12.07.2015 Views

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in the music, how it functions within the film and its structural implic<strong>at</strong>ions. Usingtranscriptions and portions of Herrmann’s original manuscript, this paper explores therhythmic and tonaltransform<strong>at</strong>ion of the Psycho Theme and illustr<strong>at</strong>es how the celebr<strong>at</strong>ed slasher themerel<strong>at</strong>es to it.The author asserts th<strong>at</strong> Norman’s B<strong>at</strong>es’ “mother” is represented by the concept of<strong>at</strong>onality (and not a theme) and explores the origins and dr<strong>am</strong><strong>at</strong>ic implic<strong>at</strong>ions of<strong>at</strong>onality in the second half of thefilm. The psychi<strong>at</strong>ric de<strong>at</strong>h of Norman B<strong>at</strong>es is rel<strong>at</strong>ed to them<strong>at</strong>ic transform<strong>at</strong>ion and<strong>at</strong>onality.Constructs borrowed from the fields of dr<strong>am</strong>a and acoustics provide a new context forunderstandinghow the timbre of Herrmann’s monochrom<strong>at</strong>ic string orchestra is appropri<strong>at</strong>e for thisfilm."Interesting assumptions. However, I wonder if Herrmann was ever asked about it??Wh<strong>at</strong> did HE intend?? Wh<strong>at</strong> Husarik, Fred Steiner, Brown, Wrobel (etc.) may read into aHerrmann score may not necessarily be wh<strong>at</strong> Herrmann actually envisioned.... Perhaps hesimply thought, "Well, Norman B<strong>at</strong>es is a looney tune (and a very dangerous one), solet's musically characterize th<strong>at</strong> with <strong>at</strong>onal music (crazy music!)".....!!!___________________________________________________________________________________________________________talkingherrmann mailing list************************************1-7-<strong>10</strong>:Bombay Mail by Roemheld on YouTube:http://www.youtube.com/w<strong>at</strong>ch?v=1pdDeQ3UL_MTalking Herrmann: Roemheld as Herrmann Precursor?Reply by: Bill Wrobel ()______________________________________________________________________I <strong>am</strong> no expert on Roemheld and have seen (or r<strong>at</strong>her, heard) rel<strong>at</strong>ively few of his movies,but based on wh<strong>at</strong> I heard on Bombay Mail in th<strong>at</strong> YouTube clip, I hear far more MaxSteiner than I do Bernard Herrmann. At the 00:18 point, Roemheld really musicallymimics train effects with the rhythmic p<strong>at</strong>terns and the high tooting of the trumpets as theaudience w<strong>at</strong>ches the approaching train. Herrmann wouldn't do th<strong>at</strong>--or <strong>at</strong> least soobviously in th<strong>at</strong> "mickey-mousing" manner th<strong>at</strong> Steiner was adept <strong>at</strong>. Then <strong>at</strong> the 00:33point he plays the r<strong>at</strong>her Green Hornet rapid run figures (again <strong>at</strong> 00:56). True, <strong>at</strong> the01:09 point in the teletape sequence, we hear the r<strong>at</strong>her Herrmannesque ominous lowwoodwinds th<strong>at</strong> is effective. At 03:43 we hear the stopped horns as the priv<strong>at</strong>e secretary192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!