e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
E-Government in Finland : Proposals for Action<br />
1. In order to increase awareness of the e-government vision throughout the administration, the<br />
government could better market its vision through a communications project aimed at front-line staff,<br />
IT officials, top management and ministers, and the general population:<br />
1.a Ministries and agencies could be encouraged to begin thinking about what action is needed to<br />
change the structures, processes and culture of the administration through inter-agency<br />
discussions involving broad cross-sections of staff on how e-government can improve public<br />
governance. Additional consultation of staff could also improve the quality and ownership of<br />
the e-government vision.<br />
1.b The vision could be incorporated more explicitly into technical training and assistance for the<br />
preparation of agency e-government plans.<br />
1.c A communications strategy could be used to inform citizens and businesses of the objectives,<br />
actual and potential benefits, and progress of the overall e-government initiative.<br />
2. In order to better promote user-centric electronic services, the government could examine how it<br />
can better understand user preferences. Actions could include requiring agencies to report existing<br />
information on customer needs, making better use of survey and statistical information, and<br />
aggregating all existing information to present a clearer overall picture.<br />
3. In order to ensure ownership of the e-government initiative and to provide clear guidance and<br />
leadership, it would be beneficial for the Ministry of Finance (MoF) to continue to develop its current<br />
co-ordination activities as the designated primary co-ordinator for e-government in the central<br />
administration. In particular, as the co-ordinator for agency and ministry e-government plans, MoF<br />
could:<br />
3.a further promote action and a whole-of-government perspective by taking an active role in<br />
supporting, reviewing, co-ordinating and monitoring plans in order to ensure that they are<br />
realistic, integrated with overall agency planning and consistent with the overall egovernment<br />
vision and objectives.<br />
3.b review e-government plans for inter-agency collaboration, including requiring ministries and<br />
agencies to identify natural partners and to consult with them on their e-government plans.<br />
3.c require ministries and agencies to set targets for themselves as part of their e-government<br />
plans in order to promote action and improve accountability. These targets could be<br />
negotiated with the MoF based on the circumstances of each agency. Once agreed upon,<br />
agencies should be held accountable to these targets.<br />
4. In order to support agency and ministry understanding of the requirements concerning egovernment,<br />
it could be beneficial to reorganise and simplify existing guidance into a more<br />
comprehensive form. This would also serve to clarify and explain existing regulations and improve<br />
access.<br />
5. The government has maintained citizens’ confidence by guarding against privacy and security<br />
abuses. Towards this end it would be beneficial to continue to offer technical support to agencies<br />
seeking authentication solutions.<br />
19