07.12.2012 Views

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

328. When asked whether or not e-government has had an impact on administration structures<br />

(including general organisation, hierarchy or reduction in personnel – see also Figure 21), partnerships for<br />

public-private service delivery was the structural factor most frequently cited (64%). It is worth noting that<br />

less than 20% of respondents felt that e-government activities had a significant impact on any structural<br />

elements.<br />

Public-private partnerships<br />

329. The need to find alternative ways to finance e-government projects and to share risk is probably<br />

two of the most important factors driving the development of e-government partnerships with the private<br />

sector. In the TYVI project, for example, the objective was to develop a system that would be selfsustainable<br />

in the long term (see Part 7.1). It is based on interaction between enterprises, data-collecting<br />

companies (TYVI brokers) and administrative agencies/data users: firms send their information only once<br />

over the Internet directly to a broker, which then forwards it to the appropriate authority or authorities. An<br />

official from the Confederation of Finnish Industry and Employers pointed to the role of the private sector<br />

in enhancing the development of e-government as a way to create an environment that suits enterprises’<br />

needs and to improve public sector productivity.<br />

330. The TYVI project has had the additional benefit of generating commercial activity through the<br />

value-added exploitation of public data. While the TYVI brokers collect payment from the agencies that<br />

use their data, in fact, most of their revenue come from additional services that they provide to reporting<br />

companies (e.g. formatting raw data, providing different types of data reports).<br />

331. In the case of the JULHA directory (see Box 3.1, part 3.2.3), the lack of start-up funds was made<br />

up for by the willingness of a few key agencies to pay higher fees at the outset to have their information<br />

listed in this government-wide directory. As additional agencies joined the project, the private-sector<br />

contractor running the service was able to lower the fee and now has a sustainable revenue stream.<br />

332. Public-private partnerships in Finland are not solely commercial in nature. They also tie into the<br />

shared vision of developing an information society and commonly shared values of openness and<br />

stakeholder consultation. As argued in Chapter 3, the development of the information society commonly<br />

creates expectations among citizens and these will have an impact on the take-up of e-government and<br />

online services. This is the one of the reasons why the Information Society Advisory Board (ISAB), with<br />

high-level public- and private-sector representatives, has played such an important role in developing an egovernment<br />

vision for Finland.<br />

333. Problems regarding the setting of standards and the assuming of technological and market risk<br />

can complicate the relationship between the public and private sector. In addition, the government’s<br />

service commitment to close the digital divide will also necessarily mean that its orientation will be<br />

somewhat different from that of the private sector. By initially attempting to “go it alone”, the F<strong>IN</strong>EID<br />

card (see Box 3.2 and Part 6.2) demonstrates that co-operation between public authorities and private<br />

businesses is not always simple. In the end, however, the lesson has been useful. The MoI’s current efforts<br />

to increase co-operation with private sector partners demonstrates an understanding that developing a<br />

shared customer base benefits all parties.<br />

334. There is still much room for partnerships in areas of overlap between the two sectors, such as<br />

authentication and information services. Finland’s admirable ICT infrastructure, both private (i.e.<br />

broadband and mobile networks) and public (i.e. public access points, personal register system, PKI<br />

framework) can converge to add value and avoid duplication, for example, by developing synergy with the<br />

banking sector for authentication and payment services. Another potential area for partnerships is the<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!