05.12.2012 Views

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Quasi-Harmonic Quadrature CMOS Relaxation Oscillator<br />

J. Chabloz, D. Ruffieux<br />

In this paper, a solution to realize a local oscillator (LO) for a low power super-heterodyne receiver is presented. The complete local frequency<br />

synthesis solution comprises a fixed-frequency bulk-acoustic wave (BAW) RF oscillator with low phase noise and low tun<strong>in</strong>g range.<br />

A quasi-harmonic quadrature relaxation oscillator with a large tun<strong>in</strong>g range is realized and can be used to compensate for variations <strong>in</strong> the<br />

RF oscillator as well as to cover the entire bandwidth for multiple channel selection.<br />

The receiver for which the presented oscillator is specifically<br />

designed is based on a super-heterodyne architecture and its<br />

block schematic is described <strong>in</strong> Figure 1. The receiver frontend<br />

and baseband parts have already been <strong>in</strong>tegrated and<br />

characterized with external oscillators [1] . A BAW oscillator<br />

embedded with<strong>in</strong> a digital frequency synthesis [2] is used as a<br />

first local source (BAW RF LO) and runs at a fixed frequency,<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the physical dimensions of the BAW resonator.<br />

The second downconversion uses a quadrature relaxation<br />

oscillator (IF LO) with a large tun<strong>in</strong>g range [3] that is presented<br />

below.<br />

28<br />

Passband<br />

Balun<br />

BAW<br />

Filter<br />

2400.0 - 2483.5 MHz<br />

On-chip<br />

LNA<br />

2330.0 MHz<br />

fixed<br />

BAW<br />

LO<br />

IF Amplifier<br />

Quadrature<br />

IF Oscill.<br />

Frequency Synthesis<br />

Figure 1: Super-heterodyne receiver architecture<br />

70.0 - 153.5 MHz<br />

tunable<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the second downconversion is direct, the selected<br />

channel frequency is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the sum or the difference<br />

of both oscillator frequencies. Therefore the allowed frequency<br />

excursion on the second oscillator allows to compensate<br />

entirely for the lack of tunability of the first one.<br />

The proposed quasi-harmonic quadrature relaxation oscillator<br />

architecture is described <strong>in</strong> Figure 2. Coupl<strong>in</strong>g transistors are<br />

used to couple two classical relaxation oscillator cores.<br />

Coupl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transistors<br />

M3<br />

M1<br />

M2<br />

Figure 2: Quadrature oscillator architecture<br />

The wide variation of bias current needed to tune the<br />

oscillation frequency over the required range also creates<br />

wide variations <strong>in</strong> the oscillator operat<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t, more<br />

specifically <strong>in</strong> the steady-state oscillation amplitude. In order<br />

to <strong>in</strong>crease the tun<strong>in</strong>g range, l<strong>in</strong>earize the current-to-frequency<br />

characteristic and allow the oscillator to stay <strong>in</strong> the quasiharmonic<br />

mode over the entire range, an amplitude control<br />

has been designed.<br />

The presented circuit has been fabricated <strong>in</strong> a standard<br />

0.18 µm CMOS process. Figure 3 shows the actual receiver<br />

test chip photograph. The BAW resonator is bonded together<br />

with the chip.<br />

Figure 3: Receiver test chip photograph<br />

The oscillation frequency has been measured with different<br />

amplitude sett<strong>in</strong>gs and the results are shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4. It<br />

can be seen that the tun<strong>in</strong>g range covers the wanted<br />

frequencies which range from 70 MHz to 150 MHz.<br />

Oscillation frequency [MHz]<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60 0<br />

120<br />

140<br />

1<br />

160<br />

2<br />

180<br />

3<br />

200<br />

Relaxation oscillator current consumption (wo buffer) [μA]<br />

4<br />

220<br />

5<br />

240<br />

6<br />

K = 1.35<br />

K = 1.2<br />

Figure 4: Measured oscillator frequency tun<strong>in</strong>g range with two<br />

different amplitude sett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

The quadrature coupl<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is verified by measur<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

average phase difference of 89° between the I and Q signals.<br />

Spot phase noises of -104 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset and<br />

-111 dBc/Hz at 3 MHz offset have been measured.<br />

[1] J. Chabloz, et al., “A Low-Power 2.4GHz CMOS Front-End us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

BAW Resonators”, ISSCC’06 proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 1244-1253<br />

[2] D. Ruffieux, et al., “An Agile 2.4GHz MEMS-Based Digital<br />

Frequency Synthesizer”, <strong>CSEM</strong> Scientific and Technical Report<br />

2006, page 24<br />

[3] J. Chabloz, et al., “Frequency Synthesis for a Low-Power<br />

2.4GHz Receiver us<strong>in</strong>g a BAW Oscillator and a Relaxation<br />

Oscillator”, ESSCIRC’07 proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, 492-495<br />

260<br />

7<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!