12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ni n t h In t e r n at i o n a l Co n f e r e n c e o n Pe r m a f r o s t(adjusted R 2 ) and Mallow’s CP statistics. When a minimumCP statistic and maximum R 2 are selecti<strong>on</strong> criteria, theresult is the best fit model with the minimum number ofparameters.ResultsNPP and ecosystem C exchangeIn both 2004 and 2006, NEE, GPP, and Reco measuredwith the closed chambers were significantly correlated withNPP measured with the point-framing method (Fig. 1a,b, c). These same ecosystem C exchange variables weresignificantly correlated with active layer thickness, but NPPbetter described overall variati<strong>on</strong> (not shown). The slope andintercepts of the NPP vs. Reco and GPP relati<strong>on</strong>ships werenot significantly different between years, but the slope of theNEE lines did differ significantly between years.Relati<strong>on</strong>ship between carb<strong>on</strong> exchange and specific plantfuncti<strong>on</strong>al groupsWe previously reported that across this upland tussocktundra landscape, thermokarst corresp<strong>on</strong>ded to a relativedecrease in the NPP of graminoids while moss and deciduousshrub NPP increased (Schuur et al. 2007). Here we usemultiple regressi<strong>on</strong> analysis to examine whether the NPPof individual functi<strong>on</strong>al groups corresp<strong>on</strong>ded to a changein NEE, Reco or GPP. For NEE, the regressi<strong>on</strong> procedureselected a different combinati<strong>on</strong> of plant functi<strong>on</strong>al typesin different years. In 2004, the variance in NEE was bestexplained with evergreen shrub NPP (+ effect in model)and the coverage of dead moss (- effect in model). In 2006,the variance in NEE was best explained by moss, evergreenshrub, and graminoid NPP. Interestingly, in neither yearwere deciduous shrubs a comp<strong>on</strong>ent of the NEE modeldespite the NPP of this functi<strong>on</strong>al group generally increasingwith active layer thickness (Schuur et al. 2007). Indeed, forGPP deciduous shrubs were also removed from the overallmodel in both years. This suggests that additi<strong>on</strong>al C uptakeby deciduous shrubs was effectively replacing the C uptakeof the different functi<strong>on</strong>al groups that were lost.AcknowledgmentsWe thank Michelle Mack for assistance in processingvegetati<strong>on</strong> samples. Terry Chapin provided laboratoryresources. Emily Tissier, Jamie Hollingsworth, and BrianCharlt<strong>on</strong> provided logistical support. Tom Osterkampundertook the early research that made this project possible,and Guy Adema and Larissa Yocum of Denali Nati<strong>on</strong>al Parkand Preserve provided logistical support.GPP (g C m -2 )Reco (g C m -2 )NEE (g C m -2 )7006005004003000200-100-200-300-400-500-600-700300250200150100500-50-100200420062004 r=0.73, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!