12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co n f e r e n c e o n Pe r m a f r o s tThermal C<strong>on</strong>ductivity(W m -1 K -1 )Thermal C<strong>on</strong>ductivity(W m -1 K -1 )Thermal C<strong>on</strong>ductivity(W m -1 K -1 )0.60.50.40.30.20.1Live/Dead MossFeather mossSphagnum spp.0.000.620 40 60 80 100VWC (%)0.5Fibric0.40.30.20.10.000.620 40 60 80 100Mesic/Humic VWC (%)0.50.40.30.20.10.00 20 40 60 80 100VWC (%)Figure 2. Linear regressi<strong>on</strong>s between thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity andvolumetric water c<strong>on</strong>tent in live/dead moss (top panel), fibricorganic matter (middle panel), and mesic/humic organic matter(bottom panel). The regressi<strong>on</strong>s were fit separately for feather moss(solid line) and Sphagnum (dashed line).organic horiz<strong>on</strong>s and moss types (range of R 2 values: 0.53–0.76; all P values < 0.0001). Increasing VWC of feathermoss from 10 to 40% increased thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity nearlythree-fold, whereas increasing VWC of Sphagnum from 10to 60% increased thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity by five-fold (Fig.2, top panel). We did not observe a very str<strong>on</strong>g differencebetween feather moss- and Sphagnum-derived organicmatter (fibric, mesic/humic). On average, increasing VWCof fibric horiz<strong>on</strong>s by 50% resulted in a four-fold increasein thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity (Fig. 2, middle panel). Similarly,increasing VWC of mesic/humic horiz<strong>on</strong>s by 70% resultedin a three-fold increase in thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity values (Fig.2, bottom panel).Discussi<strong>on</strong>Thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity of organic soil horiz<strong>on</strong>s in blackspruce forests of Interior Alaska is positively correlatedwith moisture c<strong>on</strong>tent. Thus, during the summer, variabilityin soil moisture c<strong>on</strong>tent will greatly influence rates of heattransfer from surface to deep soil layers (Yoshikawa et al.2003). During winter, heat fluxes through the active layer areprimarily governed by ice c<strong>on</strong>tent. However, unfrozen watercan persist in deep peat and mineral soils during freezeupand cooling of the active layer, modifying soil thermalproperties and heat transfer (Romanovsky & Osterkamp2000). Increased unfrozen water c<strong>on</strong>tent during wintermay reduce the thermal offset and increase the potential forpermafrost thaw.To evaluate the stability of permafrost in black sprucestands of Interior Alaska, we have developed a simplemodel to predict thermal offset (modified from Kudryavtsev1981). This approach combines field measurements of soilmoisture with laboratory measures of thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivityand moisture, reported here. A comparative analysis of theobserved thermal offset values with calculated values iscurrently in progress and will be discussed.ReferencesBurn, C.R., & Smith, C.A.S. 1988. Observati<strong>on</strong>s of the“thermal offset” in near-surface mean annual groundtemperatures at several sites near Mayo, Yuk<strong>on</strong>Territory, Canada. Arctic 41: 99-104.Kudryavtsev, V.A. (ed.) 1981. <strong>Permafrost</strong>, short editi<strong>on</strong>.MSU Press (in Russian).Lachenbruch, A.H., & Marshall B.V. 1986. Changingclimate: Geothermal evidence from permafrost in theAlaskan Arctic. Science 234: 689-696.O’D<strong>on</strong>nell, J.A., Turetsky, M.R., Harden, J.W., Manies,K.L., Pruett, L.E., Shetler, G. & Neff, J.C. In review.Interactive effects of fire, soil climate and moss <strong>on</strong>CO2 fluxes in black spruce ecosystems of interiorAlaska.Osterkamp, T.E., & Romanovsky V.E. 1999. Evidence forwarming and thawing of disc<strong>on</strong>tinuous permafrostin Alaska. <strong>Permafrost</strong> and Periglacial Processes 10:17-37.Overduin, P.P, Kane, D.L., & van Lo<strong>on</strong>, W.K.P. 2006.Measuring thermal c<strong>on</strong>ductivity in freezing andthawing soil using the soil temperature resp<strong>on</strong>se toheating. Cold Regi<strong>on</strong>s Science and Technology 45:8-22.Romanovsky, V.E. & Osterkamp, T.E. 2000. Effects ofunfrozen water <strong>on</strong> heat and mass transport processesin the active layer and permafrost. <strong>Permafrost</strong> andPeriglacial Processes 11: 219-239.Yoshikawa, K., Bolt<strong>on</strong>, W.R., Romanovsky, V.E., Fukuda,M. & Hinzman, L.D. 2003. Impacts of wildfire <strong>on</strong>the permafrost in the boreal forests of interior Alaska.Journal of Geophysical <strong>Research</strong> 108: (D1): 8148,doi:10.1029/2001JD000438..228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!