12.07.2015 Views

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

Valentine's Day, Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 10:20 am

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

{Image http://img<strong>10</strong>9.imageshack.us/img<strong>10</strong>9/4343/img0013dk.jpg{Image http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/7481/img00<strong>14</strong>eq.jpghttp://img<strong>10</strong>9.imageshack.us/img<strong>10</strong>9/4343/img0013dk.jpghttp://img686.imageshack.us/img686/7481/img00<strong>14</strong>eq.jpgAbove are the top and bottom halves of my own hand-copied version of the beginningof the Main Title meant for personal research study. You can see th<strong>at</strong> Smith used a prettyconventional orchestra. Herrmann, on the other hand, would predictably use a fairlyunconventional orchestra in terms of augmented instrument<strong>at</strong>ion of certain instrumentalchoirs. Herrmann would certainly use more than one harp, unlike Smith. He would alsouse instrument<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> would signify (to him) a liquid sensibility to the score, and ofcourse "deepness" especially when the Nautilus is very deep underw<strong>at</strong>er. I think he wouldhave augmented the brass section for sure. He would've come up with an instrument(s)th<strong>at</strong> would have a special significance for the n<strong>at</strong>ure of the film (just as he did with theSerpent woodwind for JTTCOTE). His probable score would also not be as light orcomical as Smith's score, de-emphasizing the Whale of a Tale melody! Of course MaxSteiner would ,like Smith, emphasize it up to the mast!Time for bed._______________________________________________talkingherrmann mailing list***********************12-29-09:Talking Herrmann: <strong>20</strong>,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Was Herrmann Considered byDisney?Reply by: Bill Wrobel ()______________________________________________________________________It's not all th<strong>at</strong> risky to intelligently predict wh<strong>at</strong> an established composer would'vedone. After all, much of wh<strong>at</strong> a composer does in his busy career is habitual, and itshows in his scores if you are fortun<strong>at</strong>e enough to be able to study most of them (as in thecase of Herrmann). First you get to know the general approach of a composer. In MaxSteiner's case, we all know his approach: leitmotifs for the major characters, "mickeymousing"actions, and so forth. I had already discussed Herrmann's approach in myonline essay on the m<strong>at</strong>ter. You cannot of course always specify the precise details ofhow Herrmann would implement his generalized style/ The theme can be expressed inany of many details in terms of choices of instruments, for instance, but one can makeeduc<strong>at</strong>ed guesses if one studies Herrmann's scores long enough so th<strong>at</strong> you get into thesubjective "feel" or world view of his approach. A composer may cre<strong>at</strong>ively change astandard approach for the sake of the film's subject m<strong>at</strong>ter. Jerry Goldsmith, for ex<strong>am</strong>ple,184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!