e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure4.23. Main responsibility for producing e-government plan: lack of inter-agency collaboration<br />
group working across several unit<br />
in the organisation<br />
group working across several<br />
levels of government<br />
group working across several<br />
ministries/central agencies<br />
Source: OECD<br />
unit dealing with IT and<br />
telecommunications<br />
unit dealing with media,<br />
communication, etc.<br />
head of organisation<br />
administration unit<br />
external consultants<br />
financial unit<br />
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%<br />
321. Ministries and agencies that reported providing advanced services stressed that to move ahead<br />
with cross-administration projects, co-ordination and planning to facilitate co-operation are needed within<br />
each administrative field at the central level and across the central government. They also raised the lack of<br />
co-operation with autonomous bodies such as KELA, whose work is closely tied to that of the central<br />
administration, as a barrier to developing joint projects. The Ministry of Labour noted, for example, that<br />
80% of the benefits administered by KELA are paid for by the central administration, which also<br />
determines eligibility.<br />
322. Most shared services seem to be taking place when a local constituency provides a focal point for<br />
service provision. Identifying specific electronic service clusters and projects at a central level could<br />
facilitate co-operation by requiring top management in the organisations concerned to set responsibility<br />
and accountability frameworks. This would provide a clear mandate for lower-level managers to<br />
participate in interagency co-operation, while ensuring that the initiative at the top management level is<br />
consistent with the needs identified within the organisation.<br />
323. The Programme of Action suggests specific measures to strengthen joint service capabilities,<br />
take advantage of base registers and promote data sharing. These measures will be useful enablers of<br />
electronic service clusters and cross-administration e-government projects but may not be sufficient, in<br />
themselves, to initiate the planning of such projects. It would probably be valuable if one of the central<br />
ministries or boards took responsibility for identifying specific areas in which there is a need for planning<br />
service clusters and cross-administration projects in light of organisation-specific strategies and the<br />
existing formal and informal cross-administration networks.<br />
324. The 2001 Programme of Action to Promote Online Government also recommends that a national,<br />
seamless and client-oriented model of online social and health services should be created with the co-<br />
115