05.12.2012 Views

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FM-UWB – A Low Data Rate (LDR) UWB Approach with Short Synchronization Time and<br />

Robustness to Interference and Frequency-Selective Multipath<br />

J. F. M. Gerrits, J. R. Farserotu, M. Hübner, J. Ayadi<br />

Constant-envelope FM-UWB is a true LDR (< 100 kbit/s) UWB system. Instantaneous despread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the receiver allows for rapid synchronization.<br />

The robustness to <strong>in</strong>terference and frequency-selective multipath make this system a good choice for robust LDR Body Area Network systems.<br />

Ultra Wideband (UWB) communications are poised to enable<br />

short-range applications, such as remote health monitor<strong>in</strong>g (ehealth)<br />

and home or office automation.<br />

Body Area Networks (BANs) [1] are potential candidates for<br />

UWB s<strong>in</strong>ce the low radiated power of the UWB transmitter<br />

enables low DC power consumption yield<strong>in</strong>g long battery life<br />

and the possibility to use energy scaveng<strong>in</strong>g. Size and cost<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts require a low-complexity approach that allows<br />

multiple users shar<strong>in</strong>g the same RF bandwidth, and offers<br />

robustness to <strong>in</strong>terference and frequency-selective multipath<br />

propagation conditions.<br />

Constant-envelope FM-UWB uses double FM: b<strong>in</strong>ary FSK<br />

followed by high modulation <strong>in</strong>dex analog FM implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

analog spread<strong>in</strong>g. The FM-UWB signal is characterized by a<br />

flat spectrum and steep spectral roll-off.<br />

Due to the <strong>in</strong>stantaneous despread<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the receiver,<br />

synchronization time is limited only by the bit synchronizer <strong>in</strong><br />

the FSK demodulator. Figure 1 shows measurement results<br />

taken <strong>in</strong> a 62.5 kbps FM-UWB system operat<strong>in</strong>g at 4 GHz.<br />

Transmission starts at the ris<strong>in</strong>g edge of the TX_ENABLE<br />

signal. On the receiver side, the raw data RXD is available<br />

almost <strong>in</strong>stantaneously, whereas the bit synchronizer circuit<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>es the overall receiver synchronization time. From a<br />

synchronization po<strong>in</strong>t of view, the FM-UWB system behaves<br />

like a narrowband FSK system.<br />

Figure 1: Measured FM-UWB receiver synchronization time.<br />

Interference from <strong>in</strong>-band UWB users benefits from the<br />

receiver process<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong> which is equal to the ratio of RF and<br />

subcarrier bandwidth<br />

G<br />

PdB<br />

= 10 log<br />

10<br />

⎛ B<br />

⎜<br />

⎝ B<br />

RF<br />

SUB<br />

⎞<br />

⎟<br />

= 10 log<br />

⎠<br />

10<br />

⎛<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

2Δf<br />

⎞<br />

( ) ⎟ RF<br />

β + 1 R<br />

SUB<br />

In a 100 kbit/s LDR system with a RF bandwidth of 500 MHz a<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g ga<strong>in</strong> of 34 dB is obta<strong>in</strong>ed. As a result a 100 kbps<br />

FM-UWB radio can tolerate a 21 dB stronger FM-UWB<br />

<strong>in</strong>terferer. Simulations have confirmed these values and also<br />

⎠<br />

show that Impulse Radio and MBOFDM <strong>in</strong>terference up to<br />

15 dB stronger than the FM-UWB signal can be dealt with.<br />

FM-UWB signals are robust to frequency-selective<br />

multipath [2] . Figure 2 shows MATLAB simulation results of the<br />

RF sensitivity improvement for 1000 realizations of the IEEE<br />

CM4 (strong non l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight) channel. The graph <strong>in</strong> the<br />

upper part of the figure shows the RF sensitivity improvement<br />

for each channel realization. The histogram <strong>in</strong> the lower part<br />

of the figure shows the distribution of the receiver sensitivity<br />

improvement. The average and median value both equal 0 dB<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g that 50% of the strong non l<strong>in</strong>e-of-sight channels<br />

yield a performance improvement. The worst-case sensitivity<br />

degradation is only 2.5 dB.<br />

Straightforward by its pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, FM-UWB constitutes a LDR<br />

UWB communication system highly robust to <strong>in</strong>terferences<br />

and multipath.<br />

Figure 2: Sensitivity improvement <strong>in</strong> CM4 channel.<br />

[1] J. F. M. Gerrits, J. R. Farserotu, "FM-UWB: A Low Complexity<br />

Constant Envelope LDR UWB Communication System", IEEE<br />

P802.15 Work<strong>in</strong>g Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks<br />

(WPANs), July <strong>2007</strong>, San Francisco, California, USA,<br />

IEEE802.15-07-0778-040ban,<br />

http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/Sgmban.htm<br />

[2] J. F. M. Gerrits, J. R. Farserotu, J.R. Long, "Multipath Behavior<br />

of FM-UWB Signals", Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of ICUWB<strong>2007</strong>, S<strong>in</strong>gapore,<br />

September <strong>2007</strong><br />

http://www.wise-project.org/<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!