparation. Cairo: Dar –Al-Maerifaa Al-Jameia.Bolam, R., Clark, J., Jones, K., Harper-Jones G., Timbrell, T., Jones, R. & Thorpe, R. (1995).<strong>The</strong> Induction <strong>of</strong> Newly Qualified Teachers in Schools: Where next? Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Developmentin <strong>Education</strong>, 21:3,247-260.doi.org/10.1080/0305763950210302- 184 -
- Page 1 and 2:
The Islamic University- GazaDeanery
- Page 4 and 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTIn the Name of Allah,
- Page 6 and 7:
Evaluating the Inservice Training P
- Page 8 and 9:
2.2.3 Systematic and Intentional Pr
- Page 10 and 11:
5.8 Final Conclusions 1765.9 Recomm
- Page 12 and 13:
List of Figures Used in the StudyNo
- Page 14 and 15:
Chapter IStudy Statement and Backgr
- Page 16 and 17:
The Quranic celebration of knowledg
- Page 18 and 19:
that, “Continuous high quality pr
- Page 20 and 21:
study attempts to explore the reali
- Page 22 and 23:
2. It presents a set of comprehensi
- Page 24 and 25:
EvaluationEvaluation can be defined
- Page 26 and 27:
Chapter IIReview of Related Literat
- Page 28 and 29:
Chapter IILiterature ReviewIntroduc
- Page 30 and 31:
the umbrella of this trend (Abed Ha
- Page 32 and 33:
2009; Fraser et al., 2007, Remeirs
- Page 34 and 35:
3. The rapid technological, economi
- Page 36 and 37:
1. Informing teachers about changes
- Page 38 and 39:
2. Changes in students‟ learning
- Page 40 and 41:
(good) condition of a people as lon
- Page 42 and 43:
In brief, the success of INSET prog
- Page 44 and 45:
1. Training with the traditional no
- Page 46 and 47:
2.6.2 Innovative modelsThe innovati
- Page 48 and 49:
2. Some participants in the group m
- Page 50 and 51:
According to Lakshami (2009, p.14)
- Page 52 and 53:
These six major components of the I
- Page 54 and 55:
To conclude, overcoming all previou
- Page 56 and 57:
2. Participant learning, which meas
- Page 58 and 59:
Table (2.1)Guskey’s Evaluative Mo
- Page 60:
2.8 Contemporary Principles of High
- Page 63 and 64:
• Planning INSET content in the l
- Page 65:
1. Survey questionnaires.2. Open-en
- Page 68 and 69:
Section IIAn Overview of Related Pr
- Page 70 and 71:
In addition, the studies purposes,
- Page 72 and 73:
constraints, and lack of practical
- Page 74 and 75:
importantly conducting more detaile
- Page 76 and 77:
showed positive participants satisf
- Page 78 and 79:
A further relevant study was perfor
- Page 80 and 81:
school principals and teachers is n
- Page 82 and 83:
teachers' attitudes, beliefs and pr
- Page 84 and 85:
lack of openness to change, lack of
- Page 86 and 87:
Following the same track of evaluat
- Page 88 and 89:
levels of achievements. Thus, a rec
- Page 90 and 91:
Under the same umbrella, Podhajski
- Page 92 and 93:
101 students in the control group.
- Page 94 and 95:
utilizing collaboration, taking adv
- Page 96 and 97:
IntroductionChapter IIIMethodology3
- Page 98 and 99:
Table: (3.1)Distribution According
- Page 100 and 101:
eferred to either as trends, standa
- Page 102 and 103:
3. Researchers ListsThis category i
- Page 104 and 105:
2. Most of the surveyed countries h
- Page 106 and 107:
5. The third draft was distributed
- Page 108 and 109:
Table (3.5)The Final Construction o
- Page 110 and 111:
14 0.63915 0.80715 0.52717 0.51518
- Page 112 and 113:
of this domain are significant at
- Page 114 and 115:
Table (3.13)Cronbach's Alpha Correl
- Page 116 and 117:
3. Information can be obtained more
- Page 118 and 119:
5. Getting the permission from UNRW
- Page 120 and 121:
Chapter IVThe Study FindingsIntrodu
- Page 122 and 123:
established in December 1964 as a j
- Page 124 and 125:
2. Training TechniquesThe main trai
- Page 126 and 127:
2. To provide English teachers with
- Page 128 and 129:
4.2 The Answer of the Second Questi
- Page 130 and 131:
4. Training Programme Content (62.1
- Page 132 and 133:
(applicable - can be applied in cla
- Page 134 and 135:
The previous Table (4.5) clarifies
- Page 136 and 137:
Table (4. 7) also shows that:• Th
- Page 138 and 139:
10 (are applied systematically (at
- Page 140 and 141:
In addition, Table (4.11) shows tha
- Page 142 and 143:
In addition, Table (4.13) shows tha
- Page 144 and 145:
Table (4.20) below shows the freque
- Page 146 and 147: NoKruskal -Wallis teststatisticP-va
- Page 148 and 149: DomainKruskal -Wallis teststatistic
- Page 150 and 151: Table (4.21)Frequencies and the per
- Page 152 and 153: 8. Traditional but good and needed
- Page 154 and 155: 4.5.5 Question (5): “What comment
- Page 156 and 157: 4.6 The Answer of the Sixth Questio
- Page 158 and 159: Chapter VDiscussion, Conclusions, a
- Page 160 and 161: Acknowledging such limitations, EDC
- Page 162 and 163: proved in the questionnaire results
- Page 164 and 165: (68.26%) and item number 9 (develop
- Page 166 and 167: • Lack of overall policies and co
- Page 168 and 169: 4. Lack of practicality, in the sen
- Page 170 and 171: 4. Inadequate follow up of the prog
- Page 172 and 173: than the other districts. This resu
- Page 174 and 175: give us more stimulation and it wil
- Page 176 and 177: 5.6.2 DifferencesIn contrast to the
- Page 178 and 179: training facilities. The Suggested
- Page 180 and 181: particular issues as proved within
- Page 182 and 183: 6. Trainers’ selectionRashed (200
- Page 184 and 185: • Recent: using recent tools as p
- Page 186 and 187: Figure (5.1): the Suggested Evaluat
- Page 188 and 189: The Future Suggested INSETProgramme
- Page 190 and 191: 9. Lack of focus on the linguistic
- Page 192 and 193: 3. Establishing planning and evalua
- Page 194 and 195: Recommendations for Educationalists
- Page 198 and 199: Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Trudy,
- Page 200 and 201: Darling-Hammond, L.,Wei,R., Andree,
- Page 202 and 203: Guskey. ( 1997) Research Needs to L
- Page 204 and 205: Ji -Kim, S. (2008). An Examination
- Page 206 and 207: Marek, E. A., & Methven, S. B. (199
- Page 208 and 209: Porter, A., Garet,M., Desimore L, B
- Page 210 and 211: Strucchelli, A. (2009). Inquiry in
- Page 212 and 213: Appendices199
- Page 214 and 215: Appendix (2) Studies ListNO The Stu
- Page 216 and 217: NO ThecountryAppendix (4) Countries
- Page 218 and 219: Appendix (5) The Final List of the
- Page 220 and 221: Appendix (6) the First Draft of the
- Page 222 and 223: Appendix(7) The second Draft of the
- Page 224 and 225: Training Programme Evaluation Tools
- Page 226 and 227: Appendix (8) The Third Draft of the
- Page 228 and 229: Peer ObservationIn its simplest mea
- Page 230 and 231: Appendix (9) The Final Questionnair
- Page 232 and 233: Peer ObservationIn its simplest mea
- Page 234 and 235: Appendix (10) Interview Consultatio
- Page 236 and 237: Line Transcript Text Open codeInter
- Page 238 and 239: Line Transcript text Open codeParti
- Page 240 and 241: contemporary techniques and methods
- Page 242 and 243: ..you may say the allowed…the ava
- Page 244 and 245: Participant 1 : we dream of a day t
- Page 246 and 247:
Appendix (12) Questionnaire Consult
- Page 248 and 249:
Appendix (14) Permission (1)235
- Page 250 and 251:
Appendix (16) Focused Group Intervi
- Page 252 and 253:
3..73..7/6/21-6/35/6/33-6/18The Tra
- Page 254 and 255:
Content of Training Course Programm
- Page 256 and 257:
NoNo NeedLow NeedModerateNeedHighNe
- Page 258 and 259:
Part V: INSET programme Evaluation
- Page 260 and 261:
Appendix (21) Suggested Useful Webs
- Page 262:
بسن اهلل الرحوي الر