12.07.2015 Views

Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia

Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia

Managing Politics and Islam in Indonesia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MANAGING POLITICS AND ISLAM IN INDONESIA 25Emmerson illustrates how the M<strong>in</strong>ister of Internal Affairs, Amir Machmud(also a military general) implemented the Golkar strategy, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> hisown department, as part of a broader effort to elim<strong>in</strong>ate party <strong>in</strong>fluence from thegovernment bureaucracy. The aim was to create a new cadre of de-politicised civilservants <strong>and</strong> to imbue them with <strong>in</strong>ternal discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> undivided loyalty to acentralised cha<strong>in</strong> of comm<strong>and</strong>, presided over by President Suharto (the supremecomm<strong>and</strong>er of the armed forces). In l<strong>in</strong>e with the Golkar strategy, Machmudrequired staff at the M<strong>in</strong>istry to jo<strong>in</strong> a Corps of Functionaries for the M<strong>in</strong>istry(Korps Karyawan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Kokarmendagri), or face the threat ofdismissal. 10Dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1971 election campaign, Ali Murtopo organised rival KorpsKaryawan (Kokar) <strong>in</strong> governmental departments, m<strong>in</strong>istries <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong>,after the election, they were fused <strong>in</strong>to a s<strong>in</strong>gle organisation, the Corps of CivilServants of the Republic of <strong>Indonesia</strong>, Korpri. Machmud issued GovernmentalRegulation (PP No.6/1970), requir<strong>in</strong>g civil servants to swear their sole allegiance(‘mono-loyalty’) to the government <strong>and</strong> cut their ties with the political parties. Inpractice, at general elections, civil servants were organised <strong>in</strong>to vot<strong>in</strong>g forGolkar, <strong>and</strong> faced dismissal if they refused to comply. 11The Korpri strategy underm<strong>in</strong>ed the strength of some of the political parties<strong>and</strong> the trade unions, by depriv<strong>in</strong>g them of substantial bases of support. Forexample, the <strong>Indonesia</strong>n National Party (PNI) had drawn much of its supportfrom the bureaucracy, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Islam</strong>ic party, Nahdlatul Ulama (Awaken<strong>in</strong>g ofReligious Scholars), had entrenched itself <strong>in</strong> the Department of Religion. Underthe new provisions, <strong>in</strong>dependent trade unions also were refused access to Korprimembers, <strong>and</strong> therefore were greatly weakened. In reality, however, state leaderswere unable to enforce rigidly mono-loyalty provisions, as some governmentemployees (especially from the Department of Religion) cont<strong>in</strong>ued to vote forthe parties. 12The Korpri <strong>in</strong>itiative was part of a wider strategy of the ‘Big Golkar Family(Golkar, Korpri, <strong>and</strong> ABRI)’, to enable the military <strong>and</strong> the bureaucracy topenetrate all levels of <strong>Indonesia</strong>n society from the national level downward to theprov<strong>in</strong>ce, district, sub-district <strong>and</strong> village levels. This co<strong>in</strong>cided with greatermilitary <strong>in</strong>trusion <strong>in</strong>to the government bureaucracy, with military officershold<strong>in</strong>g civilian office as governors, <strong>and</strong> district heads. These officials werecharged with br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g about a Golkar victory at local <strong>and</strong> national elections.Before the 1982 election, village chiefs became Korpri members under a newregulation, which effectively l<strong>in</strong>ked village headmen to the national government<strong>and</strong> helped facilitate the mobilisation of rural populations beh<strong>in</strong>d Golkar. 13Complement<strong>in</strong>g this militarisation <strong>and</strong> Golkarisation of state <strong>and</strong> society, wasthe <strong>in</strong>troduction of the ‘float<strong>in</strong>g mass’ concept <strong>in</strong> 1971, whereby the politicalparties were denied access to their traditional constituencies below the districtlevel. Golkar established non-party functional <strong>and</strong> professional organisationswith which to re-channel the <strong>in</strong>terests of the rural population. Between 1973 <strong>and</strong>1974, the government required various professional <strong>and</strong> community

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!