12.07.2015 Views

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

PDF: 5191 KB - Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 | Air services in regional communities6.3 Selected socio-demographic distributionsbased on projections <strong>of</strong> passengermovements at regional airportsIn this section, passenger movements at 170 regional airports in 2005 were projectedout to 2016 using the extrapolative methods described in Chapter 5. It was found that37 regional airports exhibit marginal changes in the trend <strong>of</strong> passenger movements,84 regional airports exhibit positive trends in passenger movements, 46 regionalairports exhibited a negative trend in passenger movements <strong>and</strong> three regionalairports do not have sufficient data for projections.The projected results were used as an indicative direction <strong>of</strong> the future passengertrend <strong>of</strong> an airport. They were divided into two groups: regional airports withprojected positive trends <strong>and</strong> those with projected negative trends in passengermovements. The corresponding UC/Ls <strong>and</strong> population for each group were extractedusing spatial analysis as described in Chapter 4. Again, the assumed access distance<strong>of</strong> 40 km radius to small <strong>and</strong> rural airports <strong>and</strong> the assumed access distance <strong>of</strong> 120 kmradius to large <strong>and</strong> medium airports were used in the analysis.DemographyIt is observed that 88.8 per cent <strong>of</strong> the population (Table 6.10) from 1144 UC/Ls(Table 6.11) lived within the assumed access distance to at least one airport withprojected positive trend in passenger movements. The remaining 11 per cent <strong>of</strong> thepopulation (Table 6.10) who lived within the assumed access distance to airport(s)with projected negative trends in passenger movements were scattered over 233UC/Ls. Of these 233 UC/Ls, 178 UC/Ls were in a population size <strong>of</strong> less than 2000(0.81 per cent <strong>of</strong> all population in UC/Ls). Overall, Table 6.11 shows that the number<strong>of</strong> UC/Ls located within the assumed distance to airports with negative projectedpassenger movements increases as the population size decreases.Table 6.10 Distribution <strong>of</strong> population in UC/Ls based on projected passengermovements at regional airportsDistribution <strong>of</strong> population (per cent)Population size Projected positive trend Projected negative trend TotalLess than 2000 3.58 0.81 4.392000–19 999 8.57 1.94 10.5120 000–99 999 8.94 1.31 10.25100 000+ 67.72 7.13 74.85Total 88.80 11.20 100.00Source: BITRE time series estimates.171

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!