02.12.2012 Views

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Argentine IT Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals Forum<br />

state agenda. Many issues are not included in this<br />

agenda. In view <strong>of</strong> the present crisis Argentina is<br />

going through, with its resulting poverty, hunger,<br />

and unemployment, it would seem politically<br />

incorrect to develop technological policies in<br />

order to improve the state’s per<strong>for</strong>mance. This<br />

is the case with the E-Government National Plan<br />

because it would mean an expense in hardware<br />

and s<strong>of</strong>tware, which is not a priority. The ITNO<br />

falls under this context, making it hard to fulfill<br />

its goals.<br />

With respect to the in<strong>for</strong>mal structure <strong>of</strong> networks<br />

and CoPs, governmental control is limited,<br />

causing certain uneasiness in political authorities.<br />

This situation could be reverted if the government<br />

became familiar with their functioning.<br />

In other countries, there are also misunderstandings.<br />

Snyder and Souza Briggs (2003, p.<br />

51) state that:<br />

there are several ways to address these concerns:<br />

by seeing the emergence <strong>of</strong> CoPs as an evolutionary<br />

process, not a cataclysmic revolution;<br />

by distinguishing the knowledge-building and<br />

knowledge-sharing functions <strong>of</strong> these communities<br />

with the primarily transactional focus <strong>of</strong> product-<br />

and service-delivery units; and by understanding<br />

that collaborative, boundary-crossing networks<br />

need not mark the loss <strong>of</strong> government’s publicservice<br />

identity and influence, but rather serve as<br />

an expansion <strong>of</strong> both.<br />

Another interesting topic has to do with the<br />

possibilities to develop free s<strong>of</strong>tware in a context<br />

<strong>of</strong> scarcity <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

Indeed, it is a hard task to develop s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

without the necessary resources. However, it<br />

should be remembered that the ITPF is made up<br />

<strong>of</strong> several organizations that may be working on<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware developments with their own resources<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example, the AFIP, the Argentinean tax<br />

agency; ANSES, the pension funds administrator,<br />

and the Central Bank). This s<strong>of</strong>tware is usually<br />

made available in order to test its applicability<br />

in other sectors.<br />

It goes without saying that every agency where<br />

the s<strong>of</strong>tware is applied will need its own resources<br />

so that the s<strong>of</strong>tware can be implemented and the<br />

necessary training supplied. In some cases, directives<br />

from the ITNO are required.<br />

I have mentioned earlier some ways in which it<br />

has been possible to generate a network <strong>for</strong> the creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> LINUX training courses. I should add that<br />

the group <strong>of</strong> tutors is made up <strong>of</strong> IT experts who<br />

share their knowledge. Their tutoring is almost<br />

free. Moreover, they have designed courses <strong>for</strong><br />

public <strong>of</strong>ficials. It should be noticed that it would<br />

have been hard to find enough LINUX teachers<br />

<strong>for</strong> this task, and the few available ones would<br />

have charged very high fees. If this had been the<br />

case, the courses would not have started.<br />

The fourth challenge I would like to refer to<br />

is how the ITPF can broaden the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

competencies <strong>of</strong> IT experts.<br />

The ITPF has come a long way. At its inception,<br />

the members were against interacting with other<br />

systems, actors, or <strong>for</strong>ums. Nowadays, they are<br />

starting to change this attitude <strong>of</strong> isolation, interacting<br />

with legislators, scholars, lawyers, humanresources<br />

directors, and front-desk chiefs.<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> the ITPF is also reflected in<br />

the language its members have been adopting.<br />

Rather than just using IT jargon, they have integrated<br />

IT terms into an interlinguistic field. This<br />

attitude helps to include the addressees’ needs by<br />

letting them have a say in their decisions. Broadly<br />

speaking, IT experts are responsible <strong>for</strong> showing<br />

the way in which technology can be used to<br />

improve decision-making processes. Thus, they<br />

should be familiar with public-administration<br />

rules and the specific needs <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>ficials.<br />

The ITPF has contributed to collective knowledge<br />

about the culture <strong>of</strong> organizations in connection<br />

with in<strong>for</strong>mation and technology, the rules <strong>of</strong> the<br />

game, as well as the implicit hierarchies and their<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mal structure.<br />

Through their own experience at the ITPF, its<br />

members have also learned to work in networks<br />

to perceive the environment, communicate skills,<br />

295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!