12.07.2015 Views

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

Ninth International Conference on Permafrost ... - IARC Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Influence of Shrubs <strong>on</strong> Soil Temperatures in Alpine TundraIsla H. Myers-SmithUniversity of Alberta, Edm<strong>on</strong>t<strong>on</strong>, Alberta, CanadaDavid S. HikUniversity of Alberta, Edm<strong>on</strong>t<strong>on</strong>, Alberta, CanadaIntroducti<strong>on</strong>With a warming climate, northern ecosystems will facesignificant ecological changes such as permafrost thaw,increased forest fire frequency, and shifting ecosystemboundaries, including the spread of tall shrubs into tundra. Innorthern mountain ranges such as those in the southwesternYuk<strong>on</strong>, the shrub line will likely advance up mountain slopeswith climate warming. In the last 50 years, rapid shrubexpansi<strong>on</strong> has been documented in arctic Alaska (Sturm et al.2001a, Tape et al. 2006) and the Northern Yuk<strong>on</strong> and NWT(Trevor Lantz, pers. com.) using repeat aerial photography.Paleoecological evidence suggests that tall shrubs lastinvaded tundra ecosystems in Alaska and northwesternCanada between 7,000 and 12,000 years ago, during thewarm post-glacial period (Ritchie 1984). Growing seas<strong>on</strong>temperatures are again warming in Alaska and westernCanada (Stafford et al. 2000), and c<strong>on</strong>current with this trend,satellite imagery shows a greening of the Arctic (Stow etal. 2004). The correlati<strong>on</strong> between warming and greeninghas been used to link climate change with shrub expansi<strong>on</strong>(Sturm et al. 2001a); however, the exact mechanisms drivingshrub increase are probably more complex. A combinati<strong>on</strong> ofchanges in nutrient mineralizati<strong>on</strong>, snow depth, microclimate,(Sturm et al. 2001b) disturbance (Trevor Lantz, pers. com.),and species interacti<strong>on</strong>s are most likely all c<strong>on</strong>tributingfactors to shrub expansi<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>on</strong> the landscapeInfluence of shrubs <strong>on</strong> soil temperaturesIncreased shrubs in arctic and alpine tundra alter thepartiti<strong>on</strong>ing of solar energy during the growing seas<strong>on</strong>,the distributi<strong>on</strong> and physical characteristics of snow in thewinter (List<strong>on</strong> et al. 2002), and soil thermal dynamics yearround(Sturm et al. 2001b, Sturm et al. 2005a). In the winter,snow trapping by shrubs can insulate soils (by trapping heat)and has been proposed as a positive feedback mechanismpromoting the expansi<strong>on</strong> of shrubs in the Arctic (Sturm etal. 2001b, Sturm et al. 2005a). During spring, dark-coloredshrubs that extend above the snow alter the albedo andaccelerate local snowmelt (Sturm et al. 2005b, Pomeroyet al. 2006). In summer, shading by shrubs decreases soiltemperatures under shrub canopies (Pomeroy et al. 2006).Though complex, the interacti<strong>on</strong>s between shrubs, snow,and soil warming may act as a positive feedback to shrubexpansi<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 4, Chapin et al. 2005). In additi<strong>on</strong>, wintersoil warming may enhance nutrient cycling and reduce soilcarb<strong>on</strong> stores (Mack et al. 2004).Study SiteThe field site is located in the Ruby Range Mountains(61°20′N, 139°17′W, Fig. 1) adjacent to Kluane Lake. Thisarea of the southwest Yuk<strong>on</strong> is located at the c<strong>on</strong>vergenceof the coastal and arctic air masses, and as a result, climatechange could lead to increased variability in wintertemperatures and precipitati<strong>on</strong>. The study area varies inelevati<strong>on</strong>, aspect, and proximity to glaciers, making it anideal locati<strong>on</strong> to test a shrub expansi<strong>on</strong> hypotheses.MethodsTo measure the influence of snow-capture by shrubs<strong>on</strong> soil warming, we manipulated willow (Salix spp.)cover to compare soil temperatures beneath plots with (a)intact shrubs, (b) shrubs removed, (c) artificial vegetati<strong>on</strong>canopies, and (d) adjacent, shrub-free tundra. In September2007, 6 artificial shrub and tundra plots were c<strong>on</strong>structed bycutting down shrubs and affixing them to stakes in the soil inadjacent shrub-free tundra (Fig. 2).The 6 manipulati<strong>on</strong> plots and paired c<strong>on</strong>trol m<strong>on</strong>itoringplots are instrumented with snow stakes with iButt<strong>on</strong>Thermochr<strong>on</strong> temperature loggers (Dallas Semic<strong>on</strong>ductorCorporati<strong>on</strong>, Dallas, Texas, USA) at 2, 5, 25, 50, 100, and150 cm al<strong>on</strong>g their length, and with Hobo micro stati<strong>on</strong> 12-bit temperature sensors (HOBO, Onset Computer Corp.,Massachusetts, USA), installed at 2 and 5 cm below the soilsurface. This experiment will test whether shrubs trap moresnow than the adjacent tundra, whether this snow melts outearlier in the spring seas<strong>on</strong>, and how much the trapped snowinsulates the soil.Initial ResultsFigure 1. Map of the study regi<strong>on</strong> and the Ruby Range Mountainfield site.Over the growing seas<strong>on</strong> of 2007, shrub plots weresignificantly cooler than tundra plots (for DOY 160 to 244,at 2 cm depth: 1.5°C cooler under shrubs, F 1,172= 33.9, p< 0.001, at 5 cm depth: 1.3°C cooler under shrubs, F 1,172=25.7, p < 0.001, Fig. 3).219

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!