05.12.2012 Views

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

research activities in 2007 - CSEM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Composite Materials for Bone Implants<br />

M. Giazzon, M. Liley, G. Weder<br />

<strong>CSEM</strong> is develop<strong>in</strong>g methods to nanostructure (‘texture’) composite materials for use <strong>in</strong> orthopaedic implants. Photolithography and bead<br />

lithography methods are used to create master templates that are then replicated <strong>in</strong> a res<strong>in</strong> matrix. The structures will be tested for their effect on<br />

bone cells <strong>in</strong> vitro.<br />

The use of orthopaedic surgery to replace jo<strong>in</strong>ts and repair<br />

bone defects is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rapidly. Due to a more active ag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

population, the demands made on the materials used <strong>in</strong> these<br />

operations are also <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g: improved robustness, longer<br />

lifetimes and easier surgical procedures are expected for hip<br />

implants and other jo<strong>in</strong>t replacements.<br />

Metals have been used with enormous success <strong>in</strong> orthopaedic<br />

surgery, but there are still some problems associated with<br />

their use. While issues such as weight and thermal<br />

conductivity can be important for specific applications such as<br />

cranial repair, one major issue of almost universal importance<br />

is that of Young’s modulus. The high stiffness of metallic<br />

implants results <strong>in</strong> a mismatch <strong>in</strong> its mechanical properties<br />

and surround<strong>in</strong>g bone. This <strong>in</strong> turn leads to “stress shield<strong>in</strong>g”:<br />

loss of bone mass and weaken<strong>in</strong>g of the surround<strong>in</strong>g bone<br />

that may lead to implant failure. In this context, the repair of<br />

osteoporotic bone rema<strong>in</strong>s a major challenge.<br />

As a partner <strong>in</strong> the EU project Newbone, <strong>CSEM</strong> is work<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

develop composite materials that can be used <strong>in</strong> orthopaedic<br />

surgery. Glass-fibre re<strong>in</strong>forced composites (FRCs) based on<br />

polymeric materials currently used <strong>in</strong> dentistry are be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tested and optimised for applications <strong>in</strong> bone repair. <strong>CSEM</strong>’s<br />

contribution is to test the effect of surface coat<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

modification, with the goal of develop<strong>in</strong>g surface micro- and<br />

nanostructures that enhance cell growth, cell adhesion and<br />

the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the implant <strong>in</strong>to the surround<strong>in</strong>g bone.<br />

Figure 1: Hemispherical pits fabricated by replication <strong>in</strong> a bis-<br />

GMA/TEGDMA res<strong>in</strong> matrix<br />

The micro- and nanostructures are fabricated <strong>in</strong> the surface of<br />

the res<strong>in</strong> composite matrix by replication. The orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

(“master”) structures are made by photolithography, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

case of microstructures (Figure 1), and bead lithography for<br />

the nanostructures (Figure 2). In a first stage, the two types of<br />

structures will be tested separately for their effect on cultured<br />

bone cell l<strong>in</strong>es. Previous studies on dental implants have<br />

shown that multi-length scale topographies give the best bone<br />

60<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration. So, comb<strong>in</strong>ations of the <strong>in</strong>dividual structures that<br />

give the best results will also be tested.<br />

Figure 2: Pillar structures <strong>in</strong> a silicon master<br />

<strong>CSEM</strong> is also develop<strong>in</strong>g methods to determ<strong>in</strong>e the reaction<br />

of bone cells to structured surfaces. In addition to previously<br />

reported new methods to directly measure cell adhesion are<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigated. One of the most promis<strong>in</strong>g of these<br />

methods uses a specially adapted atomic force microscope<br />

(AFM) to measure the force necessary to pull <strong>in</strong>dividual cells<br />

from the surface (see Figure 3).<br />

Figure 3: Direct measurement of cell adhesion: a) A cell attached to<br />

an AFM cantilever is brought towards the surface. b) The cell<br />

contacts the surface. c) The cell is pulled away from the surface. The<br />

deflection of the cantilever is measured to determ<strong>in</strong>e the force<br />

applied to the cell. d) The cell is released from the surface.<br />

Initial results with this technique are promis<strong>in</strong>g, and it is hoped<br />

that it will give new <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>in</strong>fluence of surface<br />

modification on the <strong>in</strong>teractions between bone cells and<br />

surfaces.<br />

This work was partially f<strong>in</strong>anced by the European Commission<br />

<strong>in</strong> the context of the Project Newbone (NMP3-CT-<strong>2007</strong>-<br />

026279). <strong>CSEM</strong> thanks them for their support.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!