12.07.2015 Views

The Army Training System - AskTOP

The Army Training System - AskTOP

The Army Training System - AskTOP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FM 100-14Hazards are sources of danger or risks due to enemy or adversarypresence and other conditions not due to enemy or adversarycapabilities. Hazards are found in all operational environments.Combat operations, stability operations, base support operations, andtraining present unique hazards for units involved in these kinds ofmissions. Hazards are identified during the first four steps of themilitary decision-making process: mission receipt, mission analysis, COAdevelopment, and COA analysis.<strong>The</strong> ability of unit leaders and staffs to identify hazards is key. Onereality of today’s missions is that the aspect of a hazard can changerapidly. Things of little risk initially can quickly become major threatsdue to unforeseen natural or man-made events. Leaders should beaware of this possibility. Complacency to the fact that existing controlsmay not continue to control hazards in rapidly changing situationsshould be viewed as a hazard in itself.<strong>The</strong> factors of METT-T provide a sound framework for identifyinghazards when planning, preparing, and executing operations. Whenapplying risk management to METT-T during mission analysis,leaders and staffs should look for hazards that affect both tactical andaccident risks. <strong>The</strong>y must identify all hazards that may presentsignificant risks to the mission.MissionLeaders first analyze the assigned mission. <strong>The</strong>y look at the typeof mission to be accomplished and consider possible subsequentmissions. Certain kinds of operations are inherently more dangerousthan others. For example, a deliberate frontal attack, because of theassociated movement, is more likely to expose a unit to losses thanwould a defense from prepared positions. Identifying missions thatroutinely present great risk is imperative. Leaders also look forhazards associated with complexity of the plan such as—• A scheme of maneuver that is difficult to understand or toocomplex for accurate communications down to the lowest level.• <strong>The</strong> impact of operating under a fragmentary order (FRAGO).EnemyCommanders look for enemy capabilities that pose significanthazards to the operation. For example, “What can the enemy do to2-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!