02.12.2012 Views

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

Web-based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Catalonia, Spain. The institutions were chosen <strong>for</strong><br />

their mandate to provide open, distance and online<br />

programs and courses. However, data from two<br />

institutions from two different geographic locations<br />

with different histories allows us to consider<br />

adjustment to online learning without the bias <strong>of</strong><br />

culture or language. A convenience sample <strong>of</strong><br />

online instructors working at these institutions,<br />

with varying amounts <strong>of</strong> experience, across a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> subjects, was selected. Data collection<br />

stopped at thirty-nine (39) instructor interviews,<br />

twenty (20) from the institution in Canada and<br />

nineteen (19) from Spain, as it appeared no new<br />

insights were surfacing in the data.<br />

Instructors from three separate programs<br />

participated. One program is a social science<br />

Master’s Degree in Interdisciplinary Study.<br />

The two other programs are Master’s Degrees<br />

in Education with a concentration in Distance<br />

Education. Both programs are <strong>of</strong>fered entirely<br />

online on a learning plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> asynchronous<br />

communication. Courses ranged across multiple<br />

subject areas including philosophy, research methods<br />

and education technology. This variation <strong>of</strong><br />

course was included to randomize any possible<br />

subject-matter effects that may influence results.<br />

All courses were delivered using a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

print and electronic media and online conferencing.<br />

The online conferencing component provided<br />

the opportunity <strong>for</strong> student engagement and group<br />

interaction. Required conference participation<br />

was used <strong>for</strong> assessment in some courses while<br />

it remained a voluntary activity in others.<br />

Data Collection<br />

Three research assistants interviewed twenty-one<br />

Canadian instructors via telephone. As telephone<br />

interviews were inconvenient or unfeasible <strong>for</strong><br />

Catalonia instructors, this group <strong>of</strong> respondents<br />

completed online questionnaires. Eighteen University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Catalonia instructors participated in the<br />

survey. Questions posed to Catalonia instructors<br />

were conceptually similar, but not worded iden-<br />

172<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Learner in an Online Community <strong>of</strong> Inquiry<br />

tically to questions posed to Canadian instructors.<br />

Interviews divided randomly between three<br />

interviewers <strong>for</strong> Athabasca sample. Interview<br />

process used semi-structured approach in that<br />

questions were used as guidelines and probing<br />

was allowed. This let interviewees speak <strong>of</strong>f topic,<br />

going beyond the interview schedule at times. Interview<br />

data from OUC respondents was accepted<br />

at face value, as written by respondents.<br />

Questions focused on instructional elements <strong>of</strong><br />

design, facilitation and direct instruction as they<br />

relate to the three presences. References to student<br />

behaviour and adjustment to online environments<br />

were unintended findings that were analyzed as<br />

secondary findings.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Five themes, identified from the grounded theory<br />

work provided in previous studies <strong>of</strong> first-time online<br />

students (Cleveland-Innes, Garrison & Kinsel,<br />

20097). These themes are interaction, instructor<br />

role, self-identity, course design, and technology.<br />

Definitions <strong>of</strong> these constructs are outlined below.<br />

Interaction: Issues related to quality, quantity, and<br />

value <strong>of</strong> dialogue with other students and instructors.InstructorRole<br />

: Respondents commented on<br />

the activities <strong>of</strong> the instructor in the conference<br />

<strong>for</strong>ums and the quantity, quality and timing <strong>of</strong><br />

feedback.Self-identity: Respondents discussed<br />

learning style, personal needs, and increasing<br />

responsibility and ownership <strong>for</strong> learning.Design:<br />

Respondents commented on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

course design and delivery and the availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> institutional support.Technology: Respondents<br />

pointed out technology issues that may affect<br />

participation in an online community, and slow<br />

adjustment to the role <strong>of</strong> online learner.<br />

Identifiers were removed and interview transcripts<br />

saved <strong>based</strong> on a numerical scheme to<br />

retain confidentiality. Two interviewers imported<br />

transcripts to NVivo as rtf documents. A coding<br />

scheme was developed in NVivo <strong>based</strong> on a cod-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!