12.07.2015 Views

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

vault is one tough nut to crack open! I never was able, as a researcher, to get in to studythe written scores—though I tried repe<strong>at</strong>edly. I think Bill mentioned (in the FSM forum?)th<strong>at</strong> he would probably do some of the Alfred Hitchcock Hour episodes Herrmann did.Th<strong>at</strong>’s very nice, especially my pick of superb episodes/scores such as Nothing EverHappens in Linvale, Consider Her Ways, The Jar, A Home Away From Home, Change ofAddress, and maybe a few others. Some episodes I would not be too interested, includingThe Life & Work of Juan Diaz (a very tedious episode and score alike!). Definitely lowerdrawer or second tier score by Herrmann, rel<strong>at</strong>ively uninspired, a case of overexposure ofa motif! Where the Woodbine Twineth is also r<strong>at</strong>her inferior in comparison to all the rest.While Alfred Hitchcock has immedi<strong>at</strong>e n<strong>am</strong>e appeal, and a cd of the AHH scores wouldprobably sell well, I personally would take a risk and go for the more obscure (but overallmore interesting) scores for Revue-Universal. For ex<strong>am</strong>ple, I would record the“Nightmare” episode of the Bob Hope Chrysler The<strong>at</strong>er—wonderful score with lots ofmoody music! I would do a few Virginian episodes such as “Show Me A Hero” (11-17-65), “Nobility of Kings” (11-<strong>10</strong>-65), and “The Reckoning” (9-13-67).Of course I also discussed the CBS written scores of interest, which are indeed nowavailable to researchers and cd producers. But television m<strong>at</strong>erial is r<strong>at</strong>her iffy or takinga-chancein terms of making a profit, I suppose. Safer to stick to fe<strong>at</strong>ure films, especiallyof a high recognizable n<strong>am</strong>e. Although Alfred Hitchcock (as in the Alfred HitchcockHour) should see fairly well. But I never had luck getting into Universal to study thescores, despite repe<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>at</strong>tempts. I wonder if cd producers who put $$$$$$$ up frontwould have better luck?Thanks for your time.Talking Herrmann: Film Score Rundowns Upd<strong>at</strong>ed (Twilight Zone & Born Free)Reply by: Bill Wrobel ()______________________________________________________________________8-22-09:Not Hitch:I listened to th<strong>at</strong> YouTube selection. It started <strong>at</strong> about mid-point of the "A Tempo"section (the 2:25 point of my Radio Symphony Orchestra disc, or track # 4) so it was notorganized very precisely. Th<strong>at</strong> movement lasts 5:<strong>14</strong> in my cd. The Star Trek three-notestart theme you are referring to in the You Tube selection is actually from the "SubitoAllegro" section th<strong>at</strong> lasts about four minutes. In YouTube you hear th<strong>at</strong> three-note(actually six note for the actual Mahler piece--but the first three are reminiscent to you ofStar Trek) mini-phrase first <strong>at</strong> the 4:05 point, then 4:<strong>20</strong> point, then 4:32. On my cd it is1:40 then 1:58 then 2:<strong>10</strong>.The fact th<strong>at</strong> the horns play the motif and they both start as a three note initial theme(daaa-da-DAAAAAAAAAA) would n<strong>at</strong>urally kick in for most people the associ<strong>at</strong>iveprocess of similarity to the Star Trek theme (Courage) but it is simply a section of thelarger six-note musical thought form of Mahler's because he simply repe<strong>at</strong>s it <strong>at</strong> a higherpitch more or less, whereas the Courage theme is an 8 and then <strong>10</strong>-note structure--quite<strong>10</strong>6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!