12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co n f e r e n c e o n Pe r m a f r o s tTable 1. Summarized temperature c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s at different depthsat the two sites in the KC for the period 13.09.2006–25.07.2007(10.5 m<strong>on</strong>ths) based <strong>on</strong> MTLs. MPT = mean period temperaturein °C; DTF-Max = maximum daily temperature fluctuati<strong>on</strong> duringthis period in Kelvin; FDD = freezing degree days; TDD = thawingdegree days. The snow cover durati<strong>on</strong> was estimated based <strong>on</strong> lowtemperature fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s (for locati<strong>on</strong>s of the MTLs see Fig. 2).KC1 (snow cover 1.5 m<strong>on</strong>ths)KC2 (snow cover 4 m<strong>on</strong>ths)DepthMPTDTF-MaxFDDTDDDepthMPTDTF-MaxFDDTDDFigure 1. The two cirques Kögele Cirque (KC) and Hinteres LangtalCirque (HLC) and their extent of surface ice and snow in c. 1850,1969, 1997, and 2006. The locati<strong>on</strong> of the Hinteres Langtalkar RockGlacier/HLRG (in 2002) is indicated. Findings of sedimentary icesince 2003 in the HLC are asterisked: *1 = in 2006 – below 30 cmof debris; *2 = in 2006 and 2007 – a c. 20 m l<strong>on</strong>g and 10 K at thesurface, 4–5 K at 10 cm depth, 2.2 K at 20 cm depth (at K2at the ice/debris boundary), and less than 1 K at 50 cm at K1,indicating a substantial damping effect of the debris layer.The lowest sensors at both sites reveal low thawing degreeday/TDD values which can be explained by the proximity tothe underlying buried ice mass and by a thin active layer atthese sheltered locati<strong>on</strong>s at such high altitudes.L<strong>on</strong>g-term landscape dynamics: KC versus HLCThe data presented here c<strong>on</strong>firm the fact that, already,slightly different topoclimatic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s are sufficient togenerate over a l<strong>on</strong>g time span a rock glacier in <strong>on</strong>e cirqueand a normal glacier in the neighbouring cirque. The rateof ice and debris input to the cirque during the past wasdominated by the former in the KC, whereas probably bythe latter in the HLC. A thin active layer helps to preservea degrading debris-covered glacier remnant. Subsequentincorporati<strong>on</strong> of such a debris-covered ice mass into a rockglacier body might be regarded as an important nourishmentfactor; at least this could have been the case at the HLRG.AcknowledgmentsThis study was carried out within the framework of theproject ALPCHANGE (www.alpchange.at) financed by theAustrian Science Fund (FWF). The air photographs (1969,1997, and 1998) were kindly provided by Viktor Kaufmann.ReferencesHaeberli, W. 1983. <strong>Permafrost</strong>-glacier relati<strong>on</strong>ships in theSwiss Alps: Today and in the past. Proceedings, 4thIntl. C<strong>on</strong>f. <strong>on</strong> <strong>Permafrost</strong>, Fairbanks, AK, July 17–22:415-420.Kellerer-Pirklbauer, A. & Kaufmann, V. 2007. Paraglacial talusinstability in recently deglaciated cirques (SchoberGroup, Austria). Proceedings, 9th Intl. Symposium HighMountain Remote Sensing Cartography (HMRSC-IX),Graz, Austria, Sept. 14–22, 2006: 121-130.130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!