12.07.2015 Views

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 | Access to regional air servicesMost <strong>of</strong> the UC/Ls that were located beyond the assumed access distance to regularscheduled air services across the states <strong>and</strong> territories had a population size <strong>of</strong> lessthan 2000 people. Victoria had the highest number <strong>of</strong> small UC/Ls (with a populationsize <strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people) that were located beyond the assumed access distance.It also had the highest medium UC/Ls (with a population size between 2000 <strong>and</strong>20 000) that were located beyond the assumed access distance. Other small UC/Lslocated beyond the assumed access distance were sparsely scattered across NewSouth Wales, Queensl<strong>and</strong>, South Australia <strong>and</strong> Western Australia.Based on the access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 kmFigure 4.21 is based on the assumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 km to some form <strong>of</strong> regularscheduled air services, regardless <strong>of</strong> the airport size.Based on the assumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 km to only one airport with regularscheduled air services, 1490 UC/Ls (87.2 per cent) were located within the assumedaccess distance <strong>and</strong> 219 UC/Ls (12.8 per cent) were located beyond the assumedaccess distance (Table 4.19). Of the 219 UC/Ls located beyond the assumed accessdistance, 184 UC/Ls (10.8 per cent) were in a population size <strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people,33 UC/Ls (2 per cent) were in population size between 2000 <strong>and</strong> 20 000 people <strong>and</strong> 2UC/Ls (0.1 per cent) were in a population size between 20 000 <strong>and</strong> 100 000 people.Under the assumption, a total <strong>of</strong> 16.7 million people (98 per cent) lived within theassumed access distance to regular scheduled air services (Table 4.19). Of the remaining336 000 people living beyond the assumed access distance to regular scheduled airservices, close to 113 000 people (0.6 per cent) lived in small communities <strong>of</strong> lessthan 2000 people, 141 000 people (0.8 per cent) lived in communities <strong>of</strong> 2000 to 20 000people <strong>and</strong> 81 000 people (0.5 per cent) lived in communities between 20 000 to100 000 people.It is expected that the number <strong>of</strong> UC/Ls located within the assumed access distance toregular scheduled air services is higher under the assumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 kmthan the assumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 40 km/120 km. This is due to the geographicalcoverage <strong>of</strong> a 120 km circular buffer being greater than a 40 km circular buffer.As a result <strong>of</strong> changing the assumed access distance from 40 km/120 km to just120 km, 95 UC/Ls with a population size <strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people shifted from beyondto within the access distance to regular scheduled air services. Another 48 UC/Ls witha population size between 2000 <strong>and</strong> 20 000 people moved from beyond to within theaccess distance to regular scheduled air services.Similarly, most <strong>of</strong> the decline in the number <strong>of</strong> UC/Ls located beyond theassumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 km across states <strong>and</strong> territories were due to theshift <strong>of</strong> UC/Ls with less than 2000 people from beyond to within the assumedaccess distance (Table 4.20). The shift is most prominent in Victoria.133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!