12.07.2015 Views

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BITRE | Report 1156.5 Summary <strong>and</strong> implicationsThe key findings <strong>of</strong> this chapter are summarised as follows:In 2005:1. Population in UC/Ls <strong>and</strong> access to airportsAccess to large airports• Approximately 90 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population in 992 UC/Ls was within theassumed access distance to at least one large airport.• Of the 992 UC/Ls with access to large airports, 727 UC/Ls were in a populationsize <strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people.Access to medium, small <strong>and</strong> rural airports• 7 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population in 385 UC/Ls had access to medium, small or ruralairports.• Of the 385 UC/Ls with access to medium, small or rural airports, 299 UC/Ls hada population size <strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people.In total, close to 80 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> UC/Ls with a population size <strong>of</strong>less than 2000 people (which covered 5.3 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total population in UC/Ls)were within the assumed access distance to airports with regular scheduled airservices.In fact, close to 60 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> UC/Ls with a population size<strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people were within the assumed access distance to at least onelarge airport.Population beyond the assumed access distance to airports with regular scheduledair services• Of the 3 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population in the 332 UC/Ls located beyond theassumed access distance to any airport, 279 UC/Ls fall into the population size<strong>of</strong> less than 2000 people.There is a clear association between those UC/Ls located beyond the assumedaccess distance to any airport <strong>and</strong> the population size. The number <strong>of</strong> UC/Lswithout close access to airports increases as the population size decreases.2. Average weekly income groups in UC/Ls <strong>and</strong> access to airports• Overall, 92 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population in UC/Ls around large airports receivedan average weekly income between $400 <strong>and</strong> $600.• Most <strong>of</strong> the population from UC/Ls around medium, small, rural airports<strong>and</strong> those beyond the assumed access distance to any airport also earned anaverage weekly income between $400 <strong>and</strong> $600. However, between 18 per cent<strong>and</strong> 37 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population around medium, small, rural airports <strong>and</strong>those without close access to airports earned a lower average weekly income<strong>of</strong> $200 to $400.178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!