02.12.2012 Views

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Proposed Framework <strong>for</strong> Designing Sustainable <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>for</strong> Knowledge Management Systems<br />

Table 2. Summary <strong>of</strong> design recommendations <strong>for</strong> sustainable communities <strong>of</strong> practice in knowledge<br />

management systems<br />

Design Guidelines Success Factor<br />

I. Technological features<br />

1. Site map SF1, SF2, SF7<br />

2. Search features SF7<br />

3. Document version control systems SF1, SF2, SF7<br />

II. Membership features<br />

1. Non-anonymity SF1<br />

2. Maintaining usage statistics and pr<strong>of</strong>iles SF1, SF5<br />

3. Connectivity between members – Directories, Forums, IM<br />

capabilities<br />

III. Content features<br />

1. Making it an obligatory passage point (OPP) <strong>for</strong> documents,<br />

templates, <strong>for</strong>ms etc.<br />

design KMS communities. Furthermore, they<br />

can also be used as an evaluative tool <strong>for</strong> existing<br />

KMS. Future research would add value by<br />

evaluating and testing these recommendations in<br />

a representative setting through possibly an action<br />

research. An exploratory case study <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

KMS that implement these features would also<br />

provide validity. Each recommendation could<br />

be the subject <strong>of</strong> a separate study. For example,<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> a knowledge manager or the design <strong>of</strong><br />

the search features could constitute substantial<br />

research agendas.<br />

SF1<br />

2. Home page to represent community – fresh, dynamic SF7<br />

3. Content on the home page <strong>for</strong> summary <strong>of</strong> new relevant topics,<br />

news, and highlights<br />

4. Moderation to ensure topical focus and relevance<br />

SF3, SF8<br />

SF2, SF7<br />

5. Moderation to ensure questions are answered SF3, SF5<br />

6. Moderation to encourage ‘experts’ to contribute SF3<br />

SF2, SF3, SF5, SF6,<br />

SF7<br />

7. Moderation to ensure currency <strong>of</strong> documents SF3, SF5, SF7<br />

8. Splitting into sub-communities, if size grows SF3, SF5, SF6, SF7<br />

IV. Organizational functions<br />

1. Creating and supporting role <strong>of</strong> moderator/community manager<br />

SF3, SF4<br />

This chapter has the limitations associated<br />

with a conceptual study. It needs to be validated<br />

by empirical research. The suggestions presented<br />

<strong>for</strong> future research are intended to be a guide<br />

<strong>for</strong> a research program in this area. We draw on<br />

literature in virtual communities to in<strong>for</strong>m us<br />

about the nature <strong>of</strong> communities in knowledge<br />

management systems. However, the design <strong>of</strong><br />

these communities is contingent upon organizational<br />

factors such as organization culture, norms,<br />

practices, and structure. Hence, these guidelines<br />

may not be universally applicable but need to be<br />

223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!