Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

An Organizational Knowledge Circulation Management System For Universities
Table 3. Average understanding levels in a learning design sequence (Fig. 9)
Learning activity Report 1 Report 2 Questionnaire
Understanding level 1.6087 2.5122 2.4474
Figure 12. Learning design case production by CBR
(t=2.8008, m=35.96, t(40,0.01)=2.423). So we
set the number of group members in the sequence
to three.
Self Estimation
Learners answered whether group learning was
effective or not. Negative learners’ group (difference=1.00)
improved their understanding level
more after group learning than for the positive
one (difference=0.92). The discussions in negative
groups may have different views and reach
no conclusion, but it still has an effect on learners’
understanding. We need to inspect how the context
of discussion in group learning affects learners’
understanding level in the future.
Learning Design Case Records
In Learning Design Repository of Fig. 2, there are
many learning design case records utilizing our
evaluation scale and understanding level model
shown in Fig.12. When instructors request new
case records, Learning Activity Integrate System
in Fig.2 produces new cases by traditional case
adaptation strategies (Fig.12).
153