13.07.2015 Views

MAINTAINABILITY DESIGN TECHNIQUES METRIC - AcqNotes.com

MAINTAINABILITY DESIGN TECHNIQUES METRIC - AcqNotes.com

MAINTAINABILITY DESIGN TECHNIQUES METRIC - AcqNotes.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.<strong>com</strong> on 2011-10-29T14:56:01.DOD-HDBK-791(AM)MTBDE = mean time between downtime events, hMTTRS = mean time to restore system, h.In Eq. 8-2, MTBDE includes both preventive and correctivemaintenance; similarly, MTTRS includes downtimefor both preventive and corrective maintenance.It is evident from Eq. 8-1 that an increase in operatingtime OT for the same total maintenance downtime willresult in a greater availability A a1. Similarly from Eq. 8-2,a higher MTBDE for the same MTTRS will result ingreater availability A a2. Likewise, a lower TPM (Eq. 8-l)or MTTRS (Eq. 8-2) will result in an increased availability.The trade-off decisions involve both the determinationof the most cost-effective method for achieving animprovement in reliability (MTBDE) or maintainability(MTTRS) and the determination of the cost-effectiveness.or value, of the resulting improvement in terms of theincreased life of the equipment.The value of increased availability must be determinedon the basis of the planned use of each type of equipment.In simplest terms. increased availability can be equated tofewer required items. For example. if a requirement forhelicopters stated that 200 helicopters are required and anexpected availability prediction was 80%, it would beexpected that only 160 helicopters would be available foruse at any given time. Therefore, to be reasonably certainof having 200 helicopters in an operational state, 250helicopters would have to be procured. In this example a10% improvement in availability, i.e., 90%, would reducethe required procurement to 222 or by a value equal to theacquisition cost of 28 helicopters plus their operating andsupport costs.8-3.2 COST OF OWNERSHIPPreventive maintenance versus repairing after conditionmonitoring is one of the major trade-offs for determiningwhen to perform preventive maintenance. Theadvantage of scheduled, on-condition maintenance is thatdamage would be detected when the equipment is alreadyout of service and in a condition to permit the repair to bemade. If the unserviceability occurs at a random time, thecost of repair must include the cost of providing therequired maintenance capability—e. g., travel time of personnel,towing cost, and travel costs as well as the costrelated to the unavailability of the equipment.The value of performing preventive maintenance on anitem in lieu of allowing the item to operate without maintenanceuntil failure can be measured in terms of relativecost. The performance of preventive maintenance is costeffectiveif the reduction in repair cost plus the equipmentout-of-service cost exceeds the accrued preventive maintenancecost. The following equations illustrate thishypothesis:From the standpoint of dollars only, Eq. 8-3 indicatesthat for a positive value of V pmi.e., C pm> C cm, it is betterto adopt a policy of no preventive maintenance: a negativevalue of V pm, i.e., C pm< C cm, indicates preventivemaintenance is the better policy. Cost considerations,however. cannot be considered in isolation. Consider a8-6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!