e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
e-GOVERNMENT IN FINLAND - ePractice.eu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
showed that top management commitment combined with skilled project management were important<br />
factors for success. 27<br />
161. The 2002 Programme of Action to Promote Online Government states that in 2002 each agency<br />
should draw up an electronic service strategy – based on an appraisal of user needs – as an integral part of<br />
their overall service strategy. It also recommended that each strategy should include goals, although<br />
monitoring and evaluation are not specifically mentioned. The Ministry of Finance is tasked with drawing<br />
up guidelines for formulating an electronic service strategy and designing a programme for ministries and<br />
agencies wanting to learn about how to develop their e-government strategy. The programme calls for each<br />
ministry to incorporate an e-strategy into its four-year planning and budgeting cycle, and the MoF has<br />
issued guidelines.<br />
162. When asked whether or not they had a plan for e-government, half of the respondents to the<br />
OECD survey reported having either one (36%) or several (14%) such plans (50% total). This falls short of<br />
the figure reported to the Ministry of Finance’s annual survey, which indicated that 76% of all agencies<br />
and ministries had an information management plan in 2001. Part of the discrepancy may be due to the fact<br />
that agencies did not consider their broader information management plans to be specifically about egovernment.<br />
163. In the OECD sample, 21% of those reporting an e-government plan indicated having a specific<br />
plan on e-government, while 25% had a general business plan that also covered e-government activities.<br />
The majority of e-government plans reported by respondents were produced between 1998 and 2001. Half<br />
reported having already revised their original e-government plans at least once.<br />
164. Almost all respondents to the OECD survey reported having included explicit goals in their egovernment<br />
plans (91%), and most also included an explicit strategy for reaching those goals (87%).<br />
Evaluation plans and frameworks for monitoring goals, however, were less common. About 56% of<br />
respondents reported that their plans indicated how to monitor goals. About 50% included an evaluation<br />
framework.<br />
165. The ministries and agencies that reported not having any kind of e-government plan gave many<br />
different reasons. For some, it seemed to be a question of lack of resources, while others mentioned that<br />
planning takes place as part of a more informal process, such as ad hoc working groups set up to deal with<br />
specific e-government activities.<br />
166. One small agency interviewed (TUKES – the Safety Technology Authority) reported that while<br />
its electronic services strategy was partly inspired by government “background documents”, the main push<br />
for developing a strategy came from business customers who sent e-mail inquiries about whether or not<br />
they could conduct transactions electronically. In fact, they initiated their electronic services when<br />
enterprises began to submit documents by e-mail. TUKES had to determine if the documents were<br />
acceptable and what was the appropriate response. However, current use of electronic services remains<br />
low: while around 8 000 official documents arrive each year, only 20-30 were received electronically in<br />
2001.<br />
167. The OECD survey found that there is a relation between having an e-government plan and<br />
providing electronic services, as well as how advanced the services are. Among respondents, ministries and<br />
agencies with an e-government plan are more likely to provide electronic services to citizens, businesses<br />
and others than those without a plan:<br />
27<br />
JUNA report on the e-Stra project, Information Society and Management’s Strategic Ability in Public<br />
Administration.<br />
68