12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Sensitivity of a Model Projecti<strong>on</strong> of Near-Surface <strong>Permafrost</strong> Degradati<strong>on</strong> toSoil Column Depth and Representati<strong>on</strong> of Soil Organic MatterDavid M. LawrenceNati<strong>on</strong>al Center for Atmospheric <strong>Research</strong>, Boulder, CO, USAAndrew G. SlaterCooperative Institute for <strong>Research</strong> in the Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Sciences, Boulder, CO, USAVladimir RomanovskyUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USADmitry NicolskyUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks, AK, USAIntroducti<strong>on</strong>Coupled global climate models (GCMs) are advancing tothe point that many of the biogeophysical, biogeochemical,and hydrological interacti<strong>on</strong>s and feedbacks that are directlyor indirectly related to permafrost degradati<strong>on</strong> are or will so<strong>on</strong>be captured. Here, we describe and analyze improvements inthe depicti<strong>on</strong> of permafrost in the Community Land Model(CLM), CLM is the global land-surface scheme that isincluded in the Community Climate System Model (CCSM).These improvements to CLM represent another step towardsa more complete depicti<strong>on</strong> of the integrated Arctic processesin a global modeling system.In Lawrence and Slater (2005), we presented data fromCCSM3 simulati<strong>on</strong>s indicating that the extent of near-surfacepermafrost may c<strong>on</strong>tract substantially during the 21 st centuryas arctic temperatures soar. Here, we examine the sensitivityof these near-surface permafrost degradati<strong>on</strong> projecti<strong>on</strong>s tothe incorporati<strong>on</strong> of a deeper soil column and the explicittreatment of the thermal and hydrologic properties of soilorganic matter. The results presented here are excerptedfrom our recently published study (Lawrence et al. 2008).ModelCLM (for a detailed technical descripti<strong>on</strong> see Oles<strong>on</strong> etal. 2004) can be run in both offline mode or as a comp<strong>on</strong>entof CCSM. The land surface is represented by fracti<strong>on</strong>alcoverage of lakes, wetland, bare soil, glacier, and up to fourplant functi<strong>on</strong>al types (PFT) for each grid box. Processessimulated by CLM include heat transfer in soil and snow,hydrology of canopy, soil, and snow, and stomatal physiologyand photosynthesis. Fluxes of energy and moisture aremodeled independently for each surface type and aggregatedbefore being passed to the atmosphere model. CLM3includes a five-layer snow model which simulates processessuch as accumulati<strong>on</strong>, melt, compacti<strong>on</strong>, snow aging, andwater transfer across layers. Simulati<strong>on</strong>s with the standardversi<strong>on</strong> of CLM are referred to as CONTROL.Organic soilNicolsky et al. (2007) show that accounting for the physicalproperties of soil organic matter significantly improves soiltemperature simulati<strong>on</strong>s. In Lawrence and Slater (2007), wedescribe how organic soil and its impact <strong>on</strong> soil thermal andhydraulic properties can be implemented into CLM. Briefly,a geographically distributed and profiled soil carb<strong>on</strong> densitydataset for CLM is derived by taking the gridded GlobalSoil Data Task soil carb<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tent dataset and distributingthe carb<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tent for each grid box vertically through theCLM This dataset is then used to calculate the organic soilor mixed organic and mineral soil thermal and hydrologicproperties for each soil layer. Simulati<strong>on</strong>s using this organicmatter dataset al<strong>on</strong>g with the revised parameterizati<strong>on</strong>s arereferred to as SOILCARB.Deep soilAlexeev et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strate that the depth of thebottom boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> str<strong>on</strong>gly influences seas<strong>on</strong>al andl<strong>on</strong>ger time-scale soil temperature dynamics. Soil depths ofgreater than 30 m are preferred to reas<strong>on</strong>ably simulate theannual cycle and decadal trends of subsurface temperatures.We test CLM with soil depths ranging from 25 m to 125m by adding from 4 to 7 exp<strong>on</strong>entially thicker layers tothe original 10 level soil model. Experiments with a deepsoil c<strong>on</strong>figurati<strong>on</strong> (and organic matter) are referred to asSOILCARB_DS50 and SOILCARB_DS125.ResultsFigure 1 shows annual cycle-depth temperature plotsfor CONTROL, SOILCARB, and SOILCARB_DS50compared to observed annual cycle-depth temperatures.The broad qualitative improvements in the simulati<strong>on</strong> areimmediately apparent. The active layer thickness (ALT),defined as the depth to which the soil thaws each summer,is much shallower in SOILCARB and SOILCARB_DS50,and its level is in much closer agreement with observati<strong>on</strong>s.Soil temperatures below the active layer are also improved,especially in SOILCARB_DS50, where the removal of thezero flux boundary at 3.5 m results in smaller and morerealistic seas<strong>on</strong>al temperature variati<strong>on</strong>s at depths below 2m.We then force the improved CLM with 6-hourly data froma fully coupled CCSM3 20 th and 21 st century simulati<strong>on</strong>.The resulting time series of near-surface permafrost extentare shown in Figure 2 for the CONTROL, SOILCARB,SOILCARB_DS50, and SOILCARB_DS125 experiments.169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!