13.07.2015 Views

Testimonies for the Church Volume 1 - A New You Ministry

Testimonies for the Church Volume 1 - A New You Ministry

Testimonies for the Church Volume 1 - A New You Ministry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eport of what was said and done in relation to Sister More was given by my husbandin <strong>the</strong> Review <strong>for</strong> February 18, 1868, as follows:“At this meeting we introduced <strong>the</strong> case of Sister Hannah More, now sojourning innorthwestern Michigan with friends who do not observe <strong>the</strong> Bible Sabbath. We statedthat this servant of Christ embraced <strong>the</strong> Sabbath while per<strong>for</strong>ming missionary labor inCentral Africa. When this was known, her services in that direction were no longerwanted, and she returned to America to seek a home and employment with those oflike faith. We judge, from her present location, that in this she has been disappointed.No one in particular may be worthy of blame in her case; but it appears to us that<strong>the</strong>re is ei<strong>the</strong>r a lack of suitable provisions connected with our system of organization,<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> encouragement of such persons and to assist <strong>the</strong>m to a field of useful labor, orthat those brethren and sisters who have had <strong>the</strong> pleasure of seeing Sister More havenot done <strong>the</strong>ir duty. A unanimous vote was <strong>the</strong>n given to invite her to find a homewith <strong>the</strong> brethren in this vicinity until General Conference, when her case should bepresented to our people. Bro<strong>the</strong>r Andrews, being present, fully endorsed <strong>the</strong> action of<strong>the</strong> brethren.”From what we have since learned of <strong>the</strong> cold, indifferent treatment which SisterMore met with at Battle Creek, it is evident that in stating that no one in particular wasworthy of censure in her case, my husband took altoge<strong>the</strong>r a too charitable view of <strong>the</strong>matter. When all <strong>the</strong> facts are known, no Christian could but blame all members of thatchurch who knew her circumstances and did not individually interest <strong>the</strong>mselves in herbehalf. It certainly was <strong>the</strong> duty of <strong>the</strong> officers to do this and report to <strong>the</strong> church, ifo<strong>the</strong>rs did not take up <strong>the</strong> matter be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong>m. But individual members of that or anyo<strong>the</strong>r church should not feel excused from taking an interest in such persons. Afterwhat has been said in <strong>the</strong>669

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!