Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Patterns in Soil Carbon Distribution in the Usa Basin (Russia): Linking SoilProperties to Environmental Variables in Constrained Gradient AnalysisGustaf Hugelius, Peter KuhryDepartment of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, SwedenIntroductionArctic and subarctic ecosystems harbour large reservoirsof soil organic matter (SOM) and are considered keycomponents in the global carbon (C) cycle (White et al.2000). To a large degree, this C is found in cryosols and cryichistosols, where subzero temperatures limits decomposition(Davidson & Janssens 2006). We compile and analyse adatabase describing soil C properties, permafrost conditions,and vegetation in the Usa Basin of Northeastern EuropeanRussia. We update previous calculations of landscape soilC storage for the whole Usa Basin and describe generalpatterns of landscape C allocation with respect to vegetationand permafrost. We analyse a subset of the database inconstrained gradient analysis combined with Monte Carlopermutations to determine how an array of environmentalvariables are linked to site-specific soil quantity and quality.Study AreaThe Usa River Basin straddles the Arctic Circle inNortheastern European Russia, covering some 93,500 km 2 .Spruce dominated taiga covers the southern parts of thebasin and gradually gives way to open ground in a widetaiga-tundra transition zone. Isolated permafrost first appearsin peatlands of this transition zone, but increases as tundrabegins to dominate the landscape. The northern lowlandparts of the basin are dominated by tundra and peatland withextensive permafrost. Subalpine forests of Larch and Firgrow in the foothills of the Ural Mountains, which denotethe eastern border of the basin.MethodsThe analysed database contains soil chemical and physicaldescriptions from 363 different sites and includes both uplandsoils and peat. For each site, the soil database lists vegetationcover, soil type (FAO-WRB), depth of soil genetic horizons,top organics, and active layer (if permafrost is present).Carbon storage is calculated to 30 and 100 cm referencedepths in mineral soils and to full depth in peatlands. Fora subset of the database there is also data on nitrogen (N)content. The C:N ratio of peat decreases as the material isdegraded and is considered a useful proxy for quality (Kuhry& Vitt 1996). We also analyse a GIS database of the UsaBasin containing maps of soils (Mazhitova et al. 2003) andpermafrost (Oberman & Mazhitova, 2003) as well as 100m resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and a satelliteLand Cover Classification (LCC, 30*30m Landsat TM data,Virtanen et al. 2004). Climate data is interpolated fromthe 16 km grid of the HIRHAM regional climate model(Christensen & Kuhry 2000).AnalysesFor the purpose of Soil C calculations and upscaling, theUsa Basin is divided into ecoclimatic regions (Fig. 1). Thesites in the database are ordered according to region andvegetation. Mean soil C content is then calculated for eachvegetation type in the separate regions. We also calculate theproportion of C that is stored in Cryosols. The results areupscaled to full areal coverage using vegetation data fromthe LCC.For a subset of lowland sites (n = 68), soil properties areanalysed with Redundancy Analysis (RDA). This constrainedordination technique is used to assess the relationshipswithin and between two separate data matrices of responseand environmental variables.For each pedon, a total of nine soil response variablesare included: 1–3: Carbon storage (kgC/m 2 ) in threedepth intervals (0–30 cm, 30–100 cm, and >100 cm);4–6: percentage of C that is in top organics, in peat andin permafrost; 7: Bulk Density (BD, g/cm3); 8–9: C:Nratio of organic soil horizons and C:N ratio of mineral soilhorizons.The environmental variables permafrost, vegetation, andsoil are available from field observations as well as geomaticsources. The Topographic Wetness Index is calculated froma DEM. Climate variables are derived from the HIRHAMmodel.We perform RDAs of the response variables, separatelyusing each environmental variable to constrain the ordination(software CANOCO 4.5). The explanatory power of eachFigure 1. Map showing the coverage of ecoclimatic regions in theUsa Basin with the HIRHAM grid, railway, and topography.105
Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co n f e r e n c e o n Pe r m a f r o s tenvironmental variable is determined through Monte Carlopermutations of the canonical eigenvalues of each RDA (999permutations).To further constrain the ordination, the variables that arefound to be statistically significant are tested together in aRDA Monte Carlo forward selection process (p-value 95%Table 1. Area and C storage for regions and whole basin.RegionAreakm 230 cmkgC/m 2100 cmkgC/m 2TotalkgC/m 2Northern Taiga 4,709 10.4 22.3 31.0Extreme N. Taiga 22,600 11.2 27.3 38.3Forest-Tundra 31,245 11.5 27.4 37.3Tundra 24,720 11.2 27.1 38.1Mountains 10,210 7.1 12.7 12.8Whole Basin 93,484 10.8 25.5 34.8Table 2. Summary of tested environmental variables.Variable Type Variable p-valueSite Permafrost
Page 1:
NICOP 2008 Ninth <
Page 6 and 7:
ContentsPreface ...................
Page 8 and 9:
Mapping and Modeling the Distributi
Page 10 and 11:
Satellite Observations of Frozen Gr
Page 13 and 14:
xiiIce Wedge Thermal Regime in Nort
Page 15 and 16:
xivPermafrost Response to Dynamics
Page 17 and 18:
xvi
Page 19 and 20:
NICOP SponsorsUniversitiesUniversit
Page 22 and 23:
Deep Permafrost Studies at the Lupi
Page 24 and 25:
Effect of Fire on Pond Dynamics in
Page 26 and 27:
Cryological Status of Russian Soils
Page 28 and 29:
Acoustical Surveys of Methane Plume
Page 30 and 31:
Permafrost Delineation Near Fairban
Page 32 and 33:
Preparatory Work for a Permanent Ge
Page 34 and 35:
A Provisional Soil Map of the Trans
Page 36 and 37:
Martian Permafrost Depths from Orbi
Page 38 and 39:
Time Series Analyses of Active Micr
Page 40 and 41:
Impact of Permafrost Degradation on
Page 42 and 43:
DC Resistivity Soundings Across a P
Page 44 and 45:
Modeling Thermal and Moisture Regim
Page 46 and 47:
A Provisional Permafrost Map of the
Page 48 and 49:
Alpine Permafrost Distribution at M
Page 50 and 51:
Cryogenic Formations of the Caucasu
Page 52 and 53:
Modeling Potential Climatic Change
Page 54 and 55:
A Hypothesis: A Condition of Growth
Page 56 and 57:
Modeled Continual Surface Water Sto
Page 58 and 59:
Freeze/Thaw Properties of Tundra So
Page 60 and 61:
Discontinuous Permafrost Distributi
Page 62 and 63:
Thermal Regime Within an Arctic Was
Page 64 and 65:
Seasonal and Interannual Variabilit
Page 66 and 67:
Twelve-Year Thaw Progression Data f
Page 68 and 69:
Continued Permafrost Warming in Nor
Page 70 and 71:
Landsliding Following Forest Fire o
Page 72 and 73:
A Permafrost Model Incorporating Dy
Page 74 and 75:
Seasonal Sources of Soil Respiratio
Page 76 and 77: Greenland Permafrost Temperature Si
Page 78 and 79: The Importance of Snow Cover Evolut
Page 80 and 81: The Account of Long-Term Air Temper
Page 82 and 83: The Combined Isotopic Analysis of L
Page 84 and 85: Adaptating and Managing Nunavik’s
Page 86 and 87: Human Experience of Cryospheric Cha
Page 88 and 89: HiRISE Observations of Fractured Mo
Page 90 and 91: A Soil Freeze-Thaw Model Through th
Page 92 and 93: Mapping and Modeling the Distributi
Page 94 and 95: First Results of Ground Surface Tem
Page 96 and 97: Historical Changes in the Seasonall
Page 98 and 99: Rock Glaciers in the Kåfjord Area,
Page 100 and 101: Snowpack Evolution on Permafrost, N
Page 102 and 103: Climate Change in Permafrost Region
Page 104 and 105: Maximizing Construction Season in a
Page 106 and 107: Pleistocene Sand-Wedge, Composite-W
Page 109 and 110: Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co
Page 125: Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co
Page 159 and 160: Ni N t h iN t e r N at i o N a l Co
Page 177 and 178:
Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Ni N t h iN t e r N at i o N a l Co
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
370Huang, B. 339Hugelius, G. 105, 1
Page 393:
372
show all

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?