12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Soil Freeze-Thaw Model Through the Soil Water Characteristic CurveStefano EndrizziDepartment of Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engineering, University of Trento, ItalyRiccardo Rig<strong>on</strong>Department of Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engineering, University of Trento, ItalyMatteo DallAmicoDepartment of Civil and Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Engineering, University of Trento, ItalyIntroducti<strong>on</strong>The mathematical descripti<strong>on</strong> of the freeze-thaw behaviorof soil mainly depends <strong>on</strong> its texture. Usually coarsegrainedsoils follow a moving boundary with phase change,comm<strong>on</strong>ly referred to as the Stefan problem, whereas finegrainedsoils show the existence of a “frozen-fringe” (Fowler& Krantz 1994) of partially frozen soil between frozen andunfrozen regi<strong>on</strong>s. Therefore, the possibility of includingthe freezing characteristic of soil in a model (Hanss<strong>on</strong> et al.2004) appears promising, as it allows the descripti<strong>on</strong> of thefreezing/thawing cycles of natural soils.The goal of this work is to propose a freezing soil schemebased <strong>on</strong> soil freezing characteristic curves and to test itagainst the analytical soluti<strong>on</strong> of the Neumann problem.The Freeze-Thaw ModelThe freezing soil model can be explained by the followingequati<strong>on</strong>s: ∂TC T∂t + L f∂W∂t= ∂ ∂z λ T∂T∂z∂θρ w∂θw=−ρ ii= ∂W ∂t ∂t ∂tThe first term represents the energy budget equati<strong>on</strong>where θ wand θ i(-) are the volumetric c<strong>on</strong>tent of waterand ice, respectively; n is the porosity, ρ wand ρ i(Kg/m 3 )are the density of water and ice, respectively; W (Kg/m 3 )is the quantity of water in the c<strong>on</strong>trol volume subject tophase change; L f(J/Kg) is the latent heat of fusi<strong>on</strong>; T (°C)is the temperature; and z (m) is the soil depth coordinate.C T=C s(1-n)+c wθ wρ w+c iθ iρ i(J m -3 K -1 ) is the total thermalcapacity of the soil, where C sis the volumetric heat capacityof the soil, and c wand c i, the mass heat capacity of liquid(1-n) θw θiand ice, respectively. λ T=K e(λ sλ wλ i)+(1-K e)λ dry(W m -1K -1 ) represents the thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity of the soil matrixand follows the formulati<strong>on</strong> of Farouki (1981), where λ s, λ w,and λ iare the thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivities of soil, water, and ice,respectively; λ dryis the thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity of the dry soil(Johansen 1975); and K eis the Kersten number.The sec<strong>on</strong>d equati<strong>on</strong> in (1) is a closure relati<strong>on</strong> and isusually known as the “no flow c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>”; that is, the waterflux during phase change may be neglected (Fuchs et al.1978). The left-hand side (LHS) of the sec<strong>on</strong>d equati<strong>on</strong>represents the freezing/thawing rate and may be describedby proper equilibrium and closure relati<strong>on</strong>s as follows:(1) 1g ⋅ p Lw=f⋅ Tρ wg⋅ 273.15 =ψ (T) eqθ w−θ r( n −θ r ) = [ 1+ ( −α ⋅ψ eq) β] − ( 1− 1 β)The first equati<strong>on</strong> represents the thermodynamic equilibriumduring phase change, when pressure head ψ (m) and T (°C)satisfy the Clapeyr<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong> (Christoffersen & Tulazczyk2003). The sec<strong>on</strong>d equati<strong>on</strong> represents the unsaturatedsoil c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> by using the soil water characteristic curve(SWCC) according to the Van Genuchten (1980) model,where α (m -1 ) and β (-) are Van Genuchten parameters and θ ris the residual water c<strong>on</strong>tent.Eventually, the allowed unfrozen water c<strong>on</strong>tent can beplotted against the temperature, and becomes the soil freezingcharacteristic curve (SFCC) (see Fig. 1). Applying the chainrule to ∂θ w/∂t=∂θ w/∂ψ•∂ψ/∂T•∂Τ/∂t the first equati<strong>on</strong> in (1)may be rewritten as:L 2 f C T+ ρ wC H ∂T g⋅ 273.15∂t = ∂ ∂z λ ∂T T ∂z where C H=∂θ w/∂ψ (m -1 ) is the hydraulic capacity of thesoil. The term in squared brackets is often referred to asthe apparent heat capacity (Williams & Smith 1989) andaccounts for both sensible and latent heat capacity of soils.The numerical schemeThe numerical model follows a finite differencediscretizati<strong>on</strong> with a Crank Nichols<strong>on</strong> scheme. At the firstiterati<strong>on</strong>, the system is solved neglecting phase change inorder to calculate the temperature at the time step k+1 (T k+1 ):if T k+1 0, then the freezing soil module is activated.Given the unfrozen water c<strong>on</strong>tent θ ueqat the equilibrium, fouralternatives may occur: (a) T k+1 θ ueq: cooling soiland excess water c<strong>on</strong>tent; (b) T k+1 >T k and θ w>θ weq: warmingsoil and excess water c<strong>on</strong>tent; (c) T k+1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!