e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

Figure 4.17. E-government leadership challenges within organisations selected as “important” or
“very important” by ministries and agencies
Linking e-government activities to the general development, planning
and implementation of other activities in their organisation
Unclear responsibilities with regard to development, planning and
implementation of e-government within their own organisation
Lack of procedure for identifying best practices
Lack of risk assessment activities
lack of leadership involvement/support for e-government activities
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
106
Agency Ministry
292. Figure 27 and figure 28 suggest that organisations with an e-government plan or with advanced
electronic service delivery more often delegate the responsibility for producing an e-government plan to
the ICT unit of the organisation or to several units working across the organisation than organisations
without an e-government plan or very advanced electronic service delivery. In line with this, the figures
furthermore suggest that organisations with an e-government plan and/or which are advanced in their
delivery of electronic services are less likely to give the responsibility for developing an e-government plan
to the head of the organisation than those that lack a plan or advanced electronic services.
Figure 4.18. Main responsibility for producing an e-government plan (advanced vs non advanced
organisations)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Source: OECD
Source: OECD
advanced non advanced
Responsibility of Head Responsibility of ICT Unit Responsibility of several unit across organisations